Re: [VOTE] Release uimacpp-2.2.2-02 as uimacpp-2.2.2-incubating

Vote canceled. Will resubmit when RC3 is ready. Thanks for the feedback, Eddie On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Eddie Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have finished testing this release candidate and there are no > remaining issues that impact reliability or performance. > > The release ar

Re: [VOTE] Release uimacpp-2.2.2-02 as uimacpp-2.2.2-incubating

OK, will do. Thanks, Eddie On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Need to check RAT report: some files noted there as missing apache >>> license >>> are not generated. For instance: Perl.html in scriptators/perl, and same >>> for python and tcl. >>> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release uimacpp-2.2.2-02 as uimacpp-2.2.2-incubating

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> - I'm unclear on the use of the APR in UIMACPP. I see APR >>> headers in the UIMACPP binary distribution. The APR NOTICE >>> file contains several acknowledgments that should be in >>> the UIMACPP NOTICE file *if* U

Re: [VOTE] Release uimacpp-2.2.2-02 as uimacpp-2.2.2-incubating

Eddie Epstein wrote: Marshall, Comments below ... On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A small thing to maybe fix: in examples/descriptors/XCasWriterCasConsumer.xml - there is a definition of the SourceDocumentInformation element, inline (not "import"

Re: [VOTE] Release uimacpp-2.2.2-02 as uimacpp-2.2.2-incubating

Marshall, Comments below ... On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A small thing to maybe fix: > in examples/descriptors/XCasWriterCasConsumer.xml - there is a definition of > the SourceDocumentInformation element, inline (not "import"ed) that > contains: >

Re: [VOTE] Release uimacpp-2.2.2-02 as uimacpp-2.2.2-incubating

Eddie Epstein wrote: Thilo, Thanks for the pointers. Comments and question below... On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I noticed the following: - The NOTICE files say "Apache UIMACPP". In the sandbox releases, we just say "Apache UIMA". Not sure we sho

Re: [VOTE] Release uimacpp-2.2.2-02 as uimacpp-2.2.2-incubating

Thilo, Thanks for the pointers. Comments and question below... On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed the following: > > - The NOTICE files say "Apache UIMACPP". In the sandbox > releases, we just say "Apache UIMA". Not sure we should > say Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release uimacpp-2.2.2-02 as uimacpp-2.2.2-incubating

A small thing to maybe fix: in examples/descriptors/XCasWriterCasConsumer.xml - there is a definition of the SourceDocumentInformation element, inline (not "import"ed) that contains: URI of document. (For example, file:///MyDirectory/myFile.txt for a simple file or http://www.research.ibm.com/

Re: [VOTE] Release uimacpp-2.2.2-02 as uimacpp-2.2.2-incubating

I noticed the following: - The NOTICE files say "Apache UIMACPP". In the sandbox releases, we just say "Apache UIMA". Not sure we should say Apache UIMACPP, since that's not really a project name? - The src distribution says that it includes the ICU, both in NOTICE and LICENSE. Howeve

Re: [VOTE] Release uimacpp-2.2.2-02 as uimacpp-2.2.2-incubating

Pn Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Eddie Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have finished testing this release candidate and there are no > remaining issues that impact reliability or performance. > > The release artifacts and RAT results are available on > p.a.o/~eae/uimacpp-release-candidates/

[VOTE] Release uimacpp-2.2.2-02 as uimacpp-2.2.2-incubating

We have finished testing this release candidate and there are no remaining issues that impact reliability or performance. The release artifacts and RAT results are available on p.a.o/~eae/uimacpp-release-candidates/2.2.2/02/ Please cast your vote: [ ] +1 release candidate uimacpp-2.2.2-incubat