On 12/30/06, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why use the bandwidth to design it here, rather than initiate it at
OASIS?
snip
Because things are happening here, and not at OASIS. If and when that
changes, we can take our discussion there. If you would like to start
some discussion at
On 1/2/07, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I'm not sure there's a contradiction between what I'm proposing,
and what's in the spec proposal. When I run an Apache UIMA application,
I make the decision what I want to see in my CAS. Any other application
deserializing XMI files may do
Adam Lally wrote:
On 1/2/07, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I'm not sure there's a contradiction between what I'm proposing,
and what's in the spec proposal. When I run an Apache UIMA application,
I make the decision what I want to see in my CAS. Any other application
On 12/29/06, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I don't feel like second-guessing the OASIS TC at this point. We
have nothing but the Research report to on right now, and every reason
to believe that it will change significantly before morphing into a
standard.
I'm not sure I get
On 12/29/06, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't mean ignore; there isn't much to ignore right now ;-) I'm
waiting to jump on any technical discussion that might develop there,
but there is nothing. I don't have the bandwidth to initiate anything
myself. However, I'm certainly
Adam Lally wrote:
On 12/29/06, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't mean ignore; there isn't much to ignore right now ;-) I'm
waiting to jump on any technical discussion that might develop there,
but there is nothing. I don't have the bandwidth to initiate anything
myself. However,
This chain of emails has a lot of tangled threads and this is an
attempt to disentangle them and reevaluate what it we're trying to
acheive.
I think there were basically two motivations for the whole ball of yarn:
(1) We're unhappy with some of our APIs, in particular (a) the
interface CAS can
