Adam Lally wrote:
FYI, a while back I posted some code we could consider adding for JCAS
that allow you to get iterators parameterized by specific JCAS types:
http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg04657.html
It might be interesting to consider adding something like that
di
Adam Lally wrote:
FYI, a while back I posted some code we could consider adding for JCAS
that allow you to get iterators parameterized by specific JCAS types:
http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg04657.html
It might be interesting to consider adding something like that
di
Sounds good to me.
--Thilo
Adam Lally wrote:
> FYI, a while back I posted some code we could consider adding for JCAS
> that allow you to get iterators parameterized by specific JCAS types:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg04657.html
>
> It might be interesting to c
FYI, a while back I posted some code we could consider adding for JCAS
that allow you to get iterators parameterized by specific JCAS types:
http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg04657.html
It might be interesting to consider adding something like that
directly on the JCAS i
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Hello,
right now every FSIndex uses FeatureStructure as the generics parameter for
the Iterator it can provide. That means that the AnnoationIndex also
must provide
an FeatureStructure Iterator and not an AnnotationFS Iterator which
would be much
nicer
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> right now every FSIndex uses FeatureStructure as the generics parameter for
> the Iterator it can provide. That means that the AnnoationIndex also
> must provide
> an FeatureStructure Iterator and not an AnnotationFS Iterator which
> would be much
> nicer in cli
2009/6/8 Jörn Kottmann
> Hello,
>
> right now every FSIndex uses FeatureStructure as the generics parameter for
> the Iterator it can provide. That means that the AnnoationIndex also must
> provide
> an FeatureStructure Iterator and not an AnnotationFS Iterator which would
> be much
> nicer in cl
Hello,
right now every FSIndex uses FeatureStructure as the generics parameter for
the Iterator it can provide. That means that the AnnoationIndex also
must provide
an FeatureStructure Iterator and not an AnnotationFS Iterator which
would be much
nicer in client code.
I would like to suggest
