Yes, it really sounds nice to me too (so +1 again).
Tommaso
2010/4/6 Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com
Marshall Schor wrote:
Here's my vision of automation (achieved over time :-) ), and why CI
could be important - it is building the potential releases from source
checkout.
We have CI
Marshall Schor wrote:
Here's my vision of automation (achieved over time :-) ), and why CI
could be important - it is building the potential releases from source
checkout.
We have CI going on Hudson; we decide at some point that things merit a
release; so we push some button on the CI or Nexus
Here's my vision of automation (achieved over time :-) ), and why CI
could be important - it is building the potential releases from source
checkout.
We have CI going on Hudson; we decide at some point that things merit a
release; so we push some button on the CI or Nexus interface and get a
On 3/28/2010 12:36 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
I'm +1 for doing this, and offer to do some/most of the legwork to get
this to happen.
Other opinions?
From a development point of view Hudson can help us
to make sure that our build is never broken, and if so notice
2010/3/27 Marshall Schor m...@schor.com
I'm +1 for doing this, and offer to do some/most of the legwork to get
this to happen.
Other opinions?
I'm +1 too.
Tommaso
Marshall Schor wrote:
I'm +1 for doing this, and offer to do some/most of the legwork to get
this to happen.
Other opinions?
From a development point of view Hudson can help us
to make sure that our build is never broken, and if so notice us,
but usually our build always works. Not sure if
