Here are some examples of large files (or large collections of files
The api java docs;
The api java docs as a zip file
The 4 books in html format
It seems good to put them in people.a.o/www/incubator.a.o/uima/downloads.
It seems bad to put them in SVN (because there's no need for
versioning
archiving + redirects.
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Here are some examples of large files (or large collections of files
The api java docs;
The api java docs as a zip file
The 4 books in html format
It seems good to put them in people.a.o/www/incubator.a.o/uima/downloads.
It seems bad to put
wrote:
Fine with me to delete the HTML documentations (manual and javadoc) on
the mirror. I thought we can use it and link them from our website.
As far as I know, there is no script to upload the documentation. I
did it manually.
-- Michael
Marshall Schor wrote:
Here are some examples
Marshall Schor wrote:
Here's an argument for keeping the big things we point to from our
website, like the javaDocs and the 4 books in html form, on the
a.o/dist/incubator/uima site:
It is automatically archived. And, when it's deleted from the
mirror, a redirect is put
this right
now - if anyone else wants to take a crack, OK with me.
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Fine with me.
-- Michael
Marshall Schor wrote:
One further thought: A lot of projects put the RELEASE NOTES for
particular releases at the top level of the dist/ - where the file
name includes
Original Message
Subject:Re: [schor] incubator/uima/eclipseUpdateSite/
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:35:24 +0100 (CET)
From: Henk P. Penning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 29 Dec
that.
Are any other lines (e.g., redirects of some sort) needed in the
.htaccess file at this time?
We would appreciate any checking you could do of our work to migrate
to the mirror system.
Thanks for all your help.
-Marshall
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007 3:23 AM, Marshall Schor
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
(apologies for not jumping in promptly)
On Dec 24, 2007 3:48 AM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I updated our website download page and documentation page. I made the
download page work with mirrors, and changed the format for accessing
previous
Michael Baessler wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
subversion really is the way to go for release documentation
OK, so as far as I understand we go with the documentation the same
way as with the previous Apache UIMA releases. We check in the
documentation
to SVN and provide a download
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
subversion really is the way to go for release documentation
OK, so as far as I understand we go with the documentation the same
way as with the previous Apache UIMA releases
://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev%40incubator.apache.org/msg05057.html
--Thilo
Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12555343#action_12555343
]
Marshall Schor
Marshall Schor wrote:
Hi Thilo -
I forgot about that email trail :-) The Eclipse update site is created
using an ant build script. Is there a way to make the poms work for these?
That would be nicer than more build scripts.
Looking at the pom xml more carefully, I'm guessing it could
Marshall Schor wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Hi Thilo -
I forgot about that email trail :-) The Eclipse update site is created
using an ant build script. Is there a way to make the poms work for these?
That would be nicer than more build scripts.
Looking at the pom xml more
I posted a question on the maven users list asking for best practices
for addressing the updating-the-parent-link when the version changes, in
case there's something obvious we could be doing :-).
-Marshall
Michael Baessler (JIRA) wrote:
[
Michael - can you announce UIMA 2.2.1 release on the various
announcement places?
-Marshall
Michael Baessler (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Baessler closed UIMA-679.
Michael Baessler wrote:
+1
The Eclipse update site I thought was documented in our manual on
setting up Eclipse:
http://incubator.apache.org/uima/downloads/releaseDocs/2.2.1-incubating/docs/html/overview_and_setup/overview_and_setup.html#ugr.ovv.eclipse_setup.install_uima_eclipse_plugins
Marshall Schor wrote:
I posted a question on the maven users list asking for best practices
for addressing the updating-the-parent-link when the version changes, in
case there's something obvious we could be doing :-).
The answer was:
you should try using the release feature of Maven
Hi Everyone -
I entered a start at a board report. It needs some filling out -
Joern - can you add a line or two about progress in the CAS editor?
Michael and Thilo - you've been doing quite a bit of work in the sandbox
projects - perhaps say something about progress here?
Any other
The Software Grant for UIMA-EE has been officially received by the
secretary of Apache. I'll proceed to 1) put in a Jira issue with a zip
file for it, and 2) set up in the sandbox under
sandbox
trunk
uima-ee
project 1
project 2 etc.
the files for this. As part of
My understanding from discussions and reading
http://people.apache.org/~rubys/3party.html
http://people.apache.org/%7Erubys/3party.html, the principles for
distributing things involving Eclipse are:
1) You can distribute binaries (but not sources) of things that are EPL
do we have the
processing executed by an Officer or Member of the ASF?
Thanks for your help and guidance, as usual :-) -Marshall
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 10:56 PM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Software Grant for UIMA-EE has been officially received
I vote for not duplicating things - can we find one link that would
always be relevant?
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
It's seems that we do not update our website with the Board Reports...
http://incubator.apache.org/uima/apache-board-status.html
Either we update it frequently or we
... :-)
-- Michael
Marshall Schor wrote:
I vote for not duplicating things - can we find one link that would
always be relevant?
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
It's seems that we do not update our website with the Board Reports...
http://incubator.apache.org/uima/apache-board-status.html
Either we
Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote:
I've filled out the IP Clearance form as far as I can. Ken - can you
fill in the rest and respond with any issues/concerns on the mailing
list here?
The ip form is here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/uima/site/trunk/uima-website/xdocs/ip-clearances
For those of you who may try and build uimaj-ee in the sandbox, there is
a 1-time maven startup problem.
We currently use a POM structure which has a common parent (in this
case, it is uimaj-ee's POM). The common parent factors out some common
settings, like release numbers and formats.
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
the incubator needs to document how to build a mirrored eclipse update
site. my eclipse-foo is not up to the task so i wondered if there are
be any volunteers here in uimaland who'd be willing to help out either
by answering some questions or (even better) creating
Well, this time I'll enter some text before pushing send :-) I guess
my mailing-foo or key-pushing-foo suffered a (hopefully) temporary
breakdown...
I'll volunteer to do this. Can you point me to where to stick the info,
and any other protocol-ish things I should be sure to pay attention
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
For those of you who may try and build uimaj-ee in the sandbox, there
is a 1-time maven startup problem.
...
How do we do this in the core? Aren't we using the same
mechanisms there?
Good question. I did this experiment:
delete uimaj-ee from
-version
. . .
version${uimaj-ee-release-version}/version
Fix was to not use a property substitution in the version element, and
instead copy the uimaj-ee-release-version tag. This is probably a Maven
defect - I'll see (on the maven list).
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote
Marshall Schor wrote:
For those of you who may try and build uimaj-ee in the sandbox, there
is a 1-time maven startup problem.
We currently use a POM structure which has a common parent (in this
case, it is uimaj-ee's POM). The common parent factors out some
common settings, like release
that), and then increment the poms to
2.4.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
Would this be a reasonable process?
-Marshall
Adam Lally wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 8:56 AM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was also suggested that we use the maven release plugin to update
the version stuff. I think we
Michael -
I'm confused about how this test is setup. The test descriptor this
code uses loads an aggregate, and then runs a process method which ends
up calling some dummy process method called SequencerTestAnnotator.
This process method dumps (to a file) the result spec. Is that the case
Hi -
Can you please post more information so we might be better able to help?
For instance, what version of UIMA did you install, where did you get it
from, what steps did you take when installing it, did you set up the
environment variables as described in the README?
-Marshall
chandra
The path variable seems to show several possible problems.
There appear to be several installs of UIMA, possibly at different
levels, from different sources, on your machine. The PATH variable
points to the following:
C:\UIMA\bin;
C:\Program Files\IBM\uima\bin;
C:\uima\uima1\bin;
I see another problem - this is probably the direct problem.
On you machine, you have an environment variable called JAVA_HOME, and
it is set to
C:\j2sdk1.4.2_03
However, it appears you no longer have Java installed there.
To fix, please install Java 5 (or 6 - these are the levels required
Hi -
Please post what you have the JAVA_HOME environment variable set to.
It appears to be set to:
C:\Program Files\\bin\
This doesn't look correct.
-Marshall
chandra sekhar wrote:
Respected sir , I set JAVA_HOME to C:Program Files only. Error in
document analyzer is solved,but there is
chandra sekhar wrote:
Respected Sir , now i set
JAVA_HOME variable to C:\Program Files
This still appears to be incorrect, I think. Is there a local student
or teacher at your university who can help you set up your JAVA_HOME
variable to point to where Java 5 is installed?
I'm
There is a new sandbox project, currently called uima-ee. Should we
change it's name?
A suggested alternative uima-as.
Some arguments pro / con changing the name
Pro:
1. uima-as goes with UIMA, Asynchronous Scaleout, and the name,
therefore, more clearly matches the functionality.
chandra sekhar wrote:
Respected Sir ,
I didnt found any error messages while running both batch files.But i didnt
get a window when i run documentAnalyzer.bat file.
I don't have a good idea what to suggest specifically. Please see if
you can get a professor, or another student at your
If you run eclipse:eclipse goal in the root POM project (uimaj), it
runs, but doesn't do the right things. It doesn't reliably set up
linked resources in the .project, and doesn't reliably set up the
.classpath file with the proper entries for those linked resources. The
observed result is
There are maybe two or three problems.
First - please check if you have a firewall that is blocking internet
access for particular programs (many firewalls have configuration per
program, and block out-bound internet access) One way to check this is
to turn off the firewall for a test, and
Did you install the uima plugins?
If so, please do menu Window - Show View - Other - PDE - Plug-ins
and verify that the plugin
org.apache.uima.desceditor is shown, without any error markers. If
there are error markers, please do
menu Window-Show View - Other - PDE -Plug-in Dependencies, and
The basic maven build creates Jars in the target with alternate names:
project uimaj-core = drop the j from uimaj, and don't suffix the
version - uima-core.jar
An exception to this is jVinci - jVinci becomes jVinci.jar (no version)
Another exception: when the uimaj-ep-runtime plugin is
Hi -
You need to add classpath entries for your project that refer to the
UIMA jars in the lib directory of UIMA_HOME.
A simple way to do this is to open your project's properties (select the
project, then do menu: Project - Properties) and select Java Build
Path. Then select the Libraries
Thanks Jörn.
I think that with some experimentation we can get the PDE nature to work
properly - at least, that's my goal for now :-) I'll do some more tests
to see if I can come up with an approach which allows both maven and
Eclipse to work .
Thanks. -Marshall
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
On
I'm doing a redesign for the result spec area to improve performance.
The basic idea is to put a hasBeenChanged flag into the result spec
object, and use it being false to enable users to avoid recomputing
things.
Why not use equal ? because a single result spec object is shared
among
perhaps this is just a couple of spelling errors?
1. Descriptor has an e (not an i) as the 2nd letter.
2. In the UIMA example descriptors, there is no
ProductNumberDescriptor file. Did you put one in there that you are
trying to access?
-Marshall
chandra sekhar wrote:
Respected sir ,
I
I do not know what your pdf file is. Although you say in an earlier
mail you attached it, attachments do not come thru on this mailing
list. Can you describe the PDF file? I looked through our UIMA PDF's
and don't find this name.
If this name is coming from some other download you have
The class CapabilityLanguageFlowObject has 2 defined constructors, but
one is never used/referenced:
CapabilityLanguageFlowObject(List aNodeList, ResultSpecification resultSpec)
Can this be removed?
-Marshall
If this is removed or if it is never called, then there is a section of
the logic in CapabilityLanguageFlowObject which is never used, because
mNodeList == null:
if (mNodeList != null) {
// 80 or lines of code elided
}
Can this logic be removed?
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
The class
In looking thru the code for ResultSpecification_Impl, it seems there
seems to be an inconsistency - unless I (quite possible :-) ) missed
something.
The calls to the containsType(...) method operate in one of 2 ways,
depending on whether or not the result specification has been compiled
by
I'm thinking of simplifying the CapabilityContainer class. Right now it
has code to process input and well as output capabilities, but the input
ones appear never to be used. Can anyone confirm that? If confirmed, I
would propose to remove the part related to input capabilities.
There is a
are right,
if this constructor isn't necessary both, the code and the
constructor, can be removed.
Seems that the architecture has changed here. :-)
-- Michael
Marshall Schor wrote:
If this is removed or if it is never called, then there is a section
of the logic in CapabilityLanguageFlowObject
with the result spec argument in the process() method and
one without.
In older UIMA versions, when using the debugger I see that both
constructors are used there.
-- Michael
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thanks. I'll see about comparing the older method with the current
method, to verify this. -Marshall
Easy to see- just trace the test case... -Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
But it would still be interesting why this is never needed and how it
works now.
-- Michael
Marshall Schor wrote:
OK. This would confirm that the other constructor is no longer
needed, since the test that passes
of capability language flow is
not done in the real application use cases by passing the result spec in
the top level call to the process method of the analysis engine?
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Easy to see- just trace the test case... -Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
But it would
makes a new
CapabilityLanguageFlowObject, passing in the pre-computed Flow Table).
So that's how it uses this constructor, in the case where no specific
result spec is passed.
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Easy to see- just trace the test case... -Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote
.
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Hi Marshall,
as usual, my view is pretty much the exact opposite ;-)
First of all, I don't see the sense in creating yet another
category. To my mind, there's nothing wrong with having
mature components in the sandbox
Eddie - this is for you to check I think:
There is code in UimacppEngine in method serializeResultSpecification
which adds result spec types and features to 2 IntVector arrays (one for
Types, one for Features). As currently designed, these miss getting
the subtypes of types, and all the
I'll fix the Javadocs to correspond to what the code does. This will
have the result that
addResultFeature(1-feature, languages) will *add* to the existing
languages, while
addResultFeature(1-feature) will *replace* all existing languages
with x-unspecified.
-Marshall
Marshall Schor
Some corner cases.
Case 1: If using the method to alter an existing result spec by adding
a single type with an associated set of languages, the passed in
allAnnotatorFeatures boolean will now be unioned with any existing
setting of this. Javadocs updated to reflect this.
Case 2: If you
Hi -
From another email you sent, I see you got by this error. What did you
do to resolve this one?
-Marshall
chandra sekhar wrote:
Respected sir ,
I am implementing the pdf which i am attached with this mail. I
executed correctly upto SPECIFY THE ANALYSIS ENGINE DESCRIPTOR.
While
For others wanting to follow this, the references to the right side,
left side refer to the CAS Visual Debugger tool. The PDF he refers to
is the article from IBM DeveloperWorks which is a tutorial on creating
UIMA applications, by Nicholas Chase, in case you want to search for it.
What this
and easier to integrate to the core if we decide to
move it from the Sandbox to the core any time in the future.
-- Michael
Marshall Schor wrote:
There is a new sandbox project, currently called uima-ee. Should we
change it's name?
A suggested alternative uima-as.
Some arguments pro / con changing
Without actually testing this (so this may be a wrong conclusion) - it
seems to me that the code in CapabilityLanguageFlowController that sets
up the result specs for components, by language, in the mFlowTable,
ignores the typesOrFeatures that the result spec adds when compile() is
called.
add features to the type in question, completely unknown
to this delegate - and of course, this delegate would not be setting
those other features.
This would lead to another question - should we deprecate
allAnnotatoreFeatures because of this?
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor
Suggestion: isolate the problem from the Cas Visual Debugger tool, by
running a simple Java application that runs the annotator.
Instructions for how to do that are in the tutorials and user guides
document on the Apache UIMA web site.
You can use the Eclipse debugger to single-step through
The thing that adds allAnnotatorFeatures and subtypes is compiling the
result spec. The builder of the mFlowTable doesn't compile the
resultspec before using it - so it doesn't have these consequences.
-Marshall
Adam Lally wrote:
On Jan 24, 2008 7:54 AM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED
The code which checks if a type or feature is in a result spec, for a
particular language, always includes generalizing the language specifier
by dropping the part beyond the first -. For example, en-us and
en-uk are simplified to en. Because of this, I'm thinking of
shrinking the result
The implementation for checking if a feature is in the result spec does
the following:
If the result-spec is not compiled, it says the feature is present if
it specifically put in, or if its type has the allAnnotatorFeatures flag
set.
If the result-spec is compiled, it says the feature is
, but
please let me know if I've misunderstood something. We don't want to
impact users with this change.
Thanks for your comments :-)
-Marshall
-Original Message-
From: Marshall Schor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:06 AM
To: uima-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject
Michael Baessler wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 6:56 AM, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I tried to figure out how the ResultSpecification handling in
uima-core
works with all side effects to check how it can be done
to detect when a ResultSpec
Can I replace the class CapabilityContainer with the much more efficient
(now) ResultSpecification class?
It seems to me they do the almost same thing, and the
ResultSpecification may be handling the corner cases better.
Is there some subtle difference I'm missing? It would be nice to
class.
Is there some other difference I'm missing?
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Can I replace the class CapabilityContainer with the much more
efficient (now) ResultSpecification class?
It seems to me they do the almost same thing, and the
ResultSpecification may
ip-clearances is where we have our ip clearance forms for UIMA. There's
one (in progress) for uima-as, not done yet.
It's ok.
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
I updated our website with information on the LREC
workshop. When I did svn up on people, some new
files were
Language specifications are in a hierarchy. For example, from most
inclusive to finer subsets, we have:
x-unspecified
en
en-us
A result spec's most common use is in a negative sense - Annotators can
check a result spec and if it doesn't contain the type or feature, it
can skip
return false, if foo is in the result spec
only for particular languages.
I plan correct the treatment of x-unspecified, along these lines, to
work as described above.
Please post any concerns/objections :-)
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
While experimenting with this approach, I found some
matching works like this:
Language arg RsltSpc Matches
enen-us no
en-us en yes
x-unspecified *any* yes behavior needs to be different
enx-unsp..yes
Is this correct?
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Can I replace
for en,
and in particular it should *not* produce output for x-unspecified.
This annotator is written to respect the result spec, so it doesn't
produce anything.
Anyone object to my changing the test cases?
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Language specifications are in a hierarchy
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
I tried implimenting this change, and 2 test cases fail. They look
like they are failing exactly in the case where the result
specification has a TypeOrFeature with a specified type other than
x-unspecified, and the containsTypeOrFeature method
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Language specifications are in a hierarchy. For example, from most
inclusive to finer subsets, we have:
x-unspecified
en
en-us
A result spec's most common use is in a negative sense
Except for UIMA-727. Michael - please run any performance tests you
have. I hope the performance is now significantly improved :-)
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
I tried implimenting this change, and 2 test cases fail. They look
like they are failing exactly in the case where the result
specification has a TypeOrFeature with a specified type other than
x
Suppose I have a capability language flow for an aggregate having 2
delegates where the aggregate's capability spec says it outputs type
Toutput.
Let's say the delegate #2 has a capability spec saying it outputs
Toutput,
but needs Tinput as an input, and the aggregate's Capability
Many UIMA framework objects implement the MetaDataObject interface.
This interface has an equals method, which does a attribute by attribute
equals check (recursively).
This interface, however, doesn't implement the hashCode method.
So, if any object were to insert one of these objects into
Reporter: Marshall Schor
Assignee: Marshall Schor
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.3
The ResultSpec impl has an inner class, ToF_Languages. When comparing 2 result
specificaitons for equal in test cases, these are compared. But they are
missing an equals (and hashCode
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12564316#action_12564316
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-735
that the TypeOrFeature had an issue with hasCode.
On Jan 30, 2008 10:57 PM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many UIMA framework objects implement the MetaDataObject interface.
This interface has an equals method, which does a attribute by attribute
equals check (recursively
I plan to rename things in SVN from uima-ee to uima-as this Sunday, as
was discussed in another mail thread. This may break the uima-as builds
for a while as we work out the loose ends. If this timing is bad,
please voice your opinion.
-Marshall
renaming to Wednesday, Feb 6.
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
I plan to rename things in SVN from uima-ee to uima-as this Sunday, as
was discussed in another mail thread. This may break the uima-as
builds for a while as we work out the loose ends. If this timing is
bad, please voice your opinion
that it might have a use case. In practice, it
seems to me that most annotators figure out the features available
either during compilation by using the JCas or during the initialization
of the Annotator.
-Original Message-
From: Marshall Schor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
Hello -
Can you post two things, to the uima-user list (this list is the
uima-dev list, and this thread is off topic):
First, the entire stack trace when you get the error.
Second, the location of the ProductNumberAnnotator in your system.
Thanks; with that information, we may be able to
There are 2 configurations in the POM for building Javadocs: one in the
parent uimaj POM and one in the uimaj-distr POM.
The thinking behind this was that the one in the uimaj-distr POM would
run as part of the assembly process, and build Javadocs for the binary
distribution, consisting of
Maven was built to expect a hierarchical (not flat) project / sub
project structure. There are many fixes to maven that focus on making
it work for flat (e.g. Eclipse-like) project structures. But some
things appear not to work properly. See e.g.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-261
The eclipse:eclipse plugin will take the maven artifactId and use it
for the Eclipse Plugin ID
The artifact id we use are things like uimaj-ep-debug.
The eclipse plugin id is different:org.apache.uima.debug
Any objection to my changing the artifact IDs in the POMs for our
Eclipse plugins
I did an experiment where I configered the maven POM for one of our
Eclipse plugins to let maven's eclipse:eclipse update the PDE Manifest.
However, I found a bug in how it treated -SNAPSHOT - it turned
2.3.0.incubating-SNAPSHOT in the maven version into a Manifest entry
UIMA's Soap implementation depends on having the axis classes (from
TomCat?) in its classpath. For normal UIMA deployments, this is
accomplished by adding the needed Jar to the classpath.
For Eclipse and RCP plugin environments, the user's plugin is depending
on the uima-ep-runtime plugin,
it depends on from axis.
What do others think?
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
UIMA's Soap implementation depends on having the axis classes (from
TomCat?) in its classpath. For normal UIMA deployments, this is
accomplished by adding the needed Jar to the classpath.
For Eclipse and RCP plugin
A patch I just committed in uima-as accesses version/build info from
some private spot (in uima-as), probably for use in error messages.
It seems to me that this capability would be generally of use in UIMA,
and it would be good to have some standard way of including it in our
error/log
It used to be that you could see in the Jira the svn commits that were
done. Today when I looked in Jira, there were no SVN commits listed,
even on old issues. Is it just my setup, or do others see this?
-Marshall
P.S. - it may have had something to do with the fisheye tab, which I
clicked
401 - 500 of 2550 matches
Mail list logo
