On 15 September 2015 at 00:41, David Reader wrote:
>
> On 14 Sep 2015, at 19:29, James Bensley wrote:
>> 460k routes though, not far off! Enough to get peering I'd say.
> Good luck getting a significant percentage of that…
I agree that isn't easy although it's really case by
On 17/09/2015 10:19:46, James Bensley wrote:
A common deployment is that we are using static IPs between CPE and
exchange device, then the customer is running DHCP relay (it's
configured on our CPE LAN interface) back to a central DHCP server
somewhere else in their WAN.
On 17/09/15 10:01, James Bensley wrote:
On 14 September 2015 at 22:55, Tom Hill wrote:
On 14/09/15 13:32, Robin Williams wrote:
I'm sure there's a sound technical reason, but again, it disadvantages
smaller CPs disproportionately who may only have a few customers on
On 14 September 2015 at 22:55, Tom Hill wrote:
> On 14/09/15 13:32, Robin Williams wrote:
>> I'm sure there's a sound technical reason, but again, it disadvantages
>> smaller CPs disproportionately who may only have a few customers on each
>> switch.
>
> I know if I were
On 17 September 2015 at 10:04, Marty Strong wrote:
> This is all however going on the assumption that when joining an IXP the ASNs
> your traffic is destined to/from that the ISP in question or their upstream
> is willing to peer with you on a settlement free basis.
On 15 September 2015 at 06:44, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 14/Sep/15 19:42, Paul Thornton wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> You don't have the entire routing table @LINX yet :)
>
> And depending on your operation, transit could be cheaper than peering.
And peering can be cheaper than
Precisely.
On the LINX RSes I see approximately 76k routes, falls far short of the 460k
figure that you’d need to peer with EVERYBODY to get :D
Regards,
Marty Strong
--
CloudFlare - AS13335
Network Engineer
ma...@cloudflare.com
+65 9178 8502 SG
+44 7584 906
Evening all.
Apologies for being on topic, especially on a Thursday night at the end of a
UKNOF meeting which sadly I was unable to attend.
Looking for recommendations/suggestions for 10gig switch.
Requirements are minimum 4 x 10gig fibre ports.
Plus minimum 8 x 10gig, not fussed fiber or
On 15 September 2015 at 09:37, Mark Stokes wrote:
> On 14/09/2015 21:19, Joshua McQuistan wrote:
>> On 14/09/15 15:16, Mark Stokes wrote:
>>> Who needs cheap transit when peering clearly is the way to go.
>> I agree but what happens when transit < transport + exchange?
>
> This is
brocade vdx 6720 24 port sfp+ switches can be picked up second hand for
around 1500 eur on ebay
We are very happy with them although we are just usin simple layer 2 vlan
featuresets...( no ospf bgp or mpls or sdn stuff)
On 17 Sep 2015 18:51, "Joseph Waite" wrote:
>
On 17/09/2015 18:50, Joseph Waite wrote:
Looking for recommendations/suggestions for 10gig switch.
Requirements are minimum 4 x 10gig fibre ports.
Plus minimum 8 x 10gig, not fussed fiber or copper, rj45 or cx4
Only requirements on switch is lag group support & jumbo
engineer at $JOB has been buying Nuage (sp?) switches which he says
are very cheap for 10G
12 matches
Mail list logo