On 15 September 2015 at 09:37, Mark Stokes <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14/09/2015 21:19, Joshua McQuistan wrote: >> On 14/09/15 15:16, Mark Stokes wrote: >>> Who needs cheap transit when peering clearly is the way to go. >> I agree but what happens when transit < transport + exchange? > > This is not a problem. The sales teams within a network operator that > operates a peered network needs to know why peering provides advantages > other than pure cost. > > When competing for business from non-peered networks a peered network > can highlight the following plus points. There are more... > > -Improved routing control/path quality > -Peering can lower latency and congestion > -Industry community presence > -Increased marketable assets including technical prowess. > > There will be some business models that won't need these advantages. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMRkUFnucnU > > :))) > > Regards > Mark
Bang on the money sir - I refer you to the previously linked document: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1i2bPZDt75hAwcR4iKMqaNSGIeM-nJSWLZ6SLTTnuXNs Cheers, James.
