On 2019/06/07 17:22, Aled Morris wrote:
> I have customers with IPv6 dual stack and they are having intermittent
> problems (SSL failure)
> connecting to Santander's retail banking portal.
>
> Is there anyone from Santander (or with a contact in Santander) on this list?
>
> I'm wondering if the
I have customers with IPv6 dual stack and they are having intermittent
problems (SSL failure) connecting to Santander's retail banking portal.
Is there anyone from Santander (or with a contact in Santander) on this
list?
I'm wondering if the problem is related to this:
$ host retail.santander.co
Hi,
The IPv6 global unicast address assignments registry has been updated to
reflect the allocation of the following block to the RIPE NCC:
2a10:::/12
You can find the registry at:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-unicast-address-assignments/
The allocation was made in accordance with
Hi Peter,
That's correct, in this case the host was a proxy frontend to some
public services and is locked down to only be able to talk to its
backends, no http/s out, no DNS except to internal resolvers.
Basically I looked into it as much as I could justify, and to be
honest the only reason why
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:13 PM John Bourke
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We build and operate Satellite ISP platforms for distributors of satellite
> services. These distributors sell through resellers to end customers.
>
>
>
> We got a “Notice of Claimed Infringement” for a torrent download of
> copyrig
This line of questioning is utterly bizarre. These operations are well
known to use bad data from questionable sources. We blackholed a bunch
of them at the MX after hundreds of complaints about a netblock which
had been returned to the free pool years ago.
I think it is perfectly reasonable f
So does the host have no HTTP/HTTPS access, or name server lookups etc?
BT will use all those ports these days.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: uknof [mailto:uknof-boun...@lists.uknof.org.uk] On Behalf Of Andy Smith
Sent: 07 June 2019 15:28
To: uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ukno
Hi Peter,
Just iptables on the host, it's just that this particular host has a
restrictive firewall on both input and output and given the ports
and IPs listed in the report it should not have been possible for
that activity to happen.
Of course, if it had been compromised then maybe the firewall
Love to know what firewall you're using that guarantees you can't get any form
of BT through it please?
Pete
-Original Message-
From: uknof [mailto:uknof-boun...@lists.uknof.org.uk] On Behalf Of Andy Smith
Sent: 07 June 2019 15:04
To: uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk
Subject: Re: [uknof] Notice
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 05:38:10PM +0400, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 17:25, Andy Smith wrote:
> > However, one day they sent one that implicated one of our
> > infrastructure hosts and I could not see any way in which that could
> > be torrenting, so I asked for more inf
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 17:25, Andy Smith wrote:
>
> However, one day they sent one that implicated one of our
> infrastructure hosts and I could not see any way in which that could
> be torrenting, so I asked for more information. Every form of
> contact I made resulted in an auto response suggest
Hi John,
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 01:08:49PM +, John Bourke wrote:
> We got a "Notice of Claimed Infringement" for a torrent download of copyright
> material by one of the reseller's customers. We can identify the end
> customer from logs.
>
> What is best practice when dealing with these c
Hi,
We build and operate Satellite ISP platforms for distributors of satellite
services. These distributors sell through resellers to end customers.
We got a "Notice of Claimed Infringement" for a torrent download of copyright
material by one of the reseller's customers. We can identify the e
13 matches
Mail list logo
