On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Ben Ward wrote:
>
> Hi NOFfers,
>
> Despite distrusting HTTP Speed Tests I'm investigating speed test
> software/hardware which I can deploy inside a private network infrastructure
> to prove problems off our network when only HTTP is available to diagnose
> "sl
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Mike Simkins wrote:
>
> Try SiXXS (www.sixxs.net)
>
Unfortunately, as good as SiXXS can be for basic free IPv6 tunnels,
they do not do BGP; they explain their reasons at
http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=bgppeering. However, they
do have a rather g
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Stephen Wilcox
wrote:
> The CDN/"DDoS cleaners" simply do it by having vast amounts of capacity
> globally generally distributed into autonomous nodes. Akamai for example has
> many terabits of capacity on the Internet plus hundreds of nodes installed
> direct
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> anyone know whats going on with plusnet?
>
> No one answering the support lines and nothing online other than the usual
> 'status monitor' of twitter folks across the uk commenting they are diwn too
Hi there,
Plusnet are posting some deta
Hi there,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Rich Lewis wrote:
> I guess a brief list of requirements are:
>
> FTTC or equivalent speeds (I'm in a London suburb, so Virgin are in the
> street and fibre is to the cabinent, but not, alas, to the premises)
> Native IPv6 definitely a plus, if not now
Hi,
You can see an idea of what has been blocked in the UK at
http://www.ukispcourtorders.co.uk/. This is the website that the
largest ISP in the UK (BT) redirects the 'blocked' sites to if you try
and access them. It isn't some sort of hidden blocklist; it is public
who has obtained injunctions
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Charlie Boisseau
wrote:
>> good news, possibly.
>
> Possibly. If they get the regulated regions right. There’s a risk Ofcom
> stifle future investment in other/new networks by doing this. If we don’t
> want to always just be stuck with BT, other operators nee
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Rich Lewis wrote:
> I wondered if anyone on the list could recommend an organisation to do
> some penetration testing for us. We've used Pen Test Partners in the
> past, and they seemed pretty good to me, but for reasons unknown the
> auditors want us to u
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Tom Bird wrote:
> Evening,
>
> To set the scene, my parents live in a village. It's sort of an L shape,
> and has just gained a shiny new BT FTTC box, somewhere around the corner of
> the L.
>
> Houses down one leg of the L seem able to order this service, but
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Panny Malialis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone with a clue from Virgin media (broadband) on this list by any
> chance please?
>
> I'm at my wits end with their tech support and losing the will to live. This
> is my last ditch attempt to resolve it before an ofcom complai
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Gavin Henry wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What's the latest?
>
To be honest the best public information seems to be coming out of The Register:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/11/25/telecity_fix_fails_again/
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/11/25/telecity_sovereign_hous
Hi,
On 15 December 2015 at 09:49, Dave Taht wrote:
> I am curious if there is some sort of igmp or other form of message
> that would reliably detect if a switch had a bridge on it. How could
> deviceA and B detect deviceC was a bridge in this case?
>
> deviceA -> ethernet switch -> deviceB
>
On 15 December 2015 at 13:27, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 15/12/2015 13:21, Alex Brooks wrote:
>> I know that Bradford Networks will sell you a system that does this
>> automatically with HP and Cisco gear. I don't know how it actually
>> 'works' under the hood
On 20 July 2016 at 13:42, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>
> Any news on today's BT outage?
>
> My ISP is heartily blaming this for all sorts of ills.
Telecity Harbour Exchange 8/9 has been having some power issues - a
UPS decided to fall over, kit all over the shop has had a power cut
with some power subs
On 11 July 2017 at 14:30, Oliver Stirling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if there is someone that can help, for our BT customers (and
> possibly TalkTalk) any DNS lookup for hosting.cloudnext.net is returning a
> different IP (92.242.132.15) instead of the correct IP (79.170.44.8)
I have had a poke of
15 matches
Mail list logo
