Hey Folks,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Rodolfo S. Carvalho
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Rodolfo S. Carvalho
>>> wrote:
Guilherme,
On Mon, Fe
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Rodolfo S. Carvalho
>> wrote:
>>> Guilherme,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:11 A
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Rodolfo S. Carvalho
> wrote:
>> Guilherme,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Rodolfo S. Carvalho
>>> wrote:
I've found already w
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Rodolfo S. Carvalho
wrote:
> Guilherme,
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Rodolfo S. Carvalho
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've found already what is going wrong. Windows services doesn't load
>>> the PATH envir
Guilherme,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Rodolfo S. Carvalho
> wrote:
>>
>> I've found already what is going wrong. Windows services doesn't load
>> the PATH environment variable, and then UmitWeb cannot find where nmap
>> is just exec
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Rodolfo S. Carvalho
wrote:
>
> I've found already what is going wrong. Windows services doesn't load
> the PATH environment variable, and then UmitWeb cannot find where nmap
> is just executing "nmap".
> I'm writing a modification in the windows installer to includ
Rodolfo,
I tested your installer on windows xp, and I have some remarks:
1 - By the end of the installer, it shows a message with a typo, in
which I believe you meant to say fine instead of find.
2 - I tried to run a scan and it showed the following:
Response Code:500
Message: Nmap command rais
Hi Adriano!
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Adriano Marques wrote:
> Rodolfo,
>
> I tested your installer on windows xp, and I have some remarks:
>
> 1 - By the end of the installer, it shows a message with a typo, in
> which I believe you meant to say fine instead of find.
Ok, I'll correct the
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "management_console.pyw", line 7, in
File "umitWeb\WebPaths.pyo", line 22, in
File "umitCore\Paths.pyo", line 29, in
File "umitCore\UmitLogging.pyo", line 25, in
File "umitCore\UmitOptionParser.pyo", line 26, in
File "umitCore\I18N.pyo", line
Hi all!
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Francesco Piccinno wrote:
> Yes, you could build it but you have to download deps like winpcap for
> vista, NSIS, scapy from secdev.org (unpack that in the directory where
> PacketManipulator file is located) and gtk-dev with mingw c++ to build
> moo exten
Yes, you could build it but you have to download deps like winpcap for
vista, NSIS, scapy from secdev.org (unpack that in the directory where
PacketManipulator file is located) and gtk-dev with mingw c++ to build
moo extensions. Adjust the PATH to have make,g++,etc.. and then run
generate_installer
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Francesco Piccinno wrote:
> I don't have time to create the windows binary. If someone has time to
> spend in trying.
> Btw I've released a new source tarball at least. The link is:
>
>
> http://trac.umitproject.org/attachment/wiki/PacketManipulator/PacketManipula
I don't have time to create the windows binary. If someone has time to
spend in trying.
Btw I've released a new source tarball at least. The link is:
http://trac.umitproject.org/attachment/wiki/PacketManipulator/PacketManipulator-0.2-RC2.tar.bz2?format=raw
I've tagged it as second release candida
> > I finished merge trunk against my branch of InterfaceEditor. Should I
merge
> > it against trunk and commit?
>
> Great news. Sure you should, and then we can try it further and find
> possible bugs or integration defects.
>
> > About release:
> >
> > Today is a milestone to release the next ver
> I finished merge trunk against my branch of InterfaceEditor. Should I merge
> it against trunk and commit?
Great news. Sure you should, and then we can try it further and find
possible bugs or integration defects.
> About release:
>
> Today is a milestone to release the next version of Umit (0.
Hi Everybody!
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Luis A. Bastiao Silva
wrote:
> Guilherme,
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
>>
>> Can you restate your intentions ? When I started reading "About the
>> release:..." it seemed that the alpha release was going to happen
>> to
Guilherme,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
> Can you restate your intentions ? When I started reading "About the
> release:..." it seemed that the alpha release was going to happen
> today (supposing 72:00 o'clock is changed to something else), then
> next you said about b
Can you restate your intentions ? When I started reading "About the
release:..." it seemed that the alpha release was going to happen
today (supposing 72:00 o'clock is changed to something else), then
next you said about building tarballs only on Saturday. Is the alpha
happening today or saturday ?
Hi There,
I finished merge trunk against my branch of InterfaceEditor. Should I merge
it against trunk and commit?
---
About release:
Today is a milestone to release the next version of Umit (0.97 alpha ) or
whatever.
I was thinking and may be we should release, it today at 72:00 o'clo
19 matches
Mail list logo
