Re: Two questions about unattended

2009-01-11 Thread Johannes Bauer
Harm schrieb: >> $u->{'_temp'}->{'scan_windrivers'} = ''; >> $u->{'_temp'}->{'scan_windrivers_path'} = "z:\site\win_drivers" ; >> $u->{'_meta'}->{'ntinstall_cmd'} = '/z/site/nt5x-install' ; >> > for some reason i have commented the first 2 lines out in my config, > leaving only the line about nt5x

Re: Two questions about unattended

2009-01-11 Thread Johannes Bauer
Hey there, Harm schrieb: >> $u->{'_temp'}->{'scan_windrivers'} = ''; >> $u->{'_temp'}->{'scan_windrivers_path'} = "z:\site\win_drivers" ; >> $u->{'_meta'}->{'ntinstall_cmd'} = '/z/site/nt5x-install' ; >> > for some reason i have commented the first 2 lines out in my config, > leaving only the lin

Re: Two questions about unattended

2009-01-11 Thread Harm
Hi, On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 23:55 +0100, Johannes Bauer wrote: > Harm schrieb: > > and doublecheck if your scripts are +x. Logs from search-windrivers.pl > > can be found in /c/netinst/logs/ > > OK, tried that - now I see that nt5x-install is executed as the very > last step. However, the drivers a

Re: Two questions about unattended

2009-01-11 Thread Johannes Bauer
Harm schrieb: > and doublecheck if your scripts are +x. Logs from search-windrivers.pl > can be found in /c/netinst/logs/ OK, tried that - now I see that nt5x-install is executed as the very last step. However, the drivers are neither searched (if I can tell) nor installed. nt5x-install and searc

Re: Two questions about unattended

2009-01-11 Thread Harm
and doublecheck if your scripts are +x. Logs from search-windrivers.pl can be found in /c/netinst/logs/ - Harm On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 15:29 -0500, Eric Feldhusen wrote: > Johannes Bauer wrote: > > Since I cannot find the URL > > (http://unattended.sourceforge.net/testing/48_rc5/unattended-4.8rc5.

Re: Two questions about unattended

2009-01-11 Thread Eric Feldhusen
Johannes Bauer wrote: > Since I cannot find the URL > (http://unattended.sourceforge.net/testing/48_rc5/unattended-4.8rc5.zip > is a 404) I patched against 4.7. http://unattended.sourceforge.net/testing/48rc5/unattended-4.8.zip Eric ---

Re: Two questions about unattended

2009-01-11 Thread Johannes Bauer
Harm schrieb: > at that /testing url you found there is a zipfile with the 4.8rc5 files. > The windows driver script works way better then putting all stuff in the > correct dir by your self since it will 'install' the correct driver > fully automatically :) Yes, it indeed sound pretty cool :-)

Re: Two questions about unattended

2009-01-11 Thread Harm
Hi, at that /testing url you found there is a zipfile with the 4.8rc5 files. The windows driver script works way better then putting all stuff in the correct dir by your self since it will 'install' the correct driver fully automatically :) regards On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 16:50 +0100, Johannes Bau

Re: Two questions about unattended

2009-01-11 Thread Johannes Bauer
Harm schrieb: > Even better, use this to take care of windows driver installation: > http://www.mail-archive.com/unattended-devel% > 40lists.sourceforge.net/msg01758.html Ah, I I just saw I misread it - it says it only works with linuxboot (which I'm using). I'll try it out right now. Kind regard

Re: Two questions about unattended

2009-01-11 Thread Johannes Bauer
Harm schrieb: > > Even better, use this to take care of windows driver installation: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/unattended-devel% > > 40lists.sourceforge.net/msg01758.html This looks wonderful - exactly what I might need. I'll have to switch to the DOS version, I guess, don't I? The patch goe

Re: Two questions about unattended

2009-01-11 Thread Johannes Bauer
Tim Bates schrieb: > > Johannes Bauer wrote: >> >> 1. The NIC of my PC is not supported by Windows, I have to install a >> >> driver. However I'd have to do that before the post-install starts >> >> (which wants to access //unattended/...) - is there a way to slipstream >> >> network drivers? > > Y

Re: Two questions about unattended

2009-01-10 Thread Harm
Even better, use this to take care of windows driver installation: http://www.mail-archive.com/unattended-devel% 40lists.sourceforge.net/msg01758.html Parted is better then fdisk and packs some more features aswell (like support for GPT tables). There is no need to for fdisk since all partitioning

Re: Two questions about unattended

2009-01-10 Thread Tim Bates
Johannes Bauer wrote: > 1. The NIC of my PC is not supported by Windows, I have to install a > driver. However I'd have to do that before the post-install starts > (which wants to access //unattended/...) - is there a way to slipstream > network drivers? Yes. Read this article instead of the txtset

Two questions about unattended

2009-01-10 Thread Johannes Bauer
Hello guys, first off, thanks for making unattended, it's some great work! I have had some spare time and a PC which I do not currently use and tried tweaking and fiddling around with it. Installed XP about 10 times on there so far... I'm having two problems/questions however: 1. The NIC of my PC