RE: Wordprocessors in Korean

2001-07-26 Thread Seuk Soo Sung
First of all, I am sorry that I couldn't reponse quickly because of personal matter last week. On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Jungshik Shin wrote: JS> Which is the case? Does MS Word 2000 support all 1.6M syllables or just a subset (about 5000)? JS> Perhaps, about 5000 of them are supported with pre-com

RE: Locale codes (WAS: RE: RTF language codes)

2001-07-26 Thread Carl W. Brown
Daniel, Technically you are correct. A "nn_NO" value is not proper since "NO" is redundant. But it will be used. I should have said POSIX style locales since there is a difference between "ja_JP.Shift_JIS" and "ja_JP.EUC-JP" or between "fr_FR" and "fr_FR@EURO". I will go one step further and

RE: Panose, Is it an open standard?

2001-07-26 Thread Figge, Donald
The rights to Panose were acquired by Hewlett Packard several years ago. However, I understand that HP no longer supports the Panose system. Donald Figge // Anyhow - could you help me in finding out, who owns the Panose standard today? Is it an open standard? Regards Norbert Schade

Re: Locale codes (WAS: RE: RTF language codes)

2001-07-26 Thread Daniel Biddle
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 01:04:29AM -0700, Yves Arrouye wrote: > > If you have a cross platform system you should use RFC 1766 > > style locales > > between systems and convert them to LCIDs on Windows. > > RFC 3066 was published in January. Check it out. > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3066.txt No

Re: Panose, Is it an open standard?

2001-07-26 Thread James Kass
Panose data is stored in the "OS/2" table of TrueType or OpenType fonts. >From the OpenType specifications at Microsoft's Typography site: "International: Additional specifications are required for PANOSE to classify non Latin character sets." "The Panose values are fully described in the Panos

Re: FW: Panose, Is it an open standard?

2001-07-26 Thread Patrick Durusau
Magda, The information at: PANOSE: An Ideal Typeface Matching System for the Web http://www.w3.org/Printing/stevahn.html is fairly dated (4/22/96) but might be a starting point for more information. Patrick > "Magda Danish (Unicode)" wrote: > > Any info on the subject would be greatly apprec

FW: Panose, Is it an open standard?

2001-07-26 Thread Magda Danish (Unicode)
Title: Message Any info on the subject would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Magda.     -Original Message-From: Norbert Schade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:11 AMTo: Magda Danish (Unicode)Subject: Panose Magda, Panose is a kind of font classification s

List of languages & scripts

2001-07-26 Thread Rick McGowan
One of the questions asked most frequently is whether Unicode encodes some particular language. As most of you know, Unicode doesn't encode "languages", it encodes scripts. But the thing people often most want to know is whether their language, or some other language, can be represented.

RE: Korean GooGyeol (was RE: Wordprocessors in Korean)

2001-07-26 Thread Seuk Soo Sung
It looks like a bit early to discuss GooGyeul at this point. I will contact someone who are actively working for Non-standard character registration in Korea and will be back. Thanks SeuksooS -Original Message- From: Jungshik Shin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 200

Locale codes (WAS: RE: RTF language codes)

2001-07-26 Thread Yves Arrouye
> If you have a cross platform system you should use RFC 1766 > style locales > between systems and convert them to LCIDs on Windows. RFC 3066 was published in January. Check it out. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3066.txt YA