Ram Viswanadha wrote:
2) RA+HALANT+INV = RAsup
(RA+HALANT+ZWJ is treated
as Eyelash RA which is may not be the desired effect)
I have pointed out this problem several times but, so far, there was no
reply. I hope that you are more successful in bringing this to the
Theo Venker wrote:
I'd like to make a few remarks about the UCD files.
First of all, while I'd like to thank Theo for going to the
trouble of checking the data files so carefully, and coming
up with some genuine errors in the data, I have a couple of
comments for people who are checking and
Theo Veenker scripsit:
o UnicodeData-3.2.0.txt still uses this notation:
1234;Blah, First;Lo;0;L;N;
5678;Blah, Last;Lo;0;L;N;
instead of
1234..5678;Blah, First..Blah, Last;Lo;0;L;N;
Since all other UCD files use the latter notation why
With a small improvement to the single-byte loop, the BOCU-1 converter became faster.
This improves especially the speed for Latin text conversion.
Please see new numbers at http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/dropbox/bocuperf.html
markus
Asmus,
At 01:03 PM 4/5/02 -0800, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
That is how it already works for the IUC papers we have posted. We're
not claiming any joint copyright on those.
Yes, actually the conference does.
O.k. yes, you're right. I see that that is how Barbara is doing
the Proceedings. She
Hi,
Just fyi, I have updated my example page for business use for Unicode.
http://www.geocities.com/i18nguy/unicode-example.html
Mostly I cleaned up the formatting and moved the contributors column to
an acknowledgement at the end of the page.
I also moved more of the doc to use CSS for styling.
At 01:48 PM 4/5/02 -0800, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
I disagree about this -- and still think Rick has it right.
Part of this difference in viewpoint may come from your apparent
viewing of Technical Notes as a breeding ground for little
Technical Reports that aren't quite ripe yet.
Or script
Munzir Taha wrote:
Third, I am still searching for the right font but can't find it yet. Can
you help me?
I was looking at some old type book, specifically at the Linotype Pi
characters catalog, and they apparently had an Arabic Maths Pi family
with two fonts. Those fonts have mirorred
Marco,
Why do you say that these are not round-trip compatible?
The point I was trying to make is conversion of INV-ZWJ can be thought as
being kind of fallback, you might be able to roundtrip in most cases but
not all. I do agree the conversions you pointed out can be roundtripped. But
does
Have you checked out http://www.unicode.org/unicode/faq/indic.html#16?
Mark
—
Γνῶθι σαυτόν — Θαλῆς
[For transliteration, see http://oss.software.ibm.com/cgi-bin/icu/tr]
http://www.macchiato.com
- Original Message -
From: Ram Viswanadha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marco Cimarosti [EMAIL
10 matches
Mail list logo
