Theo Veenker scripsit: > o UnicodeData-3.2.0.txt still uses this notation: > 1234;<Blah, First>;Lo;0;L;;;;;N;;;;; > 5678;<Blah, Last>;Lo;0;L;;;;;N;;;;; > instead of > 1234..5678;<Blah, First>..<Blah, Last>;Lo;0;L;;;;;N;;;;; > Since all other UCD files use the latter notation why not change this > one too? IMHO backward compatibility with existing UCD file parsers > shouldn't be an issue in this particular case.
I definitely depend on this property, not that I couldn't change my code, but why? -- John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.reutershealth.com I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
