Does the Unicode Standard specify an upper limit to the length of a
character's Unicode Name?
Kevin
Scríobh Philippe Verdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
Language variants are not distinct because of a national border
ut because a long history of separation of peoples and atachment
of peoples to an origin culture in times of political conflicts or repressions.
...
That is true. As a
From my experience, the default Windows GUI fonts on Win 2000 / XP are: MS
UI Gothic (Japanese with Proportional Latin half-width characters),
PMingLiu (Traditional Chinese with Proportional Latin half-width
characters), and Simsun (Simplified Chinese Fixed).
A problem I have found is that on
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 21:51:26 +0930, Kevin Brown wrote:
Does the Unicode Standard specify an upper limit to the length of a
character's Unicode Name?
See Annex L Character naming guidelines of ISO/IEC 10646-1: 2000
(unfortunately not easily available over the net, which is a shame as you have
Philippe Verdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2003 07:25:46 AM:
How do you consider the existing hook diacritic ?
If you're talking about U+0309 COMBINING HOOK ABOVE, I don't think it
normally attaches. In fact, it's combining class is 230 'above' and not 214
'above attached'.
Attached
I ask the patience of the Unicode and IETF-L moderators for now posting
on their lists this request for contact details for the ISO 3166 mailing
lists (if any).
Context: Ireland advisability of reserving 'EI' tag for cited usage
(baggage-handling at international airports) and the fact I am
Scríobh Misha Wolf:
The full details of all the codes are available in a very nice
table at:
http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/02iso-3166-code-lists/
iso_3166-1_decoding_table.html
...
Misha
Thanks. As Head of successive NSAI ISO Delegations I used to keep rafts
of such refs,
Jim Allan wrote:
Kent Karlsson posted on the use of slashed zero for empty set:
Yes... A horrible glyph for denoting the empty set, if I may say so.
No
offence intended. Please use the glyph available via the command
\varnothing (a misleading name...) in the amssymb package;
or
Sorry, may be I was chosing the wrong diacritic (I was confused by its name, and I
should have verified in the charts).
Isn't U+0316 COMBINING HORN (combining class 216) what I wanted to use?
Disregard my comments with HOOK and consider HORN instead. This is not a great
difference as this
On 2003.05.06, 19:41, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin scripsit:
U+0344 (oops -- the atter is not canonical; speaking of which:
why U+310 isn't decomposable as U+0306 U+0301?...)
It used to be, but when normalization came in, the concept of
decomposable
Sorry, may be I was chosing the wrong diacritic (I was
confused by its name, and I should have verified in the charts).
Isn't U+0316 COMBINING HORN (combining class 216) what I
wanted to use?
Let me cut my reply short: no.
...
script which already has a lot of them and creates
At 06:39 AM 6/3/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philippe Verdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2003 07:25:46 AM:
How do you consider the existing hook diacritic ?
If you're talking about U+0309 COMBINING HOOK ABOVE, I don't think it
normally attaches. In fact, it's combining class is 230
From: Marion Gunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I ask the patience of the Unicode and IETF-L moderators for now posting
on their lists this request for contact details for the ISO 3166 mailing
lists (if any).
Context: Ireland advisability of reserving 'EI' tag for cited usage
(baggage-handling at
At 16:16 +0100 2003-06-03, Marion Gunn wrote:
Thanks. As Head of successive NSAI ISO Delegations I used to keep
rafts of such refs, many of which need updating now, which is why
dedicated mailing lists, where such exist, are most likely to help.
For the record, Marion Gunn resigned from her
Scríobh Philippe Verdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
Shamely, the official ISO3166-1 code for United Kingdom is GB, not UK
which is just a IANA assignment, both of which include Northern Ireland,
and also other UK dependancies (but only in ISO3166-1, because IANA
defines separate codes for
From: Kent Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, may be I was chosing the wrong diacritic (I was
confused by its name, and I should have verified in the charts).
Isn't U+0316 COMBINING HORN (combining class 216) what I
wanted to use?
Let me cut my reply short: no.
...
script which
From: John Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 06:39 AM 6/3/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philippe Verdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2003 07:25:46 AM:
How do you consider the existing hook diacritic ?
If you're talking about U+0309 COMBINING HOOK ABOVE, I don't think it
normally
Philippe Verdy wrote...
Sorry, may be I was chosing the wrong diacritic (I was confused by its name,
and I should have verified in the charts).
Isn't U+0316 COMBINING HORN (combining class 216) what I wanted to use?
If you mean Combining Horn that is U+031B. Combining horn *does* attach.
Michael Everson scripsit:
Thanks. As Head of successive NSAI ISO Delegations I used to keep
rafts of such refs, many of which need updating now, which is why
dedicated mailing lists, where such exist, are most likely to help.
For the record, Marion Gunn resigned from her participation in
Oh Dear! I sense an acute rise in the ambient temperature of this list.
Now, Children, please play nicely or I may drain the pool and send
you all home to read Miss Manners.
Your maternal,
-- Sarasvati
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:25:23PM +0200, Philippe Verdy wrote:
When Unix/Linux reads a CDROM catalog, most often it will first
display a RockRidge catalog if present (which allows mapping UFS
semantics and attriutes), ignoring the Joliet catalog, and then
fallback to the basic ISO9660
Does anyone know how to persuade Mutt (on stock Red Hat Linux 8.0) to
treat 8859-1 as default? It insists on displaying either \xxx escapes
(when LC_CTYPE is en-US.UTF-8) or question marks (in all other cases).
It's not the xterm, as I have proved by running a Perl program to
output #xA0 to #xFF.
Pim Blokland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all,
I have got a stupid question - that is, the question was asked
of me
and I didn't know what to say.
What is ISO 10646?
Usually I can asnwer questions like this by doing an Internet
search, but in this case, I get varying answers:
it is a code
Hi All,
Ive some query on how JDBC is supposed to convert
encoding of characters while updating/selecting multibyte
strings to/from a Database supporting Unicode characters. The specific queries
are like
Where
from the JDBC driver is supposed to get the encoding of the target
Folks,
It is getting to be that time...for the Fall Unicode Conference. Please
join us in Atlanta, GA. See all the details below.
Best regards,
Lisa
Twenty-fourth Internationalization and Unicode Conference
Hi All,
Ive some query on how JDBC is
supposed to convert encoding of characters while updating/selecting multibyte strings
to/from a Database supporting Unicode characters. The specific queries are like
1. Where from
the JDBC driver is supposed to get the encoding of the target
26 matches
Mail list logo
