On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:25:23PM +0200, Philippe Verdy wrote: > When Unix/Linux reads a CDROM catalog, most often it will first > display a RockRidge catalog if present (which allows mapping UFS > semantics and attriutes), ignoring the Joliet catalog, and then > fallback to the basic ISO9660 catalog.
Not true. Linux reads Joliet catalogs if a RockRidge catalog can't be found. I'm not sure how it deals with Unicode, but I believe the utf8 option in /etc/fstab will let you set this. > If the Windows output is "garbled", it just means that the Joliet > extension created by your Linux tool is not correctly encoded Using mkisofs, -input-charset needs to be used to set the filesystem character set. > So it > is much better to create CDROMs that use only the portable ISO9660 > format, Why? RockRidge and Joliet work just fine. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ic s�t me on anum leahtrice, �a com heo and b�t me!
