On Tuesday, July 01, 2003 1:55 PM, Kent Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My feeling about the proposed Public Review document should
exclude the ij ligature, waiting for the decision about the new
dotless-ij ligature approved in the first rounds by UTC and
waiting for approval by ISO
Michael Everson schreef:
I think the answer is, regarding the soft dot property, please
leave
the ij ligature alone.
And I think not.
When putting accents on the (which does happen!), the dots must
go. Simple as that.
Maybe it was a bad idea to include as a character in Unicode at
all, but
Pim Blokland wrote:
When putting accents on the (which does happen!), the dots must
go. Simple as that.
Where should the accent be placed in that case? Should the accent be
centered over ij? Should there be one accent over i and then the
same over j? Or should the accent only be an accent
On Tuesday, July 01, 2003 4:09 PM, Pim Blokland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe it was a bad idea to include as a character in Unicode at
all, but now it's there, there's no reason to ignore it when
refining the rules, to deprecate it practically.
No, that was needed for correct Dutch support.
FYI
I wrote a little program for other standards activities to check which Unicode characters have
simple lower-/uppercase mappings across UTF-8 length boundaries (0080, 0800, 1).
This is with Unicode 4 data.
I thought some unicode subscribers might be interested in the result.
Best
Markus,
This is interesting. Do you know why Unicode decided that these
signs should have case-ness (?)? The lower case of the Ohm sign does not
make sense to me. What could that mean?
From: Markus Scherer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 1:30 PM
To: unicode
Subject:
The Ohm sign is canonically equivalent to an Omega (U+03A9), and similar for Kelvin and Angstrom.
They are the same characters in practice (except for 1:1 codepage mappings) and need to be treated
the same.
From UnicodeData.txt:
2126;OHM SIGN;Lu;0;L;03A9N;OHM;;;03C9;
212A;KELVIN
honestly, i know that this is not the procedure to do it. but i dont
know otherwise...i went to unicode.org to unsubscribe, looks like it
ONLY works with outlook(which i dont have) as it has some different way
of unsubscribing (sending an auto email from the default mail acct i
guess)
can the
Philippe Verdy verdy_p at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
Maybe it was a bad idea to include as a character in Unicode at
all, but now it's there, there's no reason to ignore it when
refining the rules, to deprecate it practically.
No, that was needed for correct Dutch support. Look at the case
Why the moderator?
As far as I know _every_ member of the list can do that for you :-)
- Original Message -
From: akbar pasha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:00 AM
Subject: unsubscribe???
honestly, i know that this is not the procedure to do
Philippe Verdy wrote on 06/28/2003 02:48:01 AM:
If the user strikes the two keys patah and hiriq, the input method
for Traditional Hebrew will generate patah,CGJ,hiriq
That requires* an input method that is aware of the input context (or of
what has already been input -- but awareness of
11 matches
Mail list logo
