Michael Everson schreef: > I think the answer is, regarding the soft dot property, please leave > the ij ligature alone.
And I think not. When putting accents on the ij (which does happen!), the dots must go. Simple as that. Maybe it was a bad idea to include ij as a character in Unicode at all, but now it's there, there's no reason to ignore it when refining the rules, to deprecate it practically. Pim Blokland
