Re: Much better Latin-1 keyboard for Windows

2004-07-22 Thread Michael Everson
At 18:44 -0400 2004-07-22, John Cowan wrote: Michael Everson scripsit: Please see the specification of the Irish Extended keyboard for Unicode, at http://www.evertype.com/celtscript/ga-keys-x.html Interesting. There seems to be no explanation of the seven keyboard states shown in the graphic at

Re: Much better Latin-1 keyboard for Windows

2004-07-22 Thread John Cowan
Michael Everson scripsit: > Please see the specification of the Irish > Extended keyboard for Unicode, at > http://www.evertype.com/celtscript/ga-keys-x.html Interesting. There seems to be no explanation of the seven keyboard states shown in the graphic at ga-keys-x.gif. Can you explicate the

Re: Much better Latin-1 keyboard for Windows

2004-07-22 Thread Michael Everson
At 16:38 -0400 2004-07-22, Alain LaBonté wrote: It would have been nice if this keyboard would have been based (for its second layout) on ISO/IEC 9995-3 International Standard. The latter is based on the following philosophy: -Group 1 is the national (or prefered layout) [in the USA that would

Re: Much better Latin-1 keyboard for Windows

2004-07-22 Thread Alain LaBonté
À 02:32 2004-07-18, John Cowan a écrit: http://www.livejournal.com/users/gwalla/39856.html is a page about (and a link to) a truly excellent Windows keyboard driver that provides full access to the Latin-1 range but is completely compatible with the US-ASCII keyboard except for AltGr (the right Alt

Re: I didn't send the virus

2004-07-22 Thread Rick McGowan
Doug wrote... > This didn't come from me. Indeed, it didn't come from Doug. And it has been removed from the archives as well. FYI... We have some software in place on Unicode.ORG to assist with filtering of attachments. However, we pass through ".zip" files because many of us who work wit

Unsubscribe

2004-07-22 Thread 100272 (Harish Ramachandra Reddy)
Please  unsubscribe.   Harish Ramachandra Reddy Infosys Technologies Limited Ph: 080-51058113   080-31838287  

Re: Ogham and Initialisms

2004-07-22 Thread Andrew C. West
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:24:17 +0200, fantasai wrote: > > If a Latin initialism appears in a bottom-to-top text > and the characters are oriented upright rather than > rotated, should the initialism read up or down? > >UA >S or S ? >AU > In traditional monumental

Re: Ogham and Initialisms

2004-07-22 Thread Michael Everson
At 11:24 +0200 2004-07-22, fantasai wrote: If a Latin initialism A what? appears in a bottom-to-top text and the characters are oriented upright rather than rotated, should the initialism read up or down? UA S or S ? AU In addition to the anachronism in this particular

Ogham and Initialisms

2004-07-22 Thread fantasai
If a Latin initialism appears in a bottom-to-top text and the characters are oriented upright rather than rotated, should the initialism read up or down? UA S or S ? AU ~fantasai -- http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact

I didn't send the virus

2004-07-22 Thread Doug Ewell
Unicode Digest V4 #206 included the following: > Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:33:47 -0500 > From: "Dewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: > ... This didn't come from me. Any e-mail I send from this address will have my name as "Doug Ewell", not "Dewell" as this message shows. (Plus, I don't se