On 2011-07-20 at 15:10 Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
Definitely the madda above the vowel, to take care of Koranic scenarios.
For example, some annotation styles of the Koran may commonly include
the sequence to indicate an elongated [u:] sound.
There, the madda clearly goes over the damma.
Than
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 02:42:32PM -0500, Bob Hallissy wrote:
> Wondering if anyone knows (or has an educated guess):
>
> When an Arabic combining character sequence includes both
>
> * U+0653 ARABIC MADDAH ABOVE and
> * an Arabic vowel mark above (e.g., U+064E ARABIC FATHA or maybe
>U+065A
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 14:42 -0500, Bob Hallissy wrote:
> Wondering if anyone knows (or has an educated guess):
>
> When an Arabic combining character sequence includes both
> * U+0653 ARABIC MADDAH ABOVE and
> * an Arabic vowel mark above (e.g., U+064E ARABIC FATHA or maybe
>
Wondering if anyone knows (or has an educated guess):
When an Arabic combining character sequence includes both
* U+0653 ARABIC MADDAH ABOVE and
* an Arabic vowel mark above (e.g., U+064E ARABIC FATHA or maybe
U+065A ARABIC VOWEL SIGN SMALL V ABOVE),
should the maddah be rendered above the
2011/7/18 Asmus Freytag :
> On 7/17/2011 12:19 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>>
>> Another alternative: instead of encoding separate symbols for each
>> control, we could as well encode symbols for each character visible in
>> those symbols.
>
> I'm baffled: what problem is this elaborate scheme trying
5 matches
Mail list logo