Re: FAQ entry (was: Looking for information on the UnicodeData file)

2003-03-07 Thread John H. Jenkins
ages often have different perceptions of what a symbol is. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: The display of *kholam* on PCs

2003-03-06 Thread John H. Jenkins
having competing OSes is for everybody to simply switch over to Windows, either. The best *short-term* solution is for someone to tell them that if they're interested, they can contact us directly and we'll see what we can work out. We could probably work out AAT support for their specific font without too much trouble. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Unihan DB / kKarlgren / kFrequency.

2003-02-25 Thread John H. Jenkins
, the meaning of these numbers. Roughly, characters with a frequency of 1 are more commonly used than those with a frequency of 2, and so on. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'

2003-02-19 Thread John H. Jenkins
should use the loopy form to ensure appropriate contrast with the straight form used for U+03D5. What annotation in 3.2 do you feel is incorrect? ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Finding a font that contains a particular character

2003-02-17 Thread John H. Jenkins
e the character palette (in the keyboard menu) or install Apple's font tools <http://developer.apple.com/fonts> and use ftxinstalledfonts with the -U option. Both of these work with astral characters. ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Everson Mono

2003-02-16 Thread John H. Jenkins
gt;, which works on Mac OS X and can handle the astral planes. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Converting old TrueType fonts to Unicode

2003-02-14 Thread John H. Jenkins
this purpose. For people on Mac OS X, there is a set of tools available for download from <http://developer.apple.com/fonts/> which, like TTX, can decompile table from TrueType and OpenType fonts and let the user edit the results. These *do* support astral characters. ====== John

Re: traditional vs simplified chinese

2003-02-13 Thread John H. Jenkins
There are some ideographs (e.g., anything with the bone radical) which have different appearance in simplified and traditional Chinese, even though the two have been unified in Unicode. Identifying a text as simplified vs. traditional could help in automatic font selection. == John

Re: VS vs. P14 (was Re: Indic Devanagari Query)

2003-02-06 Thread John H. Jenkins
plain text. ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: 4701

2003-02-01 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Google, "year of the goat" has the lead. Systran has sheep. KangXi says (if I'm understanding it correctly) something like "animal with curved horns." (It's more complex than that, but I think I caught the essence.) == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: unicode in Mac

2003-01-26 Thread John H. Jenkins
. Otherwise any of the free Greek fonts on the Internet would work. On Mac OS 9, the situation is a bit grimmer, as there aren't many Unicode-savvy applications. SUE would be one option. You should be able to find it using Google. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Small Latin Letter m with Macron

2003-01-16 Thread John H. Jenkins
for "on," and so on. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: newbie 18030 font question

2003-01-16 Thread John H. Jenkins
pages. Well, not from Apple's, anyway. Several GB18030 fonts come with Mac OS X 10.2, but we don't have a license to make them freely downloadable. ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Small Latin Letter m with Macron

2003-01-16 Thread John H. Jenkins
mimics this style of handwriting and uses such abbreviations, then you would need the font to ligate "mm" sequences into a *glyph* showing an "m" with an overbar. Remembering, of course, to use ZWNJ to mark places where this ligature may not be used. == John H. Jenkins

Re: Status of Unihan Mandarin readings?

2002-12-20 Thread John H. Jenkins
. Yes, this is something we do now. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Status of Unihan Mandarin readings?

2002-12-20 Thread John H. Jenkins
93. That's because the file was converted to UTF-8. Previously it had not been in any single encoding, which was creating problems. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Status of Unihan Mandarin readings?

2002-12-19 Thread John H. Jenkins
d an important adjunct to the Unihan database, I'm not sure I'd want to use these readings if I were developing a commercial-grade product or writing a scholarly treatise. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: CJK fonts

2002-12-11 Thread John H. Jenkins
ookup Web page at <http://www.unicode.org/charts/unihan.html>. ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Unihan Mandarin Readings

2002-12-07 Thread John H. Jenkins
so that people don't have to rewrite their perl scripts and other parsers. I know you're asking if we could add an XML format *in addition* to the non-XML one, but given the size of Unihan.txt, that isn't likely. ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: Unihan Mandarin Readings

2002-12-02 Thread John H. Jenkins
Is it possible to regenerate the Unihan database with the correct secondary Mandarin readings ? Certainly in the Unicode 4.0 time-frame we can improve things. I can't make any guarantees, however. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Why isn't my character displaying

2002-11-29 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Friday, November 29, 2002, at 05:23 AM, Theodore H. Smith wrote: What is wrong? Is it something to do with font fallbacks? I am not touching font fallbacks at all. All I did was set the FontID for my ATSUStyle object, to that for Monaco plain. I'm a bit stuck here, can someone help? I thou

Re: ATSUI for MacOS9

2002-11-20 Thread John H. Jenkins
ll, could you please contact me so I can ask a few more questions? Thanks a lot. You could send my questions to me and I can have them circulated to the proper people. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: The result of the plane 14 tag characters review.

2002-11-14 Thread John H. Jenkins
nt, point size, and other typographic preferences. Indeed, it becomes inconvenient to have them in a different layer as it means that the client has to do *two* levels of processing to derive this information, rather than just one. = John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: N2515: Request for Roadmap - plane 3

2002-11-13 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 03:22 AM, Andrew C. West wrote: On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 02:03:27 -0800 (PST), "John H. Jenkins" wrote: Nope. We're still doing modern stuff. Well, there's no rush, just as long as you get round to it sometime ... how about reservin

Re: N2515: Request for Roadmap - plane 3

2002-11-12 Thread John H. Jenkins
t goes to show how much *I* know.) Oracle bone forms and other older versions of the Han ideographs are something we haven't even got a good model for how to handle yet. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Info: Apple OSX Font Tools Suite 1.0.0 Released

2002-11-12 Thread John H. Jenkins
Try control-clicking on the link and then selecting "Save link to disk" from the popup menu. On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 09:55 AM, Dean Snyder wrote: At 4:49 PM John H. Jenkins wrote: Cupertino 11/8/02: Today the Apple Font Group released its new suite of Unix command line

Info: Apple OSX Font Tools Suite 1.0.0 Released

2002-11-11 Thread John H. Jenkins
Apple Font Tool Suite Manual (51 pages) * Tool Quick Reference (8 pages) * Tutorial (62 pages) * Tutorial Command Summary (8 pages) == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: ct, fj and blackletter ligatures

2002-11-07 Thread John H. Jenkins
res is that if the request is impossible to fulfill, it can be ignored. For discretionary ligatures like ct, this is the appropriate response. (Matters are a bit more complicated for required ligatures, of course.) == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: ct, fj and blackletter ligatures

2002-11-05 Thread John H. Jenkins
rtain strings of Unicode characters into them". TrueType fonts are perfectly capable of supporting ligatures. OpenType, AAT, and Graphite all use TrueType fonts, and all support ligatures. ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: ct, fj and blackletter ligatures

2002-11-03 Thread John H. Jenkins
ndard clearly allows both approaches. The ZWJ mechanism is not *the* Unicode approach. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Sorting on number of strokes for Traditional Chinese

2002-10-16 Thread John H. Jenkins
nt subsorts once you get beyond the stroke-count level. The five-stroke-type classification used by the PRC is a fairly recent innovation and not universally used. > Is there any online source for such data? Even for smaller sets than > Unicode > CJK. > Not that I'm aware.

Re: Sorting on number of strokes for Traditional Chinese

2002-10-15 Thread John H. Jenkins
onal Chinese characters. >> >> This is urgent, please advise. >> >> regards >> Tony >> >> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- >> (End of Report) >> >> > > == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: the carnival of lost souls

2002-10-15 Thread John H. Jenkins
Movie > Database (imdb.com) knows it not. > > -- > My corporate data's a mess! John Cowan > It's all semi-structured, no less.http://www.ccil.org/~cowan > But I'll be carefree [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Using XSLT

Re: Manchu/Mongolian in Unicode

2002-10-14 Thread John H. Jenkins
he glyphs but don't really insist that they "do the right thing." The same is true of Tibetan. Even the PRC's own fonts have this problem. This is an unfortunate bind we were put in and I hope we can correct it in a not-too-distant release. == John H. Jenkins [

Re: is this a symbol of anything? CJK?

2002-10-10 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 02:29 PM, Tex Texin wrote: > It looks close to several cjk characters, so I wasn't sure. > I think it's a variant turtle ideograph. :-) (Nothing bad, so far as I know.) ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Mac Unicode question

2002-10-01 Thread John H. Jenkins
e fonts. Carbon applications which do not explicitly use ATSUI or MLTE are limited in how much of the font they can use. Cocoa apps are pretty much able to do anything. ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: script or block detection needed for Unicode fonts

2002-09-29 Thread John H. Jenkins
data. I really don't see why an application needs to check every character as it reads in a file to make sure it can be drawn with the set font. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Keys. (derives from Re: Sequences of combining characters.)

2002-09-27 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 09:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I doubt there's anyone on this list that always agrees with me I think you're wrong, there, Peter. I *never* disagree with you. :-) ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tejat.net/

Re: Taboo Variants

2002-08-09 Thread John H. Jenkins
ricter in the future to keep it from continuing to happen. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jhjenkins/

Re: Taboo Variants

2002-08-09 Thread John H. Jenkins
t; It's got to be better than > poluting other blocks with characters that just don't belong there. > Well, nobody is strongly wedded to the current proposed allocation, to be frank. It can always change. I think the one thing people would hope is that the new character goes somewhe

Re: Digraphs as Distinct Logical Units

2002-08-09 Thread John H. Jenkins
nd there is the problem that, as you note, some taboo variants have already been encoded. It's currently scheduled to be reconsidered by the UTC. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jhjenkins/

Re: Taboo Variants (was Re: Digraphs as Distinct Logical Units )

2002-08-09 Thread John H. Jenkins
KangXi radicals block was pretty much never going to be used otherwise. Six of one, as it were. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jhjenkins/

Re: "Missing character" glyph

2002-08-02 Thread John H. Jenkins
is really meaningless. On Mac OS X, the precise appearance of such a character can have any of several dozen appearances, depending on the Unicode block in which it's found. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jhjenkins/

Re: "Missing character" glyph

2002-07-31 Thread John H. Jenkins
s all of Unicode 3.2; but the font has been entirely redesigned. We really need to update our documentation. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Tamil Text Messaging in Mobile Phones

2002-07-28 Thread John H. Jenkins
> OK, now's the time for us all to chant together, Deseret! Deseret! Shaw! Shaw! Shaw! Deseret! Deseret! Shaw! Shaw! Shaw! == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Proposal: Ligatures w/ ZWJ in OpenType

2002-07-15 Thread John H. Jenkins
solution, but it is *a* solution, and should be available to the > user without restriction or discouragement. > It's discouraged when it's inappropriate. It isn't deprecated. There are numerous places where Unicode provides multiple ways of representing something. In this in

Re: [OpenType] Proposal: Ligatures w/ ZWJ in OpenType

2002-07-07 Thread John H. Jenkins
t; feature? I'm too lazy to check right now.) We also have a list of "invisible" characters which should, ordinarily, be left undisplayed including ZWJ, ZWNJ, the bidi overrides, and so on. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: ZWJ and Latin Ligatures (was Re: (long) Re: Chromatic font research)

2002-07-07 Thread John H. Jenkins
oglobin" is incorrect. > If the source used "&c.", it should never be changed to "etc.". > So, if the source used the "ct" ligature... > > I see your point, but I think we're to the stage where we'll just have to agree to disagree. We *do

Re:_How_do_I_encode_HTML_documents_in_old_languages_=C5¿uch as 17th century Swediſh in Unicode?

2002-07-07 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Wednesday, July 3, 2002, at 11:10 AM, Stefan Persson wrote: > There is a big problem in the current Unicode ſtandard, ſince > Fraktur letters aren't ſupported in any ſuitable manner. Aargh! Medial long-s! Run away! Run away! :-) ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: The pointless thread continues

2002-07-07 Thread John H. Jenkins
l* text display on the system if it were to be used with ATSUI. It was kind of cool, actually. We actually have a "font zoo" stashed away full of pathological fonts which have been known to do all kinds of interesting things if someone should be foolish enough to install them.

Re: FW: Inappropriate Proposals FAQ

2002-07-04 Thread John H. Jenkins
corpus of writing with that script as a part of the proposal. :-) == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Inappropriate Proposals FAQ

2002-07-03 Thread John H. Jenkins
ot; in the font, and have the tables set up so that whenever "j" is found with an accent, dotlessj is substituted. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: FW: Inappropriate Proposals FAQ

2002-07-03 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Wednesday, July 3, 2002, at 11:57 AM, Asmus Freytag wrote: > Klingon (or any of the Latin ciphers/ movie scripts) > > I'd say Klingon *and* one of the Latin ciphers. Klingon is almost worth a FAQ in itself. ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL P

Re: ZWJ and Latin Ligatures

2002-07-02 Thread John H. Jenkins
ines. > The typical approach these days is for the tools that provide advanced layout table support to be keyed to glyph name. Apple's tools allow glyph name, glyph number, of Unicode code point as glyph identifiers. As you say, it makes it possible to cut-and-paste source files

Re: ZWJ and Latin Ligatures

2002-07-02 Thread John H. Jenkins
nes themselves don't need to exist, AFAIK. > True. I tend to avoid that, because if something goes wrong and the system attempts to actually *display* one of these virtual glyphs, disaster would ensue. (Dave Opstad and I have had long debates on the safety of doing this.) == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: ZWJ and Latin Ligatures

2002-07-02 Thread John H. Jenkins
rsions of our tools which are hard to use and don't let him do this. We're working on getting newer and better ones to him. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: ZWJ and Latin Ligatures

2002-07-02 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Tuesday, July 2, 2002, at 09:49 AM, Michael Everson wrote: > At 09:41 -0600 2002-07-02, John H. Jenkins wrote: > >> Alas, but that's technically impossible. Both OT and AAT (I'm not sure >> about Graphite) require that single characters map to single glyphs,

Re: ZWJ and Latin Ligatures

2002-07-02 Thread John H. Jenkins
e the ligatures with the ZWJ inserted as part of a ligature table which is on by default and which isn't revealed to the UI so that the user can't turn them off. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: ZWJ and Latin Ligatures

2002-07-01 Thread John H. Jenkins
open at the moment, you do it by turning pair kerning on and off. InDesign has a menu that lets you select degree of ligation. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: ZWJ and Latin Ligatures (was Re: (long) Re: Chromatic font research)

2002-07-01 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 02:08 PM, Asmus Freytag wrote: > At 11:34 AM 6/30/02 -0600, John H. Jenkins wrote: >> Remember, Unicode is aiming at encoding *plain text*. For the bulk of >> Latin-based languages, ligation control is simply not a matter of *plain >> text*—th

Re: Radicals in CNS 11643-1992, Plane 1, Rows 7,8,9

2002-07-01 Thread John H. Jenkins
l block (U+2Fxx). ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: ZWJ and Latin Ligatures (was Re: (long) Re: Chromatic font research)

2002-07-01 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 06:28 AM, James Kass wrote: > > John H. Jenkins wrote: > >> That seems pretty clear to me. If you want a "ct" ligature in your >> document because you think it "looks cool," then you use some >> higher-level >&

Re: ZWJ and Latin Ligatures

2002-07-01 Thread John H. Jenkins
the ligation function with ZWJ rather than creating a new character, but >> your arguments about Latin, Greek, Runic, Old Hungarian, etc. ligation >> were thorough and unassailable. > > Thank you, nice person. It's nice to know that someone else looked at the > argumen

Re: (long) Re: Chromatic font research

2002-07-01 Thread John H. Jenkins
e, the ZWJ/ZWNJ mechanism is an appropriate one to provide ligation control. 4) The precise set of ligatures in a Latin typeface is design-specific. A typeface should not be required to include a set of ligatures which do not make aesthetic sense for the overall design. This last point, by t

Re: Japanese Web pages in Unicode?

2002-06-30 Thread John H. Jenkins
> And isn't there a language used quite a bit just south of the English channel for which Latin-1 isn't really adequate? A minor, obscure language, I think. Fr-something. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: ZWJ and Latin Ligatures (was Re: (long) Re: Chromatic font research)

2002-06-30 Thread John H. Jenkins
user insert a pair around every letter they want in italics. Remember, Unicode is aiming at encoding *plain text*. For the bulk of Latin-based languages, ligation control is simply not a matter of *plain text*—that is, the message is still perfectly correct whether ligatures are on

Re: (long) Re: Chromatic font research

2002-06-29 Thread John H. Jenkins
that it was complete cocidence. It is trivial,  > fact, to disprove the hypothesis that the "experiment" supposedly proved. > > Will you guys *please* stop sending me email with the Shavian letter CHURCH everywhere the Latin letters "ct" should be? It's most

Re: (long) Re: Chromatic font research

2002-06-29 Thread John H. Jenkins
Hmm. Disregard the last message from me. It isn't "ct" you're replacing. See how annoying this all is? :-) == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: (long) Re: Chromatic font research

2002-06-29 Thread John H. Jenkins
sylistic issue and is best left to higher-level protocols. Thus saith Unicode 3.2. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Chess symbols, ZWJ, Opentype and holly type ornaments.

2002-06-20 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 03:25 PM, Kenneth Whistler wrote: > I think what a number of people on the list have been hinting -- or > openly stating -- is that prolixity is not a virtue on an email list > when trying to convey one's ideas. > IOW, brevity's wit'

Re: Hong Kong Supplementary Character Set

2002-06-11 Thread John H. Jenkins
approved way to create a conversion table from Windows 950 (with HKSCS) > to Unicode? Er, doesn't MS provide one somewhere? == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Q: How many enumerated characters in Unicode?

2002-06-05 Thread John H. Jenkins
f characters. In real life, you can ignore (2) by simply issuing a locale-specific version of a font, but there's no real way to get around (1). == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Unicode and the digital divide.

2002-05-31 Thread John H. Jenkins
ing to go. > And for the record, for slightly more you can get a low-end iMac with Mac OS X—again, a Unicode-capable OS. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Unicode and the digital divide.

2002-05-31 Thread John H. Jenkins
e that hath ears to hear, let him hear." ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Unicode and the digital divide. (derives from Re: Towards some more Private Use Area code points for ligatures.)

2002-05-31 Thread John H. Jenkins
gt; people who are on the money side of the digital divide. It's a nice goal. It isn't a realistic one, however. Now, a question on my part. You're using the term "digital divide," but you're not defining it very well. Could you tell me: a) What the "digital divide" really is from your perspective—that is, what OS is on one side and what OS on the other? b) What are the relative numbers of people with systems on both sides? If, say, your divide were to be between Mac OS 6 or earlier and Mac OS 7 or later (the point at which Apple adopted TrueType as its primary font technology), then there are likely 99.99% of all Mac users on the 7-or-later side of the divide. Do you see what I'm asking here? == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Normalisation and font technology

2002-05-29 Thread John H. Jenkins
oes not consider this an ideal long-term solution. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Normalisation and font technology

2002-05-29 Thread John H. Jenkins
; have very few fonts that are capable of doing this. > Agreement; Apple's current solution is a "better-than-nothing" one, but not really what's best in the long run IMHO. BTW, does FontLab 4 auto-generate OT layout data from the Unicode repertoire of a font? =

Re: Normalisation and font technology

2002-05-29 Thread John H. Jenkins
in perspective, however, bear in mind that it's now possible to have file names which are up to 255 UTF-16 units long (including astral characters), and that AAT data in the fonts is respected by the Finder, even for PUA characters. I can name a file in Pollard if I like, so long as an appropr

Re: N2476 a hoax?

2002-05-25 Thread John H. Jenkins
iacritical marks, > mappings between Hiragana and Katakana, mappings between European, > Arabic, and Indic digits, and so on. NOWHERE in this document is there > the slightest mention of TC/SC mappings. Isn't that a bit strange? No, not really. There is sometimes a tendency for people who work on UTC documents to have a subconscious Han/everything-else dichotomy as they work. > If > the UTC were really driving the issue of TC/SC mapping, wouldn't they > have at least given it a brief mention in a "Character Foldings" > proposal? > I would have hoped so, but evidently that didn't happen. That the UTC is concerned about SC/TC data and other Han equivalences is, in any event, already a part of the public record. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Courtyard Codes and the Private Use Area (derives from Re: Encoding of symbols and a "lock"/"unlock" pre-proposal)

2002-05-24 Thread John H. Jenkins
igatures. > > Zero width ligator was rejected. Zero-width joiner can be used to mark ligation points where they are absolutely necessary; where they are merely stylistic preferences, they belong in markup. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Bengali script - where is "khanda ta"?

2002-05-22 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, at 09:01 PM, James Kass wrote: > John H. Jenkins wrote: > >> >> I don't think that Code2000 is an OpenType font, which means it won't >> have >> the ancillary glyphs and data needed to do full proper support of many >>

Re: Bengali script - where is "khanda ta"?

2002-05-21 Thread John H. Jenkins
ngla letters but was not able to type Khanda Ta. > (The glyph is also probably missing in that font). > > I don't think that Code2000 is an OpenType font, which means it won't have the ancillary glyphs and data needed to do full proper support of many languages and scripts.

Re: Additional Deseret letters

2002-05-19 Thread John H. Jenkins
Unicode Registry? > Yes, they are. Ken Beesley of Xerox Research Center Europe is aware of their use in handwritten materials and argues that treating them as mere ligatures is insufficient. This will be WG2 document N2474. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] htt

Re: Additional Deseret letters

2002-05-19 Thread John H. Jenkins
of Unicode. > > This is news to me. They were omitted originally because they were > considered ligatures. Has there been a new paper and proposal? > Yes. WG2 documents N2473 and N2474 (when they show up, which should be shortly) deal with the issue. == John H. Jenki

Re: CJK Unified Ideographs Extension B

2002-05-13 Thread John H. Jenkins
currently eighteen characters from Extension B currently have a kDefinition entry in Unihan.txt. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Han Radical-Stroke Index

2002-05-13 Thread John H. Jenkins
e on the web > site > please? > > The current version is at <http://www.unicode.org/charts/Unihan3.2.pdf>. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: on U+7384 (was Re: Synthetic scripts (was: Re: Private Use Agreements

2002-05-11 Thread John H. Jenkins
peror five hundred years dead from an entirely different dynasty is no biggie. So the Qing dictionary, the KangXi, would have some taboo forms which would later become untaboo (especially now, of course, since nobody does that kind of thing anymore). == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: sources for plane 2 characters?

2002-05-01 Thread John H. Jenkins
> > Thanks, > > > Thomas Chan > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Greek Extended: question: missing glyphs?

2002-04-29 Thread John H. Jenkins
ning sequences. No, there's no point in asking for them. Unicode cannot add new precomposed accented Latin, Greek, or Cyrillic letters because it screw up normalization. Use the actual upsilon capital letter followed by the appropriate breathing and accent marks. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: OT: OED

2002-04-29 Thread John H. Jenkins
le on CD for Windows. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Concerning proposals

2002-04-12 Thread John H. Jenkins
inclusion in Unicode. ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: MS/Unix BOM FAQ again (small fix)

2002-04-12 Thread John H. Jenkins
matted them when we use them for Macs. A pure file on such a disk could easily be a PC file created by a Windows app or a Mac file created by a Mac app. There's no way of telling based on the media itself from which architecture the file came. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Concerning proposals

2002-04-12 Thread John H. Jenkins
e clipart pixs (B&W .GIFs, .BMPs, .JPGs, .PNGs, ...) for the additional characters you'd like to see admitted into Unicode. I believe that the proposal form specifically requires a TrueType font, although not necessarily with the initial proposal. We can't use clipart pix in the standa

Re: Character for e, 2.71828...

2002-04-07 Thread John H. Jenkins
d > 212F but none of which identified themselves as this number in particular. > > U+0065. Except in rare cases for backwards compatibility with other standards, Unicode does not include special characters for mathematical or physical constants. ====== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL

Re: who can make a detail comment about "kSpecializedSemanticVariant"

2002-04-02 Thread John H. Jenkins
ariants are characters with the same meaning but different abstract shapes. > where can I find more detail reference document about them ? The Unicode Standard, version 3.0, pp. 262-263. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Ideographic description characters?

2002-03-28 Thread John H. Jenkins
ail.yahoo.com > > > == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Talk about Unicode Myths...

2002-03-20 Thread John H. Jenkins
cal unity of the ideographs used throughout East Asia and takes the approach that they should be unified. Surrogates were introduced because it was clear that we would ultimately need more than 65536 code points to encode what people wanted to represent. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Talk about Unicode Myths...

2002-03-20 Thread John H. Jenkins
27;t really mean American (or Chinese) cultural imperialism. Unfortunately, Ohta-san can still get himself a hearing on a number of Internet-related committees. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Talk about Unicode Myths...

2002-03-20 Thread John H. Jenkins
correct algorithm is to display kanji with Japanese glyphs if at all possible. Again, the typographic tradition in Japan is to write kanji with Japanese glyphs *even* when Chinese is the language being written. == John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Re: Talk about Unicode Myths...

2002-03-20 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Wednesday, March 20, 2002, at 08:19 AM, John Cowan wrote: > I am now developing a patch for Mozilla that causes it to display all > URLs in Fraktur fonts only. > > No, no. Convert them into phonetics and write them in Deseret. ========== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMA

<    1   2   3   4   >