On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Mark Leisher wrote:
Oops. I missed a spot.
Isn't this mistake implying that you're still in favor of
'sed' over 'perl' for this kind of simple operation :-) ?
It seems to me a bit ironic that those who must be aware of all
sorts of sed/awk wizadry try to do everything
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Marco Cimarosti wrote:
Mark Leisher wrote:
Those whom can filter their mail also can alter the
subject line easily with, for example, small perl script.
% perl -ne 's/\[unicode\]// if (/^Subject:/);' messagefile
I'd really need a thing like that but,
At 11:58 +0200 2001.03.27, Michael Everson wrote:
At 18:04 +0200 2001-03-26, Marco Cimarosti wrote:
I cannot find a message by typing the first few letters of the
subject (because they are always... guess what)
Yes, this is the worst "feature" of this little experiment of
Sarasvati's. I use
At 18:04 +0200 2001-03-26, Marco Cimarosti wrote:
I cannot find a message by typing the first few letters of the
subject (because they are always... guess what)
Yes, this is the worst "feature" of this little experiment of
Sarasvati's. I use Eudora, and used to make use of this
Mark Leisher wrote:
Those whom can filter their mail also can alter the
subject line easily with, for example, small perl script.
Sean Since this is so easy, could you send me one?
% perl -ne 's/\[unicode\]// if (/^Subject:/);' messagefile
I'd really need a thing like that but,
Marco I'd really need a thing like that but, unfortunately, I don't sit
Marco in front of a powerful Linux box with Perl and all the rest.
Marco Does anyone have a solution for MS Outlook under Windows NT?
Indeed. The inability to do simple, obvious things in these programs is
Ar 23 Mar 2001, ag 1:44 scrobh Sarasvati
fn bhar "Re: Moving mail lists":
At this moment, there are 691 addresses subscribed to
the Unicode mail list. At least 24 of those entities
are points of further fan-out to local lists elsewhere.
If you can gather a list of at least 346 current
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Sean O Seaghdha wrote:
I'll take the above private response as a request for everyone opposed to or
in favour of this piece of nonsense to e-mail Sarasvati [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with your opinion. I trust Sarasvati will keep us apprised of the tally, the
proportion of
Ar 21 Mar 2001, ag 11:58 scrobh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fn bhar "[unicode] Re: Moving mail lists":
Those whom can filter their mail also can alter the subject line easily
with, for example, small perl script.
Since this is so easy, could you s
Those whom can filter their mail also can alter the subject line easily
with, for example, small perl script.
Sean Since this is so easy, could you send me one?
% perl -ne 's/\[unicode\]// if (/^Subject:/);' messagefile
Oops. I missed a spot.
% perl -ne 's/\[unicode\]// if (/^Subject:/); print;' messagefile
-
Mark Leisher Times are bad. Children no longer obey
Computing Research Labtheir parents, and
At 03:38 AM 3/22/01 +, Christopher John Fynn wrote:
But you can also filter mails based on the To: header
"To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" - every mail client I've seen that supports
filtering lets you filter based on that header.
Except if the message is a cc:...
Actually of more interest to me
Arsa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You are right, this may not be very useful for whom wish to filter
their mail, but we better keep it in mind that this may be very useful
for whom do not/can not filter their mail. Those whom can filter
their mail also can alter the subject line easily with, for
the original message has a responding address at the bottom of the msg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is this one on the list?
-Original Message-
From: John Wilcock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 March 2001 13:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists
On 22 Mar
I don't like the [unicode] prefix to all subject lines, because it eats up
too much of the valuable human readble subject line space. I could live with
it better, if it can be shortened to something like [uc], but the best
for me is dropping it at all.
And of course, there MUST NOT be any "Re:
Ar 21 Mar 2001, ag 23:06 scrobh Asmus Freytag
fn bhar "[unicode] Re: Moving mail lists":
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Actually of more interest to me is the ability *not* to filter certain mail
lists until *after* I have read them in chronologica
Please, please, please, can we not use this stupid [unicode] addition to the
subject line. I agree with all the points that have been made against it so
far. It's redundant, it wastes space and makes it harder to visually find
the message you want in a list.
Because this is such a
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Sean O Seaghdha wrote:
Please, please, please, can we not use this stupid [unicode] addition to the
subject line. I agree with all the points that have been made against it so
far. It's redundant, it wastes space and makes it harder to visually find
the message
From: Roozbeh Pournader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Sean O Seaghdha wrote:
Please, please, please, can we not use this stupid
[unicode] addition to the
subject line. I agree with all the points that have been
made against it so
far. It's redundant, it
Personally, I don't like very much the new policy of adding the label
"[unicode]" in front of message subjects, for two reasons:
1) It is the same prefix used by the list [EMAIL PROTECTED], to
which I subscribed for receiving daily digests of the Unicode List's
message. What I do is to
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Unicode subscribers:
This week Parvati and I will be moving the Unicode
mail list to a new server with new mail software.
I hope the move goes smoothly, but as you know
the best laid plans of mice and machines cough and
sputter in the
Hello Florian,
Yahoo Groups has ads by default (unless you pay a monthly fee for list
hosting), and some people do not trust the privacy policy of such
organizations.
Yes, I know. I'm subscribed to 9 YG mailing lists and manage another 4 on my own. It
is a piece of cake and there is a
I see that the list software now appends [unicode] to all subject
lines. This is very annoying, and not very useful, since those who
wish to filter their mail and put posts from this list in a folder of
its own etc. etc. can now do so by using other headers, such as
"X-list: unicode" .
Hi Christopher,
To my mind the Unicode web ftp servers mean that a separate file area just
for this mailing list would be pretty well redundant - and I suspect most
people subscribed to this list have much better things to do than to
participate in chat rooms and polls (and I can't see
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05:53 PM 3/21/01 +0100, you wrote:
I see that the list software now appends [unicode] to all subject
lines. This is very annoying, and not very useful, since those who
wish to filter their mail and put posts from this list in a folder
of its
Asmus Freytag wrote:
At 05:53 PM 3/21/01 +0100, you wrote:
I see that the list software now appends [unicode] to all subject
lines. This is very annoying, and not very useful, since those who
wish to filter their mail and put posts from this list in a folder of
its own etc. etc. can now
"Mike Lischke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just out of curiosity, why do you use an own mailing list server if
you can use a free one (Yahoo Groups)?
Yahoo Groups has ads by default (unless you pay a monthly fee for list
hosting), and some people do not trust the privacy policy of such
Sarasvati [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Unicode subscribers:
This week Parvati and I will be moving the Unicode
mail list to a new server with new mail software.
I'm sorry but you made a SEVERE configuration error: the envelope from
address of outgoing messages points back to the list
Mike Lischke wrote
Dear Sarasvati,
...
Just out of curiosity, why do you use an own mailing list server if
you can use a free one (Yahoo Groups)? The Unicode list is mirrored
there anyway, so why not make the "backup list" being the actual
list. You will get not only the list, but
29 matches
Mail list logo
