Re: What happened to Unicode CLDR's site?

2016-10-04 Thread Philippe Verdy
2016-10-04 19:25 GMT+02:00 Leonardo Boiko : > The Google error message felt a bit too harsh for a webhosting client who > merely exceeded their allotted bandwidth. It made it sound like the > website was hosting something illegal. > It's not impossible that the site was

Re: What happened to Unicode CLDR's site?

2016-10-04 Thread Leonardo Boiko
The Google error message felt a bit too harsh for a webhosting client who merely exceeded their allotted bandwidth. It made it sound like the website was hosting something illegal. 2016-10-04 13:00 GMT-03:00 Philippe Verdy : > It looks that an automated bot run by Google

Re: What happened to Unicode CLDR's site?

2016-10-04 Thread Steven R. Loomis
Depending on DNS propagation, you may see minor glitches today. But the content should all be back up. -s El [FECHA], "[NOMBRE]" <[DIRECCIÓN]> escribió: >It seems to be back up as of 16:23 UTC. > >-- >Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org

Re: What happened to Unicode CLDR's site?

2016-10-04 Thread Doug Ewell
It seems to be back up as of 16:23 UTC. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org

Re: What happened to Unicode CLDR's site?

2016-10-04 Thread Philippe Verdy
It looks that an automated bot run by Google detected an excessive use of bandwidth and launch the block, waiting for another subcription or payment, even if the site was (possibly) donated by Google itself. That bit probably does not know what it does and acts like any other hosted site.

Re: What happened to Unicode CLDR's site?

2016-10-04 Thread Steven R. Loomis
Yes, the web content is hosted by google sites, a web hosting provider. As to it being down, i understand this is being looked into. Enviado desde nuestro iPhone. > El oct. 4, 2016, a las 5:51 AM, Cristian Secară escribió: > > În data de Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:50:05 +0800,

Re: What happened to Unicode CLDR's site?

2016-10-04 Thread Marc Blanchet
On 4 Oct 2016, at 8:51, Cristian Secară wrote: > În data de Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:50:05 +0800, gfb hjjhjh a scris: > >> Why is the site suspended by Google and how to access it now? > > Just curious: Unicode = Google ? (physically) well, does not look Google to me… but see below //

Re: What happened to Unicode CLDR's site?

2016-10-04 Thread Cristian Secară
În data de Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:50:05 +0800, gfb hjjhjh a scris: > Why is the site suspended by Google and how to access it now? Just curious: Unicode = Google ? (physically) I am asking this because by entering directly http://cldr.unicode.org the error result belongs to Google and not to

Re: What happened to Unicode CLDR's site?

2016-10-04 Thread Daniel Bünzli
On Tuesday 4 October 2016 at 13:50, gfb hjjhjh wrote: > Why is the site suspended by Google and how to access it now? FWIW I reported the issue today using the website's reporting form. So I guess the answer is wait. Best, Daniel

Re: And what happened to...

2014-10-08 Thread Andrew West
On 8 October 2014 01:23, Mark E. Shoulson m...@kli.org wrote: The other thing I wanted to ask about has, sure enough, disappeared. It's the only Han character I'm following. The infamous Biang-Biang Noodle character, discussed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biangbiang_noodles The WP

And what happened to...

2014-10-07 Thread Mark E. Shoulson
The other thing I wanted to ask about has, sure enough, disappeared. It's the only Han character I'm following. The infamous Biang-Biang Noodle character, discussed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biangbiang_noodles The WP page said it was scheduled for Extension E (I

Biang,was: And what happened to...

2014-10-07 Thread Richard Cook
On Oct 7, 2014, at 5:23 PM, Mark E. Shoulson m...@kli.org wrote: The infamous Biang-Biang Noodle Mark, You seem to know as much as anyone about biang. All I can say is, biang is attested in tones 2, 4 and 1, and enshrined (along with a glyph variant) in Wenlin CDL PUA at U+E999, with 51 or

Re: What happened to...?

2014-09-22 Thread Karl Williamson
On 09/20/2014 03:32 AM, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote: I agree that we should minute at least some reason for declining. It need only be a sentence or two. I would hope that the requesters get a detailed explanation of the rejection. It would be very wrong not to do so. If so, then the minutes could

Re: What happened to...?

2014-09-20 Thread Michael Everson
On 20 Sep 2014, at 01:38, Whistler, Ken ken.whist...@sap.com wrote: Michael, Declines to take action” is pretty thin. A proposal which is declined by the UTC doesn't automatically create an obligation to write an extended dissertation explaining the rationale and putting that rationale

Re: What happened to...?

2014-09-20 Thread Mark Davis ☕️
I agree that we should minute at least some reason for declining. It need only be a sentence or two. (BTW I wasn't at that discussion.) {phone} On Sep 20, 2014 3:17 AM, Asmus Freytag asm...@ix.netcom.com wrote: On 9/19/2014 5:38 PM, Whistler, Ken wrote: Michael, Declines to take action”

Re: What happened to...?

2014-09-20 Thread Mark E. Shoulson
Thanks; I probably should have looked at later meetings too. ~mark On 09/19/2014 07:26 PM, Rick McGowan wrote: Hi Mark, This document ended up being delayed all the way into meeting #133, so the resolution is in those minutes: http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2012/12343.htm#133-A62 Regards,

Re: What happened to...?

2014-09-19 Thread Rick McGowan
Hi Mark, This document ended up being delayed all the way into meeting #133, so the resolution is in those minutes: http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2012/12343.htm#133-A62 Regards, Rick On 9/19/2014 3:56 PM, Mark E. Shoulson wrote: that,

Re: What happened to...?

2014-09-19 Thread Michael Everson
Declines to take action” is pretty thin. On 20 Sep 2014, at 00:26, Rick McGowan r...@unicode.org wrote: Hi Mark, This document ended up being delayed all the way into meeting #133, so the resolution is in those minutes: http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2012/12343.htm#133-A62 Regards,

RE: What happened to...?

2014-09-19 Thread Whistler, Ken
Michael, Declines to take action” is pretty thin. A proposal which is declined by the UTC doesn't automatically create an obligation to write an extended dissertation explaining the rationale and putting that rationale on record. It might be one thing if there were a lot of controversy

Re: What happened to...?

2014-09-19 Thread Asmus Freytag
On 9/19/2014 5:38 PM, Whistler, Ken wrote: Michael, Declines to take action” is pretty thin. A proposal which is declined by the UTC doesn't automatically create an obligation to write an extended dissertation explaining the rationale and putting that rationale on record. It might be one

RE: [OT] What happened to the OpenType list?

2001-10-01 Thread John Hudson
Dear Kamal, I thought the list had actually died. I never UNsubscribed but the posting just stopped coming. I still can't see any subscription info on the MS Typography site. Could you please send me a more specific pointer? The list was moved to a different server a few months ago, and there

Re: [OT] What happened to the OpenType list?

2001-09-26 Thread John Hudson
The OpenType list is still active, although there has not been much discussion for the past couple of weeks. See the Microsoft Typography website -- www.microsoft.com/typography -- for subscription information. John Hudson Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com Vancouver, BC [EMAIL

[OT] What happened to the OpenType list?

2001-09-24 Thread Charlie Jolly