James,
you might want to review (at least) the OFL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIL_Open_Font_License, a license specifically
created for fonts, created with freedoms in mind. In several respects it
fits fonts much better than GPLv3.
/Sz
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 18:12, James Kass
Sorry, I was reading my mail threads according to time/date. I see now
that the same has been proposed on the other thread. I also see you
preferring not to act due to private commitments and time constrains.
Sorry, again, for bringing this up unnecessarily.
All the best for your struggle, and
Open Font License added already to https://sourceforge.net/projects/code2000/
page. So Code2nnn is now dual-licensed.
James Kass
--- On Sat, 2/4/12, Szelp, A. Sz. a.sz.sz...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Szelp, A. Sz. a.sz.sz...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack
As a side effect of correspondence with Thierry Thomas and Paul Wise I provide
evidence of third party non-trustable Wikipedia rumouring abuse against myself
and others to avoid any misunderstanding.
James Kass
PS:
Evidence for following facts:
1 - instead of doing paid research, Lukas Pietsch
Sorry I don't understand, what is this in aid of?
Sent from my Android phone
On Feb 4, 2012 5:52 PM, James Kass jamesk...@att.net wrote:
As a side effect of correspondence with Thierry Thomas and Paul Wise I
provide evidence of third party non-trustable Wikipedia rumouring abuse
against
Sadly, I am insulted, nazified and reviled by this german Lukas Pietsch, see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Code2000 And the same happens to your fellow
Indians from the same Lukas Pietsch hands:
Of course I put these three Code2nnn fonts on SourceForge, being sick of their
further development and whole commercial aura around them. All fonts are now of
course freeware - simply do what you want with them all. Check:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/code2000/ project, it contains link to
On Friday, February 03, 2012 9:52:26 AM James Kass wrote:
All fonts are now of course freeware - simply do what you want with them
all.
Freeware isn't afaik a legal term.
Could you slap some kind of license on them?
The CC0 or MIT licenses sound like what you might want:
License already included in SourceForge download, namely GPLv3.
James Kass
--- On Fri, 2/3/12, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
From: Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org
Subject: Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of Complex
script rendering support on Android)
To: unicode@unicode.org
Cc:
GPL != do what you want with them :) For example what Christoph pointed out.
You may want to consider a more permissive license if do what you want is
your intent.
-Shawn
(as myself)
From: unicode-bou...@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bou...@unicode.org] On Behalf
Of James Kass
Sent: Friday,
I rather would stick with GPLv3, simply because more permissive license
threatens freedom. For example, someone may take over my fonts, develop them
further, and subsequently change their license to something commercial-only. It
is what I want to avoid. Just something like stories known from
FWIW there are many other free hosting services than SourceForge...
Sent from my Android phone
On Feb 3, 2012 10:44 PM, Shawn Steele shawn.ste...@microsoft.com wrote:
GPL != “do what you want with them” J For example what Christoph
pointed out. You may want to consider a more permissive
James Kass wrote:
Of course I put these three Code2nnn fonts on SourceForge, being sick of
their further development and whole commercial aura around them.
Thanks for your work contributing to Unicode and to the whole community.
Antoine
I'm very happy that I could contribute my work to Unicode and to the whole
community.
James Kass
--- On Fri, 2/3/12, Antoine Leca antoine10...@leca-marti.org wrote:
From: Antoine Leca antoine10...@leca-marti.org
Subject: Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of Complex
script
Code2000 is everywhere. Absolutely everywhere. Many people continue to
consider it one of the pre-eminent fonts available with the goal of covering as
much of Unicode as possible.
Even though I now have a Windows 7 machine, with its greatly enhanced (over XP)
font collection, there are still
We don't know exactly the reasons why James has closed his website or
even his support for this font. But if he really was alone he probably
did not havethe money to support the site, or the bandwidth used for
it (may be he's now in financial troubles, like loss of his job in
this hard times). Or
On 7 November 2011 08:34, a...@peoplestring.com wrote:
Code2000 supports most BMP code points of Unicode 5.2. It is open sourced
from September:
http://code2000.sourceforge.net/
I have doubts as to whether this project was actually created by James
Kass. The project comprises the last
17 matches
Mail list logo
