On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 22:00:18 +1100
Harshula via Unicode wrote:
> When a font is missing a glyph during an *explicit* conjunct lookup,
> it appears the most accurate solution is to display the missing glyph
> symbol.
However, I don't believe that that is the most useful solution, and it
Hi Richard,
On 16/10/18 2:29 pm, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:59:54 +1100
> Harshula via Unicode wrote:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> On 16/10/18 6:57 am, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
>>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:47:36 +1100
>>> Harshula via Unicode wrote:
>>>
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:59:54 +1100
Harshula via Unicode wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 16/10/18 6:57 am, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:47:36 +1100
> > Harshula via Unicode wrote:
> >
> >> Note, touching letters are formed by , so they
> >> should not be
Hi Richard,
On 16/10/18 6:57 am, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:47:36 +1100
> Harshula via Unicode wrote:
>
>> Note, touching letters are formed by , so they should
>> not be displayed as a fallback for conjuncts.
>
> I don't follow that. While the conjuncts
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:47:36 +1100
Harshula via Unicode wrote:
> Note, touching letters are formed by , so they should
> not be displayed as a fallback for conjuncts.
I don't follow that. While the conjuncts with r-, -r and -y are very
different to pairs of touching letters, the conjuncts for
Hi Richard,
On 15/10/18 6:53 pm, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 01:55:24 +1100
> Harshula via Unicode wrote:
>
>> 3) However, what you have observed is an issue with *explicit*
>> conjunct creation. After the segmentation is completed, the
>> layout/shaping engine
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 01:55:24 +1100
Harshula via Unicode wrote:
> 3) However, what you have observed is an issue with *explicit*
> conjunct creation. After the segmentation is completed, the
> layout/shaping engine needs to first check if there is a
> corresponding lookup for the explicit
Sinhala consonant clusters? There are
> fallback rules for Devanagari, but I'm not sure if they read across.
>
> The problem I am seeing is that the Pali syllable 'ndhe' න්ධෙ NAYANNA, U+0DCA AL-LAKUNA, 200D ZWJ, U+0DB0 MAHAPRAANA DAYANNA, U+0DD9
> KOMBUVA> is being rendered identic
On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:15:26 +0900
"Martin J. Dürst via Unicode" wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> On 2018/10/14 09:02, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> > Are there fallback rules for Sinhala consonant clusters? There are
> > fallback rules for Devanagari, but I
Hello Richard,
On 2018/10/14 09:02, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
Are there fallback rules for Sinhala consonant clusters? There are
fallback rules for Devanagari, but I'm not sure if they read across.
The problem I am seeing is that the Pali syllable 'ndhe' න්ධෙ
Let's label
Are there fallback rules for Sinhala consonant clusters? There are
fallback rules for Devanagari, but I'm not sure if they read across.
The problem I am seeing is that the Pali syllable 'ndhe' න්ධෙ is being rendered identically to a hypothetical Sinhalese
'nēdha' නේධ , which in NFD is
, when
11 matches
Mail list logo
