Leonardo Boiko :
>
> All of the current face expression emoji are to be decomposed as FACE plus
> abstract combining characters; for example, U+1F642 SLIGHTLY SMILING FACE
> will be considered a compatibility variant of FACE + COMBINING SMILE +
> COMBINING SLIGHT FACIAL EXPRESSION
This is actu
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Leonardo Boiko
wrote:
> We obviously need an emoji for every species name listed within The
> Official Registry of Zoological Nomenclature.
>
> I propose a new set of Basic Latin characters, the Zoological Nomenclature
> Indicator Symbols, to be used for spelling
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Michael Everson
wrote:
>
> > On 29 Aug 2016, at 20:33, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
> >
> > There have been dinosaur proposals; the emoji subcommittee is still
> looking at the priorities among animals.
>
> Andrew West’s dinosaur proposal was spot-on in its scope and pre
> On 29 Aug 2016, at 20:33, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
>
> There have been dinosaur proposals; the emoji subcommittee is still looking
> at the priorities among animals.
Andrew West’s dinosaur proposal was spot-on in its scope and prediction for
popularity and usage. Having only one dinosaur emoji
Leonardo Boiko wrote:
|We obviously need an emoji for every species name listed within The \
|Official Registry of Zoological Nomenclature.
Ride it out. Ride it out.
Oh, it shouldn't take that much longer if we all go for it.
--steffen
16 at 12:08 PM, Karl Williamson > wrote:
>
>> "I'm excited about the proposal to add a brontosaurus emoji codepoint
>> because it has the potential to bring together a half-dozen different
>> groups of pedantic people together"
>>
>> From http://xkcd.com/1726/
>>
>> I don't know if this is new, or I just never saw it before.
>>
>>
>
ent.
>
> Leo
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Karl Williamson > wrote:
>
>> "I'm excited about the proposal to add a brontosaurus emoji codepoint
>> because it has the potential to bring together a half-dozen different
>> groups of pedantic people tog
I mean the comic is the newest.
There have been dinosaur proposals; the emoji subcommittee is still looking
at the priorities among animals.
Mark
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Karl Williamson
> wrote:
>
>> http://xkcd.com/1726/
>
>
It's new. Let's not tell Randall about the "completing the set" argument.
Leo
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Karl Williamson
wrote:
> "I'm excited about the proposal to add a brontosaurus emoji codepoint
> because it has the potential to bring togethe
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Karl Williamson
wrote:
> http://xkcd.com/1726/
That's the newest one
Mark
"I'm excited about the proposal to add a brontosaurus emoji codepoint
because it has the potential to bring together a half-dozen different
groups of pedantic people together"
From http://xkcd.com/1726/
I don't know if this is new, or I just never saw it before.
11 matches
Mail list logo