: Michael (michka)
Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 07,
2001 9:51 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Unicode
ListSubject: Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion
May be a stupid question, but have you actually
*tried* to convert anything using the code page values I gave? I'd rather
Title: Message
Right, there is a section of intl.inf allows you to install optional code
pages and that populates the list you see under Advanced Regional Options.
Through an oversight, c_iscii.dll isn't in that section
in Windows 2000--it's installed if and only if you install the
John:
In Windows 2000, you could not install the ISCII code page as an optional code
page--only by installing the Indic language group.
Strange. I have it (and all lg groups) installed, and the c_iscii.dll file is in my system32 folder, but the codepages mentioned don't show up in my Advanced
Hi,
Would anybody be able to point me to possible ISCII-Unicode conversion utilities/APIs?
How reliable is the conversion?
How well is Hindi supported by the UTF8-Internet Explorer combination?
Your expertise is GREATLY appreciated.
Best,
Etienne
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, John H. Jenkins wrote:
On Tuesday, November 6, 2001, at 09:41 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
John Jenkins said:
Ah, but you should never underestimate the power of the Force. Remember
that the IRG is *already* looking to adding some 60,000 ideographs for
Extension
Below is Ken Whistler's historical table of codespace counts, extracted from
the message Is 879,309 enough? and slightly refurbished, followed by the
Unicode 3.2 codespace allocation map (cf. http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps ).
Your terminology may differ, but here's what's used below:
BMP
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Arjun Aggarwal wrote:
Hello everybody
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Philipp Reichmuth wrote
I've been wondering a little bit recently about the definition of
character vs. glyph variant that is applied during decision
whether or not a given proposed character should go into
Marco Cimarosti writes:
Tom Emerson wrote:
One gotcha, that I run into every six months or so, is forgetting that
the punctuation characters in the Basic Latin block are classified as
Latin script. This trips me up because most of my text processing work
involves CJK, so I'll write
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 11:17:50AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2001-11-08 7:19:19 Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any freely available info on ISO 9995, or do I have to pay through the
nose for the privilege of learning about it?
I have a litte
9 matches
Mail list logo
