Lisa Moore li...@us.ibm.com wrote:
|Steffen,
|
|Actually, it is point of fact. The Unicode Consortium was incorporated in
|1991 as a not for profit 501 c (6). In 2012, the US and State tax
|bodies approved our becoming a not for profit 501 c (3). That change
|means that donations to
I seems this post is a bit inappropriate for this forum in its content
and given its rather bizarre immaturity of interaction with other
member, seems altogether more fitting for a kindergarten playground in .
It would be nice if such posts could be kept off this list.
A./
On 9/17/2013 8:15
Is the Unicode Consortium allowed to receive dedicated grants like a public
foundation under US law ?
And if so, how does this conform with the UTC working policies ? I suppose
that the Henry Luce Foundation (HLF) will monitor the progresses (to
provide payments) but will it influence the agenda
|status changed to become a non-profit charity foundation dedicated to
|wordlwide promotion of education and culture. Thanks.
Oh -- that would be adorable!
--steffen
---BeginMessage---
Is the Unicode Consortium allowed to receive dedicated grants like a public
foundation under US law ?
And if
Sorry to say but a lot of nonsense in your message.
For status of the Unicode Consortium please refer to
http://www.unicode.org/consortium/consort.html
Unicode has always been a member based nonprofit organization and was always
welcoming grants of any sort to help its work. Many experts and
Please stop, I've enough replies about the Unicode Consortium status.
But my questions about consequences of **dedicated** grants remain as it
affects how you'll organize works and manage it, within a limited
timeframe. We've not seen this discussed before and nothing is found on the
website
On 9/16/2013 2:05 PM, Steffen Daode Nurpmeso wrote:
But this may be a sign that the Unicode Consortium is about to have
its own status changed to become a non-profit charity foundation
dedicated to wordlwide promotion of education and culture. Thanks. But
this should be clear, and some
Again look at the encoding proposals. For example, many have been sponsored by
SEI. Funds were disbursed to experts doing the ground work. They are all
dedicated by definition. Of course it is easier to get traction for an
encoding proposals when there have been some source of funding. What is
On 9/16/2013 3:01 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
Please stop, I've enough replies about the Unicode Consortium status.
But my questions about consequences of **dedicated** grants remain as
it affects how you'll organize works and manage it, within a limited
timeframe. We've not seen this discussed
Hey, Michel, let me correct the history here. The Unicode Consortium was
originally incorporated as a 501 c (6) not-for-profit. In 2012, we
converted to a 501 c (3) not-for-profit. The conversion was approved in
2013, but the IRS counted the date of filing as the conversion date. The
10 matches
Mail list logo
