Re: Ill-formed sequences (was: Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8)

2003-11-05 Thread Doug Ewell
Addison Phillips [wM] wrote: >> I assume that by âmultiple UTF-8 sequences that could represent the >> same logical text,â Adobe is referring to non-shortest UTF-8 >> sequences such as and not to Unicode canonical equivalences >> or something else. No similar warning about âmultiple sequencesâ

RE: Ill-formed sequences (was: Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8)

2003-11-05 Thread Addison Phillips [wM]
> > I assume that by âmultiple UTF-8 sequences that could represent the same > logical text,â Adobe is referring to non-shortest UTF-8 sequences such > as and not to Unicode canonical equivalences or something else. > No similar warning about âmultiple sequencesâ is given in the sections > that d