Addison Phillips [wM] <aphillips at webmethods dot com> wrote: >> I assume that by âmultiple UTF-8 sequences that could represent the >> same logical text,â Adobe is referring to non-shortest UTF-8 >> sequences such as <C0 80> and not to Unicode canonical equivalences >> or something else. No similar warning about âmultiple sequencesâ is >> given in the sections that deal with UTF-16. > > I am under the impression that they mean combining sequences.
That would be good, but then I wonder why they phrased the issue in terms of UTF-8 rather than Unicode generally. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
