RE: Standardised Encoding of Text

: Unicode Public Subject: Re: Standardised Encoding of Text On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 17:10:01 +0200 Mark Davis wrote: > While it would be good to document more scripts, and more language > options per script, that is always subject to getting experts signed > up to develop them. > > What

Re: Standardised Encoding of Text

On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 21:14:38 +0200 Mark Davis ☕️ wrote: > Mark > > *— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —* > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Richard Wordingham < > richard.wording...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 17:10:01 +0200 > > Mark Davis ☕️ w

Re: Standardised Encoding of Text

Mark *— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —* On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Richard Wordingham < richard.wording...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 17:10:01 +0200 > Mark Davis ☕️ wrote: > > > While it would be good to document more scripts, and more langu

Re: Standardised Encoding of Text

On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 17:10:01 +0200 Mark Davis wrote: > While it would be good to document more scripts, and more language > options per script, that is always subject to getting experts signed > up to develop them. > > What I'd really like to see instead of documentation is a data-based > approac

Re: Standardised Encoding of Text

On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 17:10:01 +0200 Mark Davis ☕️ wrote: > While it would be good to document more scripts, and more language > options per script, that is always subject to getting experts signed > up to develop them. > > What I'd really like to see instead of documentation is a data-based > appr

Re: Standardised Encoding of Text

While it would be good to document more scripts, and more language options per script, that is always subject to getting experts signed up to develop them. What I'd really like to see instead of documentation is a data-based approach. For example, perhaps the addition of real data to CLDR for a "

Re: Standardised Encoding of Text

On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 14:46:31 +0300 "Erkki I Kolehmainen" wrote: > Sorry, but I find myself having a serious problem in understanding > what this is about. In some cases the TUS lays down in detail the order of characters and their interpretation. While Europeans have canonical combining classes

RE: Standardised Encoding of Text

Sorry, but I find myself having a serious problem in understanding what this is about. Sincerely, Erkki I. Kolehmainen Tilkankatu 12 A 3, 00300 Helsinki, Finland Mob: +358400825943, Tel: +358943682643, Fax: +35813318116 -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@uni