2016-10-04 19:25 GMT+02:00 Leonardo Boiko :
> The Google error message felt a bit too harsh for a webhosting client who
> merely exceeded their allotted bandwidth. It made it sound like the
> website was hosting something illegal.
>
It's not impossible that the site was hacked a bit somewhere an
The Google error message felt a bit too harsh for a webhosting client who
merely exceeded their allotted bandwidth. It made it sound like the
website was hosting something illegal.
2016-10-04 13:00 GMT-03:00 Philippe Verdy :
> It looks that an automated bot run by Google detected an excessive us
Depending on DNS propagation, you may see minor glitches today. But the content
should all be back up.
-s
El [FECHA], "[NOMBRE]" <[DIRECCIÓN]> escribió:
>It seems to be back up as of 16:23 UTC.
>
>--
>Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
It seems to be back up as of 16:23 UTC.
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
It looks that an automated bot run by Google detected an excessive use of
bandwidth and launch the block, waiting for another subcription or payment,
even if the site was (possibly) donated by Google itself. That bit probably
does not know what it does and acts like any other hosted site. (Google's
Yes, the web content is hosted by google sites, a web hosting provider.
As to it being down, i understand this is being looked into.
Enviado desde nuestro iPhone.
> El oct. 4, 2016, a las 5:51 AM, Cristian Secară escribió:
>
> În data de Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:50:05 +0800, gfb hjjhjh a scris:
>
On 4 Oct 2016, at 8:51, Cristian Secară wrote:
> În data de Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:50:05 +0800, gfb hjjhjh a scris:
>
>> Why is the site suspended by Google and how to access it now?
>
> Just curious: Unicode = Google ? (physically)
well, does not look Google to me… but see below
//
di
În data de Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:50:05 +0800, gfb hjjhjh a scris:
> Why is the site suspended by Google and how to access it now?
Just curious: Unicode = Google ? (physically)
I am asking this because by entering directly http://cldr.unicode.org
the error result belongs to Google and not to unicode
On Tuesday 4 October 2016 at 13:50, gfb hjjhjh wrote:
> Why is the site suspended by Google and how to access it now?
FWIW I reported the issue today using the website's reporting form. So I guess
the answer is wait.
Best,
Daniel
On 09/20/2014 03:32 AM, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
I agree that we should minute at least some reason for declining. It
need only be a sentence or two.
I would hope that the requesters get a detailed explanation of the
rejection. It would be very wrong not to do so. If so, then the
minutes could
Thanks; I probably should have looked at later meetings too.
~mark
On 09/19/2014 07:26 PM, Rick McGowan wrote:
Hi Mark,
This document ended up being delayed all the way into meeting #133, so
the resolution is in those minutes:
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2012/12343.htm#133-A62
Regards,
I agree that we should minute at least some reason for declining. It need
only be a sentence or two.
(BTW I wasn't at that discussion.)
{phone}
On Sep 20, 2014 3:17 AM, "Asmus Freytag" wrote:
> On 9/19/2014 5:38 PM, Whistler, Ken wrote:
>
>> Michael,
>>
>> "Declines to take action” is pretty t
On 20 Sep 2014, at 01:38, Whistler, Ken wrote:
> Michael,
>
>> "Declines to take action” is pretty thin.
>
> A proposal which is declined by the UTC doesn't automatically create an
> obligation to write an extended dissertation explaining the rationale and
> putting that rationale on record.
On 9/19/2014 5:38 PM, Whistler, Ken wrote:
Michael,
"Declines to take action” is pretty thin.
A proposal which is declined by the UTC doesn't automatically
create an obligation to write an extended dissertation explaining
the rationale and putting that rationale on record. It might be
one thin
Michael,
> "Declines to take action” is pretty thin.
A proposal which is declined by the UTC doesn't automatically
create an obligation to write an extended dissertation explaining
the rationale and putting that rationale on record. It might be
one thing if there were a lot of controversy involve
"Declines to take action” is pretty thin.
On 20 Sep 2014, at 00:26, Rick McGowan wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> This document ended up being delayed all the way into meeting #133, so the
> resolution is in those minutes:
>
> http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2012/12343.htm#133-A62
>
> Regards,
>Rick
>
Hi Mark,
This document ended up being delayed all the way into meeting #133, so
the resolution is in those minutes:
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2012/12343.htm#133-A62
Regards,
Rick
On 9/19/2014 3:56 PM, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
that, http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2011/11373-linguistic-doubt.
17 matches
Mail list logo
