> One application at present would be so that fine quality type set
> illustrations of music and mathematics could be produced by placing
> that sequence of codes in the param statement of a java applet in a
> web page.
You may have a look at Lilypond, which is a free musical typesetting
engine
Edward Cherlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suggest, therefore, that writing a downloadable TeX DVI renderer
> plug-in for a Web browser is a more general long-term solution for
> your application. Most of the code you would need is available as open
> source in C. It would not surprise me if
At 3:52 AM -0800 2/22/01, William Overington wrote:
>Having been advised recently about accessing 21 bit unicode characters using
>an example from musical notation, following up on that advice I have found
>the document that details characters in the range U+1d100 to U+1d1ff,
>entitled Musical Sym
oofs.
>
>Don
>//
>
>-Original Message-
>From: William Overington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:53 AM
>To: Unicode List
>Subject: Re: What about musical notation?
>
>
>-
>-
>Does anyone know of any details o
At 04:44 AM 2/22/01, Lukas Pietsch wrote:
>As far as I know, music printing with mobile letters of this kind was
>indeed done, mostly back in the 16th/17th century. There were "letters"
>which each represented one fragment of a stave with one or several
>noteheads on them. It tended to look pretty
William Overington asked:
> While on the subject of specialist settings, could someone say how one
> expresses a mathematical formula using unicode please, or is it, as it
> appears music is at present, beyond the scope of what unicode can presently
> achieve?
This will soon be the topic of a Un
In a (private) message dated 2001-02-22 08:47:26 Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Wagner score (or folk tune) is a matter of three-dimensional
> > layout, which is outside the scope of Unicode.
>
> You probably meant *bi*-dimensional layout, right?
Of course I did. Duh
Message-
From: William Overington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:53 AM
To: Unicode List
Subject: Re: What about musical notation?
-
-
Does anyone know of any details of metal music type please?
William Overington
22 February 2001
At 07:58 -0800 2001-02-22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Unicode only provides the symbols -- the building blocks -- needed to set
>music. The process of taking these building blocks and creating a full
>Wagner score (or folk tune) is a matter of three-dimensional layout, which is
>outside the scope
In a message dated 2001-02-22 04:30:20 Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> So, I am left wondering as to how unicode will be used to set music.
Unicode only provides the symbols -- the building blocks -- needed to set
music. The process of taking these building blocks and creat
At 03:52 AM 2/22/2001 -0800, William Overington wrote:
>Am I right in thinking that in the days when hand set metal type on printing
>presses was the only method of printing that there were fonts of musical
>type? I have never seen any font of such type myself, though I have seen
>fonts for such
>
> Am I right in thinking that in the days when hand set metal type on
printing
> presses was the only method of printing that there were fonts of musical
> type? I have never seen any font of such type myself, though I have seen
> fonts for such non-text matters as chess sets and crossword puz
Having been advised recently about accessing 21 bit unicode characters using
an example from musical notation, following up on that advice I have found
the document that details characters in the range U+1d100 to U+1d1ff,
entitled Musical Symbols.
I began wondering about how one would use unicode
> ...
> ***
> * ENGLISH VERSION *
> ***
> I read the code approved (but not released yet), but exists a deficiency
> (from my point of view) and giving to Perry Roland all my admiration for
> the excellent work:
> -Talking strictly about the notes; the convention ap
Am 2001-01-24 um 7:37 h UCT hat David Starner geschrieben:
> Unicode is not a rich text format, nor a format for storing music. The
> symbols being encoded are for discussion in text, not for music storage.
And as primitives for a (forthcoming?) format to store music scores:
"higher-level protoco
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:20:21PM -0800, Erik Garr?s wrote:
> Why the improvement?: To be able to store music (not symbols) in a condensed
> format into electronic media, so the players will "talk" what is written in
> "muscial language" (like some software do speaking phrases in some
> langua
Text on spanish and english
Texto en español e inglés
**
* VERSIÓN EN ESPAÑOL *
**
Leí el código aprovado (pero aún no liberado), pero existe una deficiencia
(a mi parecer) y sin menospreciar el excelente trabajo de Perry Roland:
-Hablando específicamente
>I think Mr. Garres means the western musical notation invented in the
1200s,
>which is very widely, if not universally, used today.
As has been mentioned, Western Musical Symbols have been approved for
Unicode 3.1 (= ISO/IEC 10646-2), to be published later this year. Details
can be found in pro
Hello,
I think Mr. Garres means the western musical notation invented in the 1200s, which is
very widely, if not universally, used today.
Unicode 3.0 actually already has at least 2 older forms of musical notation in the
main Hebrew block and somewhere in the Arabic block---they are signs for
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Erik Garrés wrote:
> First of all, excuse my English.
> I would like to know, why the symbols used for music are not listed on
> UNICODE ? Because music is the world-wide manner of communication and
> expression.
>
> Does anybody agree ? I would like to know what you think
First of all, excuse my English.
I would like to know, why the symbols used for music are not listed on
UNICODE ? Because music is the world-wide manner of communication and
expression.
Does anybody agree ? I would like to know what you think !
Erik
21 matches
Mail list logo
