Re: UTF-8 encoded texts on the website (was Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes)

2004-05-21 Thread jcowan
Philippe Verdy scripsit: > But today the global httd.conf does not specify any charset in the content-type, In fact I have seen the current httpd.conf, and it does specify UTF-8 as the DefaultCharset. -- "While staying with the Asonu, I met a man from John Cowan the Candensian plane, which

Re: Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes

2004-05-21 Thread Kenneth Whistler
Doug asked: > I'm sure this is a dumb question, but why would there be any pages in > non-Unicode charsets on the Unicode Web site? Legacy, just as for many sites. The question is whether it makes sense to go back to older, archived material and: a. delete it, because it is in Latin-1 or CP 1

Re: UTF-8 encoded texts on the website (was Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes)

2004-05-21 Thread jcowan
Philippe Verdy scripsit: > You can instruct Apache to serve a part of the site with another default > encoding by uploading with your FTP client a .htaccess file containing a > different default MIME type association. .htaccess cannot do anything that hacking the httpd.conf file can't do. In this

Re: UTF-8 encoded texts on the website (was Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes)

2004-05-21 Thread Philippe Verdy
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Jon Hanna scripsit: > > > [T]he default encoding on the server (which really should be utf-8 > > on www.unicode.org at this stage). > > Currently it is, but there are sticky issues: in particular, a default encoding > overrides information in HTML meta elements as well a

Re: Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes

2004-05-21 Thread jcowan
Doug Ewell scripsit: > John Cowan wrote: > > > Consequently, random pages that happen to be in non-Unicode charsets > > are getting mis-served and mis-displayed. The site will probably > > revert to having no default as a result, which is a great pity. > > I'm sure this is a dumb question, but

Re: Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes

2004-05-21 Thread Doug Ewell
John Cowan wrote: > Consequently, random pages that happen to be in non-Unicode charsets > are getting mis-served and mis-displayed. The site will probably > revert to having no default as a result, which is a great pity. I'm sure this is a dumb question, but why would there be any pages in non

Re: Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes

2004-05-21 Thread jcowan
Jon Hanna scripsit: > This is passing strange, for the problem was UTF-8 being mis-interpreted as a > legacy encoding, not the other way around. a) Not everyone uses a modern browser. 2) The problem might have been speculative (or memorious) rather than actual. -- John Cowan

Re: Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes

2004-05-21 Thread Jon Hanna
Quoting "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jon Hanna scripsit: > > > [T]he default encoding on the server (which really should be utf-8 > > on www.unicode.org at this stage). > > Currently it is, but there are sticky issues: in particular, a default > encoding > overrides information in

Re: Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes

2004-05-21 Thread jcowan
Jon Hanna scripsit: > [T]he default encoding on the server (which really should be utf-8 > on www.unicode.org at this stage). Currently it is, but there are sticky issues: in particular, a default encoding overrides information in HTML meta elements as well as browser heuristics, at least for mod

Re: Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes

2004-05-21 Thread Jon Hanna
Quoting Michael Everson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 15:39 +0100 2004-05-21, Jon Hanna wrote: > > >Were the headers correct? > > It is plain text. HTTP has headers separate to the content (the headers come first and the content comes next). These headers can contain encoding information and other

Re: Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes

2004-05-21 Thread Michael Everson
At 15:39 +0100 2004-05-21, Jon Hanna wrote: Were the headers correct? It is plain text. -- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com

Zip vs. Non Zipped and ISO 15924 draft fixes

2004-05-21 Thread Jon Hanna
> >As a side note to Michael or the other 6 RA members (Ken, and Rick notably), > I > >don't think it's even a good idea to ZIP this reference plain-text file due > to > >its very small size (which smaller than each of the HTML versions of > >codelists). > [snip] > Everyone has a zip tool. > >