Thanks for the link. It is good to know that MSKLC can be used for creating
Keyboard Driver for WinCE. But is it true only truetype fonts can be used. No
OTF?
Thanks and refgares
Mustafa Jabbar
Quoting Christopher John Fynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Suggest you check the Global Development pages
Arcane Jill wrote:
PLEASE don't quote me out of context, Doug. You can't quote This
being so without also quoting what the This predicate was upon
which the conclusions were based. As it happens, it was subsequently
pointed out to me that the This predicate was, in fact, NOT so,
therefore it
Thanks for the link. It is good to know that MSKLC can be used for creating
Keyboard Driver for WinCE. But is it true only truetype fonts can be used. No
OTF?
Thanks and refgares
Mustafa Jabbar
I doubt that PostScript flavour OpenType fonts can be used since that would
require some form of
-Original Message-
From: Michael Everson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pronounced as you mean it here refers to the
reading rules, not the structure of the script.
That seems to me to be saying we should be encoding the structure of the
script (a statement I'd agree with in general).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Patrick Andries
Is there any plan for Microsoft to support Unicode 4.0, distribute
with
its
operating system the corresponding fonts and update the corresponding
Character Map tools/charts (Office
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Michael Everson
I think the TDIL chart is wrong.
It seems reasonable that one should need extra persuasion to take the
word of an American living in Ireland over Indians. (Sorry.)
Traditionally (as
At 12:32 -0800 2003-11-29, Peter Constable wrote:
Pronounced as you mean it here refers to the
reading rules, not the structure of the script.
That seems to me to be saying we should be encoding the structure of the
script (a statement I'd agree with in general).
Sure.
It can't be a NNTA
I noticed the following on the Technical Work page on the Unicode Web
site, at http://www.unicode.org/techwork.html:
The Unicode Standard was the basis for the Universal Character Set,
two-octet form (UCS-2) of ISO/IEC 10646. The Unicode Standards 65,536
code values are the first 65,536 code
Someone, I forgot who, questioned whether converting Unicode text to NFC
would actually improve its compressibility, and asked if any actual data
was available.
Certainly there is no guarantee that normalization would *always* result
in a smaller file. A compressor that took advantage of
At 13:17 -0800 2003-11-29, Peter Constable wrote:
I think the TDIL chart is wrong.
It seems reasonable that one should need extra persuasion to take
the word of an American living in Ireland over Indians. (Sorry.)
Peter, I would take those TDIL publications with a very large grain
of salt.
I also sincrely doubt that MSKLC will create keyboards that will work on a
CE device, to tell you the truth. Maybe they do, but they have never been
tested there and I would be surprised if they had no problems (never forget
the First Tester's Axiom!).
MichKa [MS]
NLS Collation/Locale/Keyboard
Michael Everson writes:
Peter Constable wrote:
I think the TDIL chart is wrong.
It seems reasonable that one should need extra persuasion to take
the word of an American living in Ireland over Indians. (Sorry.)
Isn't there a specific list for Brahmic scripts? ([EMAIL PROTECTED] ???).
Philippe Verdy verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
I've tried to experiment a collation algorithm to implement UCA by the
same system as used in UCD decompositions, but with added (and
sometimes modified) decompositions. This system creates new code
points needed to represent only
Philippe Verdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also think that Tibetan issues should be discussed in that list, despite
its composition model is very different from Brahmic scripts of India,
unless there's a specific rapporteur group for it.
There already is a specific list for Tibetan script
14 matches
Mail list logo
