They are actually allowed on combining marks of ccc=0. We even define one
such variation sequence for Myanmar, IIRC.
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020, 2:12 PM Richard Wordingham via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> Why are variation selectors not allowed for combining marks? I can see
> a reason for
You don't need an ISO 15924 script code. You need to think in terms of BCP
47. Sanskrit in Latin would be sa-Latn. Now, if you want to distinguish the
different transcription systems for writing Sanskrit in Latin, you can
apply to registry a BCP 47 variant. There are also BCP 47 extension T,
which
Jonathan,
I've been trying to gather a list of the Arabic marks that actually happen
in Hebrew for a while now, but don't have sources. I want to add them to
ScriptExtensions data in Unicode. Do you know of a source that lists them?
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Jonathan Rosenne via Unicode
3 matches
Mail list logo
