Re: Looking for transcription or transliteration standards latin- arabic

2004-07-09 Thread Ted Hopp
to use only the limited set of characters implemented, to the world of Unicode which removes this constraint, transliteration is no longer needed or useful. Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http

Re: is n with tilde used in French language ?

2004-07-05 Thread Ted Hopp
the pronunciation of the o), while ñ is a different letter from n. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Pointers to another discussion of the Phoenician proposal

2004-06-03 Thread Ted Hopp
Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?

2004-06-02 Thread Ted Hopp
of sense, as do Peter Kirk's rebuttals of 5/27. And this is the first (and possibly last) sentence I've written that uses the word fraktur. :-) Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Proposal to encode dominoes and other game symbols

2004-06-01 Thread Ted Hopp
are not alphabetic, ideographic, or symbolic; they are not linguistic. They are pictorial. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?

2004-06-01 Thread Ted Hopp
? (There may have been paleographers in the first century BC as there are today. That shouldn't be construed as unqualified contemporaneous use.) This might be relevant: http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=1308letter=A Ted Hopp Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990

Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?

2004-05-21 Thread Ted Hopp
. Don't minimize the responsibilities that come with power. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?

2004-05-21 Thread Ted Hopp
On Friday, May 21, 2004 12:06 AM, James Kass wrote: Doesn't the idea that so many people will embrace a new Phoenician range imply that it's the right thing to do? No. It implies that Unicode calls the shots, for better or worse. I don't accept that might makes right. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D

Re: Phoenician (was, Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?; was, Archaic-Greek/Palaeo-Hebrew; was, interleaved ordering; was, Phoenician)

2004-05-20 Thread Ted Hopp
forward to a Rashi script proposal? Surely not. There is a surfeit of proof by forceful assertion on both sides of this argument. Very little by way of clear rationale. (And saying it's in the roadmap just begs the question.) Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453

Re: Merging combining classes, was: New contribution N2676

2003-10-26 Thread Ted Hopp
, there is the problem of distinguishing between vav haluma and holam male, for one. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Cursor movement in Hebrew, was: Non-ascii string processing?

2003-10-09 Thread Ted Hopp
position are useless as a visual indication to the user of what's going on. One might even need to include some sort of glyph highlighting to make clear the state of the text entry system. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace

Re: Public Review Issue #23

2003-10-09 Thread Ted Hopp
and it jumped to the next verse. Comments? I agree. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: [Way OT] Beer measurements (was: Re: Handwritten EURO sign)

2003-08-19 Thread Ted Hopp
telescope there fell over in a storm years ago, so never mind. Personally, I prefer base 60 and base 16 to base 10. (But please, this is not an attempt to link this thread, whatever it is, to the Hexadecimal thread. 50159344557) Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453

Re: [Way OT] Beer measurements (was: Re: Handwritten EURO sign)

2003-08-17 Thread Ted Hopp
Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Hexadecimal

2003-08-16 Thread Ted Hopp
sending this email as an RTL document, and it corrects the comma problem on my screen. Ted P.S. Of course, there are few other problems for the LTR stuff (like where the punctuation ends up at the end of the line). Ted Hopp, Ph.D.ZigZag, Inc.[EMAIL PROTECTED]+1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your

Re: Display of Isolated Nonspacing Marks (was Re: Questions on ZWNBS...)

2003-08-05 Thread Ted Hopp
assigns only a single value to each character. I believe that reasonable people might reasonably conclude from factoids 1 and 2 that SPACE is indeed a format character. Reasonable, but evidently wrong. Explanation, please? Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Hopp
anything but a dot, certainly not a holam male. Let's encode Hebrew, not dots. It may mean changes to what SIL, UniScribe, and others are doing, but there's no free lunch here. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Hopp
Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Hopp
? For reasons I posted earlier, I don't think encoding the dot is the right approach. I'd propose something that would look like this in the UCD (with 'nn' to be determined, but it should be in the Hebrew block): 05nn;HEBREW VOWEL HOLAM MALE;Lo;0;R;compat 05D5 05B9N; Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Hopp
conditions, it may be a viable alternative. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Hopp
On Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ted Hopp wrote on 07/31/2003 12:12:34 PM: I'd propose something that would look like this in the UCD (with 'nn' to be determined, but it should be in the Hebrew block): 05nn;HEBREW VOWEL HOLAM MALE;Lo;0;R;compat 05D5 05B9N

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Hopp
in a /hataf vowel/ (but never centred in /hataf patah/), six times to the left and twice to the right. But the example you posted earlier from BHS showed the meteg centered in a hataf patah. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Hopp
convention requires Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Hopp
On Thursday, July 31, 2003 4:04 PM, John Cowan wrote: Ted Hopp scripsit: I strongly prefer adding a holam male (base) character as opposed to adding a new combining mark. For what reasons? 1. It corresponds to standard Hebrew grammar. 2. It would be simple and easy to explain to users

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Hopp
On Thursday, July 31, 2003 4:58 PM, John Hudson wrote: At 01:18 PM 7/31/2003, Ted Hopp wrote: There are exactly two Hebrew vowels that are spacing glyphs: holam male and shuruq. Neither one is encoded in Unicode. Neither one is a Hebrew letter (in the traditional sense) nor is either

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Hopp
to a new base character. If this is so, I'd appreciate an explanation of why, because I don't understand it. Assertions of the form Mark X is only used with base form Y have proven to be false too often in the past. All the more reason to avoid introducing more marks. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Hopp
On Thursday, July 31, 2003 5:06 PM, John Cowan wrote: Ted Hopp scripsit: 1. It corresponds to standard Hebrew grammar. 2. It would be simple and easy to explain to users, edit, handle in keyboards, etc. It would be no problem to have a holam male key that generated two consecutive

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Hopp
. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Hopp
dots. :) Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: From [b-hebrew] Variant forms of vav with holem

2003-07-30 Thread Ted Hopp
markup, which can apparently solve all problems). Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Back to Hebrew -holem-waw vs waw-holem

2003-07-30 Thread Ted Hopp
straight-forward. For the people trying to actually use the encoding, it's going to take a lot of context to determine what you've got. Yes, indeed. Nothing like an encoding that can't be decoded. :) Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal

Re: Back to Hebrew -holem-waw vs waw-holem

2003-07-30 Thread Ted Hopp
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:39 PM, Kent Karlsson wrote: Ted Hopp wrote: When I first saw it, I had assumed that FB4B was supposed to be used for kholam male (and that's what we use it for in our code). FB4B;HEBREW LETTER VAV WITH HOLAM;Lo;0;R;05D5 05B9N; FB4B is *canonically

Re: From [b-hebrew] Variant forms of vav with holem

2003-07-30 Thread Ted Hopp
it. (Witness the effort put forth by the UYIP folks in getting HEBREW LETTER YOD WITH HIRIQ [FB1D] accepted.) Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-30 Thread Ted Hopp
Where is a kholam attached to the right of an alef? Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-30 Thread Ted Hopp
of Numbers 15:40 (seventh word for those who don't count maqaf as a word break). The images were scanned from The Tanach, Stone Edition, Mesorah Publications, New York, 1996. The book includes the credit Typography by CompuScribe at ArtScroll Studios, Ltd. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL

Re: From [b-hebrew] Variant forms of vav with holem

2003-07-30 Thread Ted Hopp
proposal should be prepared to push it through the system. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Back to Hebrew -holem-waw vs waw-holem

2003-07-30 Thread Ted Hopp
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ted Hopp wrote on 07/29/2003 01:20:08 PM: The two vowels kholam male and shuruq have nothing to do with the consonant vav (HEBREW LETTER VAV) other than that they are written with the same glyph. If they are written

Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

2003-07-30 Thread Ted Hopp
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 7:09 PM, Peter Kirk wrote: On 30/07/2003 15:28, Ted Hopp wrote: Where is a kholam attached to the right of an alef? Well, for a start in every occurrence of ro'sh head, lo' not, zo't this (f.), vayyo'mer and he said and several other common words in the Bible

Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew

2003-07-29 Thread Ted Hopp
4.0 chapters will be posted online very soon -- at which point it would be helpful if everyone concerned about this issue takes the time to read the latest on these characters in particular. Any schedule on when this required reading will be available? Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL

Re: Back to Hebrew -holem-waw vs waw-holem

2003-07-29 Thread Ted Hopp
, should there be an alphabetic presentation form for sheva na? With that, I'll leave off. Ted (not content with a focussed discussion) Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Back to Hebrew -holem-waw vs waw-holem

2003-07-29 Thread Ted Hopp
code points for each use of vav. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew

2003-07-28 Thread Ted Hopp
, but I just want to know if that's what you are saying. Also, I don't understand in what sense the normalization *algorithm* gets broken by changing combining classes. Could someone elaborate? Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning

Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew

2003-07-28 Thread Ted Hopp
of combining classes that would break (in ways apart from normalization breaking) if the assignments for the Hebrew vowels were changed? We might as well be sure that we know the entire scope of the issues involved. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE

Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew

2003-07-25 Thread Ted Hopp
from others on this list about what the specific technical (not political) impacts would be (both positive and negative) on their work and their products that would come from fixing the combining classes of the existing vowels. Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE

Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew

2003-07-25 Thread Ted Hopp
Thanks, Ken. That sensitizes me to some of the problems involved with breaking stability. If I recall correctly, the suggestion for using CGJ for yerushala(y)im was to encode it as: ...lamed, patah, cgj, hiriq, final mem. Also, I seem to recall that this gave some people heartburn because CGJ was

Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew

2003-07-08 Thread Ted Hopp
On 08/07/2003 13:01, Peter Kirk wrote: [regarding Haralambous] ... can you remind us of the reference and if possible the URL? Typesetting the Holy Bible in Hebrew, with TEX Yannis Haralambous EuroTEX Proceedings 1994 TUGboat 15(3):174-191, September, 1994 I've found it on-line at:

Deprecated vs. strongly discouraged?

2003-07-08 Thread Ted Hopp
bathamasat, were deprecated. Four others are strongly discouraged. Is it just me, or is the language from the web site confusing? (I know--it's just me. :-)) Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http

Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew

2003-07-07 Thread Ted Hopp
for only the small number of attested sequences. In view of this principle, the current combining class values are at odds with definition D46 (combining class; section 3.11) as well as with the discussion in 2.10 on multiple combining characters. That is what should be fixed. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D

Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew

2003-07-07 Thread Ted Hopp
regarding modern Hebrew character usage. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Re: Arabic/Hebrew coding for the Mac

2003-07-06 Thread Ted Hopp
-in, and Apple is very committed to good Java support on OS X. Regards, Ted P.S. Backwards is only if you think forwards means left-to-right. Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com

Re: Biblical Hebrew (U+034F Combining Grapheme Joiner works)

2003-07-04 Thread Ted Hopp
trying to do it right by working through the political process with these other organizations. The time it takes is time well spent. Ted Hopp Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/