08 directories in 66138 ms using 21 threads
>
> c:\proj>tdir c:\ 8
> 39708 directories in 69307 ms using 8 threads
>
> c:\proj>tdir c:\ 4
> 39708 directories in 70539 ms using 4 threads
>
> c:\proj>tdir c:\ 16
> 39708 directories in 76392 ms using 32 threads
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan
2010. As I recall this was before the multi-threading versions were widely available. I think multi-threading is underrepresented in Rosetta/Unicon. If you come up with a multi-threading version, we should add it to the post as an alternative version. If you don't feel comfortable doing this, p
4 threads
>>
>> c:\proj>tdir c:\ 4
>> 39708 directories in 87650 ms using 4 threads
>>
>> c:\proj>tdir c:\ 1
>> 39708 directories in 92525 ms using 1 threads
>>
>> c:\proj>tdir c:\ 4
>> 39708 directories in 95655 ms using 4 threads
>
tories in 76392 ms using 32 threads
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:25 PM, David Gamey
wrote:
Sergey,
I am responsible for much of the Rosetta code contributions
(thanks also to Steve, Andrew, Matt, >>>>>>>>Peter, and about 4
others) and this one in particular dating fro
5 PM, David Gamey
> wrote:
>
> Sergey,
>
> I am responsible for much of the Rosetta code contributions (thanks also
> to Steve, Andrew, Matt, Peter, and about 4 others) and this one in
> particular dating from 2010. As I recall this was before the
> multi-threading versions
ons (thanks
also to Steve, Andrew, Matt, Peter, >>>>>>and about 4 others) and
this one in particular dating from 2010. As I recall this was
before the multi->>>>>>threading versions were widely available. I
think multi-threading is underrepresented in Rosetta/
ome up with a multi-threading version, we should add it to the post as an alternative version. If you don't feel comfortable doing this, post the code and I can add it. David From: Sergey Logichev <slogic...@yandex.ru> To: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <to.ja...@gmail.com> Cc: Unicon group &
the
> multi-threading versions were widely available. I think multi-threading is
> underrepresented in Rosetta/Unicon.
>
> If you come up with a multi-threading version, we should add it to the
> post as an alternative version. If you don't feel comfortable doing this,
> pos
f you don't feel comfortable doing this, post the code and I can add it. David From: Sergey Logichev <slogic...@yandex.ru> To: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <to.ja...@gmail.com> Cc: Unicon group <unicon-group@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 1:16 AM Subject: Re
Very cool. I likely wont get to this for a few days.
From: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh
To: David Gamey
Cc: Unicon group
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Unicon-group] Walk of file directory
Here is a slightly tweaked/reformatted version. It now by default auto
ing versions were widely available. I think multi-threading is
>> underrepresented in Rosetta/Unicon.
>>
>> If you come up with a multi-threading version, we should add it to the
>> post as an alternative version. If you don't feel comfortable doing this,
>> post the code and I can add it.
&g
and I can add it.
>
> David
>
> --
> *From:* Sergey Logichev
> *To:* Jafar Al-Gharaibeh
> *Cc:* Unicon group
> *Sent:* Sunday, January 11, 2015 1:16 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Unicon-group] Walk of file directory
>
> Jafar,
>
> T
e attributes, determine if something is a directory, etc. I do know the Unicon book has an example program that walks through directories recursively. Cheers,ClintFrom: Sergey Logichev <slogic...@yandex.ru> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:05 AM To: David Gamey; Jafar Al-Gharaibeh Cc: Unicon g
le
>> program that walks through directories recursively.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Clint
>> --
>> *From:* Sergey Logichev
>> *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 3:05 AM
>> *To:* David Gamey; Jafar Al-Gharaibeh
>>
ok has an example
> program that walks through directories recursively.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Clint
> --
> *From:* Sergey Logichev
> *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 3:05 AM
> *To:* David Gamey; Jafar Al-Gharaibeh
> *Cc:* Unicon group
>
> *S
bject: Re: [Unicon-group] Walk of file directory
David,
Ok, I will try to implement it myself at first. If I will be in trouble I ask
you help, sure. In any case I will inform Unicon group about it.
It would be great to implement file search directly in Unicon. As Jafar
mentioned, we already may
<to.ja...@gmail.com> Cc: Unicon group <unicon-group@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 1:16 AM Subject: Re: [Unicon-group] Walk of file directory Jafar, Thank you for a whole bundle of advices and suggestions! Threads are worth to try. The thought of search by file attributes is
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 1:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Unicon-group] Walk of file directory
Jafar, Thank you for a whole bundle of advices and suggestions! Threads are
worth to try. The thought of search by file attributes is very useful too. Your
suggestion about slow I/O partly is right. For U
Jafar, Thank you for a whole bundle of advices and suggestions! Threads are worth to try. The thought of search by file attributes is very useful too. Your suggestion about slow I/O partly is right. For UNIX I tried the program on Raspberry Pi with 6 Class microSD as HDD (it's slow, agree). But for
Sergey,
There are so many things that came to mind when I saw your program.
1- At the end of your email, sourceforge ad says "Go Parallel", Which is
not a bad idea for this highly parallel application.
There is a similar program "wordcount" listed in my dissertation
(available on unicon.org)
20 matches
Mail list logo
