[UC-Announce] Penn Bookstore This Week

2007-01-21 Thread Christine Hibbard
Penn Bookstore This Week 3601 Walnut Street, Philadelphia 215.898.7595 www.upenn.edu/bookstore FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Christine Hibbard We have an exciting week of events. Please join us! Monday, January 22 at 5:00 p.m. Rita Barnard will present Apartheid and Beyond: South

[UC] The Historic Commission has ruled against paint!

2007-01-21 Thread Elizabeth F Campion
In 2003, pro-HD folks insisted the Historic Commission would NEVER regulate paint, despite contradictory words in the HC ordinance. I investigated, discovered and revealed an action against a privately commissioned mural placed on a side / alley wall of a property on 410 S. 15th (S. of Pine) in

Re: [UC] The Historic Commission has ruled against paint!

2007-01-21 Thread Frank
I saw that article, too. I have really mixed feelings about this mural. I used to live at the other end of the alley from it. When I discovered it I couldn't stop laughing. It's small which is a point in its favor but it's so poorly conceived and executed. It really looks to me like it was

Re: [UC] The Historic Commission has ruled against paint!

2007-01-21 Thread Ross Bender
I have definitely mixed feelings about Bonnie Prince Charlie's visit. His wife wears remarkably weird hats. (See photo donated by Liz: http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=localid=4931951 ). And will I ever be able to forgive him for what he did to Lady Di? Maybe I'll go picket the visit.

Re: [UC] The Historic Commission has ruled against paint!

2007-01-21 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 1/21/2007 8:12:13 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have definitely mixed feelings about Bonnie Prince Charlie's visit. His wife wears remarkably weird hats. I've asked her not to wear one when I take them on the tour of Historic Clark Park, prior

[UC] Accountant to do taxes?

2007-01-21 Thread John Ellingsworth
Does anyone use an accountant to do their taxes? I would appreciate any recommendations. -- Regards, John Ellingsworth You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.

[UC] case dismissed

2007-01-21 Thread pmuyehara
Bruce knows he wrote to me privately many times with harsh language and insults. So far, that's one private message and it is debateably contains harsh language and insults. And to be fair, the message to which it responds could be characterized the same way. It seems that you've overstated

Fwd: [UC] Today's walk in the park

2007-01-21 Thread pmuyehara
Isn't that 1939 photo at 44th rather than 43rd? Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; UnivCity@list.purple.com Sent: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 2:09 PM Subject: [UC] Today's walk in the park To those of you who walked in Park A with Chris Leswing

RE: [UC] case dismissed

2007-01-21 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
The messages I sent to the list was to show Bruce naming me as a Listserv Police and The Listserv Sheriff which he denied. I also wanted to establish an on-going harassment by Bruce on and off-list over a period of time. I sent the messages after receiving comments on and off-list questioning if

Re: [UC] The Historic Commission has ruled against paint!

2007-01-21 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
Frank wrote: Rizzo, Sinatra, Lanza, Labelle, the pixelated trees, that weird submarine/welder thing in South Philly and the animals outside the Morris Animal Refuge. Keep those, though. my favorite is 'the pixelated trees' at 13th and pine, also known as 'springtime', by david guinn. it's

Re: [UC] The Historic Commission has ruled against paint!

2007-01-21 Thread Elizabeth F Campion
Thanks Frank. I am glad you are familiar with the mural. In defense of the quality of the mural, it suffered mid-project redesign in response to threats from the HD. And it has remained unfinished, pending permission to stay, from the HC. Viewers are seeing the cartoon or sub-painting. I think

Re: FW: [UC] Won't you be my neighbor?

2007-01-21 Thread B Andersen
- That was made publicly to the listserve. - That was not a private note. - That did not use profanity. - That did not threaten violence. - That did not name any individual as a listserve sheriff. On 1/20/07, S. Sharrieff Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: with permission.

Re: FW: [UC] Update: Walmart Class Action Suit (Plaintiffs Win Liability Phase)

2007-01-21 Thread B Andersen
- That was made publicly to the listserve. - That was not a private note. - That did not use profanity. - That did not threaten violence. - That did not name any individual as the listserve sheriff. On 1/20/07, S. Sharrieff Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: with permission.

Re: FW: [UC] NOISE

2007-01-21 Thread B Andersen
- That was made publicly to the listserve. - That was not a private note. - That did not use profanity. - That did not threaten violence. On 1/20/07, S. Sharrieff Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: with permission. -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL

Re: FW: [UC] Wal-Mart and its treatment of Pennsylvania workers on trial in Philadelphia

2007-01-21 Thread B Andersen
- That did not use profanity. - That did not threaten violence. - That did not name any individual as a listserve sheriff. On 1/20/07, S. Sharrieff Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: with permission. -Original Message- *From:* B Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday,

Re: [UC] case dismissed

2007-01-21 Thread B Andersen
- I never publicly named anyone as the listserve police. I named you once as the listserve sherrif (though I have grown to like the term and use it when I can). - One private message asking who died and made you the police does not constitute on-going harassment. I don't believe there

Re: [UC] case dismissed

2007-01-21 Thread SKnight
MessageSharrieff, We all have personas when we post to the list. Those personas may not be so much like our personalities. Yours has always seemed a bit pompous, like your tie was too tight. But after watching you go ballistic after being called the List Sheriff, certainly a lame play on

Re: [UC] case dismissed

2007-01-21 Thread SKnight
Sharrieff, What is placism? - Original Message - From: B Andersenmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: UnivCity@list.purple.commailto:UnivCity@list.purple.com Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 3:21 PM Subject: Re: [UC] case dismissed a.. I never publicly named anyone as the

Re: [UC] Accountant to do taxes?

2007-01-21 Thread Freda Egnal
I use, and recommend, Deborah Giles. She lives on the 4600 block of Cedar Avenue. Her phone number is 2145-2026, John Ellingsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone use an accountant to do their taxes? I would appreciate any recommendations. -- Regards, John Ellingsworth You are

Re: [UC] Accountant to do taxes?

2007-01-21 Thread Cindy Miller
John-- When I started my business in 1997, I realized that I had better use an accountant, because the City taxes and refunds, etc. are so complicated.( And the workers at the Department of Revenue are SO clueless) Anyway, I began to use an old friend of mine--Wally Moyer @ The Bottom

Re: [UC] Clark Park Jan 18 Meeting: Video Now Available

2007-01-21 Thread Brian Siano
Bill Sanderson wrote: Absolutely brilliant--Listening to it now. Would love to be able to see the slides--are they at the web site? They are now. Browse to http://www.clarkpark.info, and select the Park A page. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named

[UC] Friends of Clark Park: Jan 18th Meeting Part 1 Video Available

2007-01-21 Thread Brian Siano
At our Jan. 18th Public Meeting, in addition to the discussion of the Park 'A.' Redesign, we also spent a half an hour on the upcoming Party for the Park fundraiser. Party planner Mark Byerly spoke about his hopes and strategies for the project. The video of this portion of the meeting is

Re: [UC] case dismissed

2007-01-21 Thread SKnight
MessageAnd you said I didn't have a sense of humor.. And you just proved it. sk - Original Message - From: S. Sharrieff Alimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: UnivCity Listservmailto:UnivCity@list.purple.com Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 11:04 PM Subject: RE: [UC] case dismissed