philippe_44 wrote:
> What improvements do you precisely expect from that? I have a hard time
> to draw any causality with sq
Exactly my question as well. I hope it is not some audiophile
folklore
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of
lol. Yes we are testing.
piCorePlayer a small player for the Raspberry Pi in RAM.
Homepage: https://www.picoreplayer.org
Please 'donate'
(https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donations=U7JHY5WYHCNRU=GB_code=USD=PP%2dDonationsBF%3abtn_donateCC_LG%2egif%3aNonHosted)
if you like the
paul- wrote:
> We follow the RPi foundations kernels. They just released 5.15, which I
> would imagine will be the standard kernel for most of this year.
hi paul,
us, repo-watchers, have started noticing kernel 5.15.21 and a 8.2.0b1
:cool:
zaurux wrote:
> It seems that without using a realtime kernel, the preempt function
> improves things.
> In theory, from version 5.16, this feature improves and becomes "full"
> (with a lower latency without using a realtime kernel).
> I am not a specialist and able to produce exotic kernels
Thank you Paul for this complement. I thought piCore was keeping up with
TinyCore which has moved to 5.15.10 with version 13.
Hopefully the RPI foundation will be upgraded kernel to 5.16, faster
than expected with the announce of mainline kernel support for PI
compute 4.
zaurux wrote:
>
>
> When will the 5.16 kernel be available in piCorePlayer ? :)
>
>
We follow the RPi foundations kernels. They just released 5.15, which I
would imagine will be the standard kernel for most of this year.
piCorePlayer a small player for the Raspberry Pi in RAM.
zaurux wrote:
> It seems that without using a realtime kernel, the preempt function
> improves things.
> In theory, from version 5.16, this feature improves and becomes "full"
> (with a lower latency without using a realtime kernel).
> I am not a specialist and able to produce exotic kernels
