Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] debian upgrade to 7.4
Just out of curiosity will 7.3.4 make it to Debian stable? -- bernt 'LastFM' (http://www.last.fm/user/ottovonkopp/) SB3, SB BOOM - SC 7.3.3 - Ubuntu Server 9.04 iPod Touch\iPeng bernt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1342 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=68458 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Problems with Ubuntu 5.10 Breezy Badger
pfarrell;467897 Wrote: Perhaps, but in Ubuntu land, even a year is too old to expect support. I had problems with upgrading a 7.10 to 8.04, and so held off until 8.10 was out and patched. Then I found that you can/could not upgrade from 7.10 to 8.10, you had to do the incremental steps. Made me really grumble. As you've probably found out, with Ubuntu you have three sane choices: * dist-upgrade every six months * use long term support releases and dist-upgrade every 18-24 months * use long term support releases and re-install every 5 years (for server) I don't think these options are unreasonable and they clearly show how your comment doesn't paint the whole picture. I think the options aren't clearly communicated to people installing, though. The original poster was being unreasonable, in my opinion: Ubuntu 5.10 has been unsupported for two and a half years already, we can't expect Logitech to keep supporting stuff that even the OS vendor doesn't. Comparing Ubuntu to XP is not too relevant either since the upgrade solution is so different: Since 5.10 Ubuntu have made 700% more OS releases than Microsoft in the same time... Bottom line: Remember to think about support/upgrade issues when selecting an OS. A single upgrade in 2006 or later would have brought 0xdeadbeef to a Long Term Support release which is still supported on the server for a couple of years by Ubuntu (and which seems to be still supported by Logitech as well). 0xdeadbeef: This is probably too late for you but the original bug is probably this one: https://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=14466 -- jku jku's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8144 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=68992 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Problems with Ubuntu 5.10 Breezy Badger
If you don't like to uppgrade use Ubuntu LTS. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS Ubuntu LTS Server have support for 5 years. The current is 8.04 LTS. The next LTS release will be in april 2010. I've been on 8.04 LTS since it came out but I found it to boring (just works) so I removed the LTS key and upgraded to 9.04. I only lost WoL in the process so that was a kind of boring to. ;) -- bernt 'LastFM' (http://www.last.fm/user/ottovonkopp/) SB3, SB BOOM - SC 7.3.3 - Ubuntu Server 9.04 iPod Touch\iPeng bernt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1342 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=68992 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] script to create a list of missing cover art
And to remove unwanted m3u playlists this might help ;-)
Code:
#!/bin/bash
#
LIBRARY=/library/music
#
number=`find $LIBRARY -name *.m3u -print | wc -l`
find $LIBRARY -name *.m3u -exec rm -f {} \;
echo $number playlistfiles have been removed!
Ronald.
--
tingtong5
tingtong5's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9671
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69324
___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
[SlimDevices: Unix] Upsampling on linux
Put the following line in your convert.conf file and you wil have realtime upsampling from 1...@44.1khz to 2...@96khz for your transporter. Code: flc flc * * [sox] -v0.995 -buffer 32768 -t flac -r44100 -2 -c2 $FILE$ -t flac -C0 -3 -c2 -r96000 - polyphase -cutoff 1.0 Change 96000 to 48000 if you have a squeezebox instead. This was not my own invention but I tested it and it works fine :-) Ronald -- tingtong5 tingtong5's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9671 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69325 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Upsampling on linux
It was not my intention to start a discussion about upsampling, some people like it, others don't. Just offering a way to try it for free ;-) -- tingtong5 tingtong5's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9671 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69325 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
[SlimDevices: Unix] 7.4 SqueezeSlave and Linux
Hi, I just updated a Vortexbox install of SqueezeCenter/SqueezeBoxServer from 7.3x to 7.4 and am having new problems with SqueezeSlave. Vortexbox runs SqueezeBoxServer on Fedora 11 (Version: 7.4.0 - r28672 @ Mon Sep 28 17:49:55 PDT 2009, Operating system: Red Hat - EN - utf8, Platform Architecture: i686-linux) and includes a compiled version of SqueezeSlave for local playback. The problem - On 7.3x, SqueezeSlave 0.9-65 (compile flags: linux portaudio:1899 signals interactive), would play music for weeks, without a problem. Now runing 7.4, switching from Internet radio to local flac files ripped from CDs almost always causes SqueezeSlave to lose connection/disappear from Web interface and stop playing music, requiring a service restart or reboot. When I check http://sourceforge.net/projects/softsqueeze/files/squeezeslave/ there does not seem to be any newer/improved compiled linux version available that will run on the VortexBox/Fedora system. Over on the Vortexbox forum, at least one other user has experienced this new problem with 7.4, SqueezeSlave and Vortexbox/Fedora. Anyone else having 7.4, SqueezeSlave, Linux problems? Any thoughts on a new/updated SqueezeSlave for i686 Linux? Thanks -- nowork nowork's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20453 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69338 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] debian upgrade to 7.4
bernt;468173 Wrote: Just out of curiosity will 7.3.4 make it to Debian stable? stable Version: 7.4.0 testing Version: 7.4.1~28791 unstable Version: 7.5.0~28792 -- Millwood 2 SB3, 1 Duet Debian Lenny server 2 AP (netgear, linksys) wireless network. Millwood's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3600 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=68458 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] debian upgrade to 7.4
Millwood;468411 Wrote: stable Version: 7.4.0 testing Version: 7.4.1~28791 unstable Version: 7.5.0~28792 Ok, so how do I upgrade from 7.3.3 to 7.3.4? I read somewhere that 7.3.4 has a fix for dns issues. I'm not ready for 7.4 yet. -- bernt 'LastFM' (http://www.last.fm/user/ottovonkopp/) SB3, SB BOOM - SC 7.3.3 - Ubuntu Server 9.04 iPod Touch\iPeng bernt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1342 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=68458 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Problems with Ubuntu 5.10 Breezy Badger
jku wrote: As you've probably found out, with Ubuntu you have three sane choices: * dist-upgrade every six months * use long term support releases and dist-upgrade every 18-24 months * use long term support releases and re-install every 5 years (for server) I don't think these options are unreasonable and they clearly show how your comment doesn't paint the whole picture. I think the options aren't clearly communicated to people installing, though. Yes, there are these choices. But IMHO, you are better off with Debian, which naturally values stability and long term support when you are doing a server. My slimserver/squeezecenter/squeezebox server is a Debian install. The update every six months and never skip a cycle is not a good choice for a server. My music server stayed up over a year, no crashes and no touching by a human. For servers, a Ubuntu LTS is clearly better than their latest and greatest general packaging. But I prefer Debian for servers. Same cost, 99% the same GUI, 100% the same admin tools. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] debian upgrade to 7.4
Running 7.4 on debian without any problems ^_^ -- tingtong5 tingtong5's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9671 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=68458 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Problems with Ubuntu 5.10 Breezy Badger
pfarrell;468421 Wrote: But IMHO, you are better off with Debian, which naturally values stability and long term support when you are doing a server. Like I said, I agree with your choice of OS: I'd go with Debian as well if I was building a SBS machine now. Things just seem to work better... Still, saying that Debian somehow naturally values long term support (compared to Ubuntu) is wrong. Debian releases are supported a year after a new stable is released. For Etch this means only three years total, after that you have to upgrade. I've already been using my Ubuntu 6.06 server for three years and intend to keep using it until EOL in 2011 (at least if the bug I linked to gets fixed ;))... -- jku jku's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8144 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=68992 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
[SlimDevices: Unix] Starting stopping MusicIP?
On my old ubuntu system I think I just added it to rc.local and it always started before Squeezecenter since Squeezecenter always starts slow anyway. I'm adding it to my new Readynas which is based on Debian etch, and I was wondering what other people do to start/stop MusicIP? I just usually run the nohup xxx is there a better way? Does it make sense to integrate it into the init.d script for Squeezecenter? TIA -- sander sander's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10737 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69343 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] debian upgrade to 7.4
tingtong5;468424 Wrote: Running 7.4 on debian without any problems ^_^ Don't think Squeezeslave and Server Power Control is supported on 7.4. Not yet anyway. -- bernt 'LastFM' (http://www.last.fm/user/ottovonkopp/) SB3, SB BOOM - SC 7.3.3 - Ubuntu Server 9.04 iPod Touch\iPeng bernt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1342 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=68458 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] 7.4 SqueezeSlave and Linux
I'm also finding it a bit less stable. Changing tracks rapidly often freezes it up. And in general it needs to be restarted more often than it used to. Not really helpful, but you're not alone. -- bhaagensen bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69338 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] debian upgrade to 7.4
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:04 AM, bernt bernt.3zow7z1254924...@no-mx.forums.slimdevices.com wrote: Ok, so how do I upgrade from 7.3.3 to 7.3.4? I read somewhere that 7.3.4 has a fix for dns issues. Download the .deb. here: http://downloads.slimdevices.com/SqueezeCenter_v7.3.4/ Then install using dpkg or any other dpkg-type-tool. Ben ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] BrutefirDRC version 1.1.1 for Squeezeboxcenter 7.4.0 released
Thanks! Currently I am not using drc/brutefir, but good to know its possible in 7.4 as well :-) -- tingtong5 tingtong5's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9671 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69181 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] 7.4 SqueezeSlave and Linux
unfortunately i have given up ont eh software players for now. it is a major disappointment because i think them a differentiator for the squeeze approach. as i have said before, i would *pay* for a working, robust player software. -- pablolie ...pablo Server: Shuttle X27 - Ubuntu 9.04 - SBS 7.4 Sources: SB3 (3), SB Boom (3), Duet, Accuphase DP65v CD Amplifier: Accuphase E306v - Creek OBH21/22 Loudspeakers: Ceeroy 3-way tower (tuned) - Audioengine 5/S8 - Acoustic Energy Aego M Headphones: Grado SR-1 pablolie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3816 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69338 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] 7.4 SqueezeSlave and Linux
I have had problems with newer versions of squeezeslave and Ubuntu so I have pretty much frozen on an older version. I use squeezeslave 0.8-25 with server version 7.4 without problems. However, everything I play is mp3 so I don't know how stable it is with flac or internet radio formats. My command line is /usr/bin/padsp /usr/local/bin/squeezeslave -s server.ip.address -- jth jth's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69338 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] debian upgrade to 7.4
GoodVibrations;468114 Wrote: Hi epoch1970, I'm running 7.3.3 on Debian Etch and am thinking about upgrading to 7.4. But I'm not very keen on having to manually enter all my finetuned settings again. :-) Could you please list the directories/files you copied over from your SC install to your SBS install to keep your setting/plugins-setting etc? TIA I tarred and copied: - /var/lib/squeezecenter/prefs - /var/lib/squeezecenter/Plugins (some leftovers installed manually. not needed if only using extension downloader which is a better option) - /var/lib/squeezecenter/cache/InstalledPlugins/Plugins and installed that under the same locations for squeezeboxserver. Make sure you make a copy of the pristine prefs! Doing the above I had hosed my Customize Controller plugin. Extension downloader said the plugin failed to load. The solution was to put back the squeezeboxserver version of the preference for that (factory-installed) plugin. There are other threads on the subject. Maybe you want to check further. My platform is xubuntu 8.10. -- epoch1970 epoch1970's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16711 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=68458 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] BrutefirDRC version 1.1.1 for Squeezeboxcenter 7.4.0 released
There are two issues that need to be fixed, but the next release should be out soon with no known open bugs. So if you want to switch/start you should probably wait for version 1.1.2. -- Klaas Creator of *BrutefirDrc* see http://klaasprause.com/brutefirdrc Hardware: Squeezebox v3 with digital out tweaking and custom power supply, Tact TDA2200 Digital Amplifier, MBL 311-D Speaker Klaas's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8026 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69181 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] 7.4 SqueezeSlave and Linux
jth;468475 Wrote: I have had problems with newer versions of squeezeslave and Ubuntu so I have pretty much frozen on an older version. I use squeezeslave 0.8-25 with server version 7.4 without problems. However, everything I play is mp3 so I don't know how stable it is with flac or internet radio formats. My command line is /usr/bin/padsp /usr/local/bin/squeezeslave -s server.ip.address Interesting, why are you using padsp? Did you find this more stable? You must be using the OSS version of SqueezeSlave not the ALSA version right? -- agillis rip, tag, get cover art All you do is insert the CD! http://vortexbox.org agillis Lead Developer VortexBox agillis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21140 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69338 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] 7.4 on FreeBSD 7.2
I have ported version 7.4.0 o FreeBSD and it hss been running very well the last few days. I've send all information to the maintainer of the squeezecenter port so hopefully it won't take too long before it appears in the ports-tree -- HansS HansS's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22792 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=68968 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Squeezeslave problems
I've been testing an asio version of squeezeslave for win32 for the last week. I don't have any high end PC audio cards so I've been using the 'asio4all' (http://www.asio4all.com/) driver. I've noticed no difference in performance over the normal direct sound version using this driver. It's temporarily available 'here' (http://ralph_irving.users.sourceforge.net/squeezeslave-asio-0.9-84-win32.zip). Please report your findings in this thread. Depending on the results, I'll add it to the downloads directory on sf.net. -- ralphy ralphy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3484 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57746 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] BrutefirDRC version 1.1.1 for Squeezeboxcenter 7.4.0 released
a new release is out: 1.1.2 Fixed: 1. Logging error using old squeezecenter dir 2. Missing conversion data for AIFF files 3. BITRATE fix. Removed all resampling for files different to MP3, because it did not work correctly. If anyone is using other sampling rates to 44100 it would be great to get a test file to use for implement a working support for this. it should work for all types of output, i.e. FLAC, PCM and MP3. I could only test with flac files and hope that all other file types are working fine. If you encounter any file type that is not supported drop me a note and I am going to fix it. To support more file types without guessing, I would need a test file in the specified format, because I am to lazy to convert or search for all the supported format of SqueezeBoxCenter without knowing that anyone is using them :) -- Klaas Creator of *BrutefirDrc* see http://klaasprause.com/brutefirdrc Hardware: Squeezebox v3 with digital out tweaking and custom power supply, Tact TDA2200 Digital Amplifier, MBL 311-D Speaker Klaas's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8026 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69181 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] suspend in Linux
Hi epoch1970, Very appreciate your support what I could see from the server ... before the suspend... Code: host001:/usr/sbin # ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0: Supported ports: [ TP ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Full Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Full Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Speed: 1000Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: Twisted Pair PHYAD: 0 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: on Supports Wake-on: pumbg Wake-on: g Current message level: 0x0033 (51) Link detected: yes host001:/usr/sbin # cat /proc/acpi/wakeup Device Sleep state Status SLPB 4* enabled P32 4disabled PEX0 4disabled PEX1 4disabled PEX2 4disabled PEX3 4disabled PEX4 4disabled PEX5 4disabled UHC1 3disabled UHC2 3disabled UHC3 3disabled UHC4 3disabled EHCI 3disabled AC9M 4disabled AZAL 4disabled now I suspend the system and it goes into suspend well green light is on on the MB, but the adapter shows... - no any indication of live when I power the system down - there is still a green light on the network adapter and it is even blinking when some packets are coming to it I've tries - I can wake it from the shutdown mode what I could see from the server ... after the suspend... Code: host001:/usr/sbin # ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0: Supported ports: [ TP ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Full Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Full Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Speed: 1000Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: Twisted Pair PHYAD: 0 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: on Supports Wake-on: pumbg Wake-on: g Current message level: 0x0033 (51) Link detected: yes host001:/usr/sbin # cat /proc/acpi/wakeup Device Sleep state Status SLPB 4* enabled P32 4disabled PEX0 4disabled PEX1 4disabled PEX2 4disabled PEX3 4disabled PEX4 4disabled PEX5 4disabled UHC1 3disabled UHC2 3disabled UHC3 3disabled UHC4 3disabled EHCI 3disabled AC9M 4disabled AZAL 4disabled it is exactly the same output. what I've understood from it: WOL is on Code: Wake-on: g to get the system suspended... I just type s2ram -f -a2 -s no any automation yet - this would be the next step I've checked file: Code: /etc/init.d/halt as it was suggested by you in one of posts I have no any indication in regards to Code: NETDOWN=yes visible difference is: before suspend I could go into init 5 mode and after x server was showing some rubbish trying to get X loaded and after the crash it tries to load itself in the endless loop - I've checked lspci -vv there is an extraction from the output: Code: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0 I/O behind bridge: 1000-1fff Memory behind bridge: 9010-901f Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 9000-900f Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR- NoISA+ VGA- MAbort- Reset- FastB2B- Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+) IRQ 0 Device: Supported: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, ExtTag- Device: Latency L0s unlimited, L1 unlimited Device: Errors: Correctable+ Non-Fatal+ Fatal+ Unsupported+ Device: RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop- Device: MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes Link: Supported Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Port 1 Link: Latency L0s 1us, L1 4us Link: ASPM Disabled RCB 64 bytes CommClk- ExtSynch- Link: Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1 Slot:
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] squeezeslave and alsa
I've finally had a chance to look at this. The behaviour you're seeing is normal, at least based on my testing. The list of available devices changes because the 1st squeezeslave instance has already opened an audio device. The portaudio library function called to display the -L list doesn't return devices already in use. -- ralphy ralphy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3484 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67617 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] BrutefirDRC version 1.1.1 for Squeezeboxcenter 7.4.0 released
I am the guy causing Klaas all this extra work. Sorry about that. I have been finding a couple of minor issues with hard coded paths and a few minor things in the Perl API. I stumbled upon the BITRATE issue (where the brutefirwrapper chokes because BITRATE was not defined for FLAC). I will try the 1.1.2 release tonight. Currently I only have 3 non 44.1KHz FLAC files, but I think there are a few sites that have high bitrate FLAC samples to try. On a separate note, I am running this on older 2.8GHz Xeon processors with Centos 5.x and I notice that as the brutefir processes are started, my CPU gets pegged to 100% and I hear the music stutter. Anyone else have this issue? -- mamsterla mamsterla's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=469 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69181 ___ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
