Was my post not patronising or self important enough? I've been
practising too.. :)
"Welcoming"? I don't think so. People can't share opinions without being
beaten down or challenged to prove it with a double blind test every
five seconds. Reality is most people don't care that much.
drmatt wrote:
> I think what the honourable gentlemen are attempting to get across to
> you, in their usual patronising self important way, blah, blah, blah...
Before you go placing yourself above the rest of us, consider that this
kind of thread is for long-term members nothing if not
Julf wrote:
> Yes, hifi really is a silly hobby that has no impact on what happens to
> the world, but it is also not rocket science, so there is no reason to
> entertain superstition and pseudoscience.
Fair enough to state one time but there's no need to keep reiterating as
it just goes
drmatt wrote:
> Personally I am ambivalent about this. I don't much care if people want
> to buy esoterica that offers whatever improved X or Y or in fact nothing
> at all but a sense of style, or who want to tweak all day long. No one
> got hurt, no one went broke, and worst case scenario if
drmatt wrote:
> Reality is most people don't care that much.
Most people don't care about reality that much.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W
edwardthern wrote:
> sudo chrt -f -p 99 $(pidof ksoftirqd/0)
> sudo chrt -f -p 99 $(pidof ksoftirqd/1)
> sudo chrt -f -p 99 $(pidof ksoftirqd/2)
> sudo chrt -f -p 99 $(pidof ksoftirqd/3)
I meant to add before that this increases the priority of all the
interrupt processing on your system, not
Julf wrote:
> Most people don't care about reality that much.
Reality includes crap like Trump and Brexit. I'm quite happy with my own
brand of insanity instead.. :)
drmatt's Profile:
hi gestein,
Aren't most radio stations available over the internet, hence already
available via LMS?
There is a pCP web page for extensions, from the [Main Page] in
[Advanced] mode > [Extensions].
I2C is already loaded by default in /mnt/mmblk0p1/config.txt ($ m1; c1;
vicfg)
Code:
All this for sugesting that you should only focus your effort in
diffrences that actually exist ? wheter we can "hear things" is not
actually always relevent.
The human phsycke is actually very sugestible you can hear all sorts of
things all the time with sigthed testing .
If the systems
Pascal Hibon wrote:
> Careful not to forget the audiophile grade power cables to power the
> switches, modems, etc !
And I guess it all has to run off batteries. I still haven't found
sub-power stations with linear regulators.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In
I see. Thanks.
So I am on the right way ;-)
Is there a special/common place to put these files?
For installation of the missing python classes, I have to do:
tce-load -wi python-RPi.GPIO.tcz
Correct?
There is a hint at the developers homepage, that the I2C has to be
enabled.
How to do this?
I think what the honourable gentlemen are attempting to get across to
you, in their usual patronising self important way, is that science does
indeed show that people are very very bad at accurately and consistently
judging sound. In all aspects of human senses there is an element of
drmatt wrote:
> No, aggressive and persistently patronising remarks means they d o n '
> t c o m e r o u n d h e r e n o m o r e , truth or otherwise.
>
> Not that this thread is that bad, really..
That was my plan.
edwardthern wrote:
> Yeah you're right, I wouldn't call the folks here Audiophile's.
Thank you - I think most of us take that as a compliment.
> Better to let people know who can actually hear a difference.
Indeed. I recommend 'Computer Audiophile'
(http://www.computeraudiophile.com/forum/),
drmatt wrote:
> I would be very surprised if the chrt tweaks documented at the beginning
> of this thread had any effect to playback at all. Bits is bits, and
> short of having an actual buffer underrun on playback almost nothing
> else is likely to be audible.
I wish there was a way to add a
Julf wrote:
> Thank you - I think most of us take that as a compliment.
>
>
>
> Indeed. I recommend 'Computer Audiophile'
> (http://www.computeraudiophile.com/forum/), they are much more into the
> placebophile lifestyle, and they could use more eyeballs for advertising
> and sponsorship
Julf wrote:
> (not that there are many newcomers these days).
No, aggressive and persistently patronising remarks means they don't
come round here no more, truth or otherwise.
drmatt's Profile:
Hi,
I use Beagle Bone Black ARM computer + Debian Wheezy and 4.5.0 kernel.
I've just copied newest 'squeezelite-1.8.5-809-armv6hf.tar.gz' binary on
my computer from Ralphy.
Unfortunately when I start squeezelite I receive message:
Code:
root@botic:/opt# squeezelite
edwardthern wrote:
> Let you guys go back to listening to tin cans and strings.
>
You've seen a picture of my high-end audiophool system! ;)
JackOfAll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3069
View
19 matches
Mail list logo
