I guess I'm not clear on just where the user types in a new value - over
the top of an existing choice that's loaded into the menu?
Pete
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 9:53 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> The entry doesn't usually go into the menu at all. The field is like an
> "other" box. The user can eit
On 12/29/11 11:08 PM, Pete wrote:
I noticed that too. Just looked at the Apple HUG document for OS X and it
is silent on the matter. IT feels like the arrow keys should work to me
since they do work in an option menu and and a combo menu is supposed to a
combination of an option menu and a field
I noticed that too. Just looked at the Apple HUG document for OS X and it
is silent on the matter. IT feels like the arrow keys should work to me
since they do work in an option menu and and a combo menu is supposed to a
combination of an option menu and a field.
On a related topic, I've always h
In OS X at least, text arrows don't work in the field portion of a
combo-box button. Should they? What's considered standard behavior for
those?
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
__
S'not. ;-) It's the handler that builds contextual menus. By trapping it and
doing your own thing you can make your own contextual menus, or add to existing
ones. I have this in a frontScript which puts a few extra things at the top of
the contextual menu if a field is the target:
on revHookBui
Bob Sneidar wrote:
I have been using a trick John Craig showed me for appending to a contextual menu which
has been very handy for me. The gotcha is that instead of building the menu on the fly
using "put theMenuItem into line 1 of theMenu" (or something like that) I
decided to simply create
Hi all.
I have been using a trick John Craig showed me for appending to a contextual
menu which has been very handy for me. The gotcha is that instead of building
the menu on the fly using "put theMenuItem into line 1 of theMenu" (or
something like that) I decided to simply create a custom pro
Keith wrote:
Richard: I have a pretty large stack with lots of graphics and controls... I
could just save the stack to save the settings, but each stack would be
quite large in size. Also, if I need to upgrade the software, all of the
saved stacks would need to be updated accordingly.
I have de
Hello everyone,
The following two lines used to work fine in a startup script.
libURLSetLogField the long id of fld “Connection Log" of card "Connection"
of stack “Headquarters"
libURLSetFTPListCommand “NLST”
Today I upgraded to version 5.02 of LiveCode and I get the following error
mess
Thanks to everyone for your input...
Richard: I have a pretty large stack with lots of graphics and controls... I
could just save the stack to save the settings, but each stack would be
quite large in size. Also, if I need to upgrade the software, all of the
saved stacks would need to be updat
Bob Sneidar wrote:
It seems like it would be easier to clone a stack, then reset everything in it,
or just keep a copy of a virgin stack around. You would have to update it every
time you made any changes to the original though.
That's been my experience as well. The stack file format is so
Right. It seems like it would be easier to clone a stack, then reset everything
in it, or just keep a copy of a virgin stack around. You would have to update
it every time you made any changes to the original though.
Bob
On Dec 28, 2011, at 1:51 PM, stephen barncard wrote:
> A while ago I ex
12 matches
Mail list logo
