Re: Internet library and LC9

2018-05-16 Thread Charles Warwick via use-livecode
Hi Paul, TsNet tries to reuse existing connections where possible. While this usually is very effective, it can sometimes cause delays like you were experiencing. Try issuing the command: tsNetLibUrlReuseConnection false Regards, Charles. > On 17 May 2018, at 3:34 am, Paul Dupuis via

Re: new library messages

2018-05-16 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode
On 05/16/2018 09:22 PM, Monte Goulding via use-livecode wrote: On 17 May 2018, at 1:44 pm, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote: Looking through some of the IDE's library stacks, I see handlers for the messages extensionInitialize and extensionFinalize. From

Re: new library messages

2018-05-16 Thread Monte Goulding via use-livecode
> On 17 May 2018, at 1:44 pm, Mark Wieder via use-livecode > wrote: > > Looking through some of the IDE's library stacks, I see handlers for the > messages extensionInitialize and extensionFinalize. From the code in the > handlers it seems that these are now

new library messages

2018-05-16 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode
Looking through some of the IDE's library stacks, I see handlers for the messages extensionInitialize and extensionFinalize. From the code in the handlers it seems that these are now standard ways to set up and tear down extension libraries, but I don't see the messages documented anywhere.

Re: Web fonts

2018-05-16 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
I've never tried it ...but the easy way to test is to "set the htmltext of field "Text" to html_text" .. if your html has inline font definition chances are it should work. let us know. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Peter Bogdanoff via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

Web fonts

2018-05-16 Thread Peter Bogdanoff via use-livecode
Crazy question, but is it possible to use a web font within a internet-connected LiveCode application? Peter Bogdanoff ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your

Re: [BUG] Browser widget implemented without access to localStorage API

2018-05-16 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Trevor DeVore wrote: > I always open up a second instance of LiveCode when I build > standalones. There is too much going on in the standalone builder > to trust that your environment will be the same after everything > is done. I would like to see standalone building should be moved > to a

Re: Material Design - any plans to allow more granularity in design?

2018-05-16 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
We use the color pallete from material design .my goal eventually was to create a plugin for LC for color selection, but as far as the whole philosophy...I really doubt that this is on the radar of Livecode the company they probably feel their efforts are better suited on technologies

Re: [BUG] Browser widget implemented without access to localStorage API

2018-05-16 Thread Andre Garzia via use-livecode
Panos, Found a race condition that causes the behavior I mentioned originally. It is quite easy to reproduce, just try to execute any "liveCode.*" as soon as the page loads. Apparently it takes some time (ticks? millisecs?) for the liveCode.* namespace to be available for scripts running on the

Internet library and LC9

2018-05-16 Thread Paul Dupuis via use-livecode
I am transitioning some applications that were built as standalone under  LC6.7.11 to LC 9.0.0. In most cases, the migrations are going well with mostly appearance issues (due to different default fonts and such). This week, I have encountered a functional issue. An app (stack) I have, as part of

RE: [BUG] Browser widget implemented without access to localStorage API

2018-05-16 Thread Ralph DiMola via use-livecode
Agreed but I have had registry problems in the past doing that so I avoid it. Livecode may not be a problem in that regard. Ralph DiMola IT Director Evergreen Information Services rdim...@evergreeninfo.net -Original Message- From: use-livecode

Re: [BUG] Browser widget implemented without access to localStorage API

2018-05-16 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Agreed. In fact, some apps designed to disallow multiple instances will launch two if the taskbar icon is clicked multiple times before the first instance launches. Bob S > On May 16, 2018, at 09:25 , Trevor DeVore via use-livecode > wrote: > > On Wed, May

Re: [BUG] Browser widget implemented without access to localStorage API

2018-05-16 Thread Trevor DeVore via use-livecode
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Ralph DiMola via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > It's not that easy on Windows. > Why not? I just duplicated the LiveCode Business.exe on Windows 10 and was able to launch two separate instances of LiveCode. -- Trevor DeVore ScreenSteps

RE: [BUG] Browser widget implemented without access to localStorage API

2018-05-16 Thread Ralph DiMola via use-livecode
It's not that easy on Windows. Ralph DiMola IT Director Evergreen Information Services rdim...@evergreeninfo.net -Original Message- From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Trevor DeVore via use-livecode Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 11:55 AM To:

Re: [BUG] Browser widget implemented without access to localStorage API

2018-05-16 Thread Trevor DeVore via use-livecode
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 6:47 AM Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode wrote: > So, I'm not only one… > > How do I create a second instance of LiveCode (or any app for matter) Make a copy of the app and launch it. -- Trevor DeVore ScreenSteps >

Re: [BUG] Browser widget implemented without access to localStorage API

2018-05-16 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Hah! I've been complaining about standalone building since v7! (or v8 not sure). I'm getting the impression people are just deleting my posts! ;-) Bob S > On May 16, 2018, at 06:47 , Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode > wrote: > > So, I'm not only

Re: [BUG] Browser widget implemented without access to localStorage API

2018-05-16 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
+1 > On May 16, 2018, at 03:09 , Trevor DeVore via use-livecode > wrote: > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:51 PM Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via > use-livecode wrote: > >> >> so then, for now I quit livecode, and reboot everytime

Re: [BUG] Browser widget implemented without access to localStorage API

2018-05-16 Thread Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode
So, I'm not only one… How do I create a second instance of LiveCode (or any app for matter) On 5/16/18, 12:10 AM, "use-livecode on behalf of Trevor DeVore via use-livecode" wrote: >so then, for now I quit

Material Design - any plans to allow more granularity in design?

2018-05-16 Thread R.H. via use-livecode
Over 80% of my work in LiveCode is dedicated to user interface design. I would like to support Material Design which is well supported by tools such as Angular JS Material in Javascript -- and such framework (or similar ones) give the idea of modern UIX. I think it is worth reading for

Re. Data Grid does not work in resizeStack handler

2018-05-16 Thread R.H. via use-livecode
> Tom Glod wrote: " can you post your resize script?" Dear Tom, here is the script where the data grid fails and I do not know why. Thank you for taking notice. on resizeStack w,h ## Datagrid is the "master", a list of project names. ## There is a detail form on top that opens when

Re: [BUG] Browser widget implemented without access to localStorage API

2018-05-16 Thread Trevor DeVore via use-livecode
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:51 PM Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode wrote: > > so then, for now I quit livecode, and reboot everytime will do a build, > nuisance. I always open up a second instance of LiveCode when I build standalones. There is too much