Maybe? I haven't explored LCB at all. I'm much more interested in extending
Livecode Script, if that ever becomes possible.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 9:42 PM Brian Milby via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Isn’t this somewhat possible in LCB now? I know there isn’t really any
In my opinion the focus should be on performance which has been slow down
approx. 9 times compared to version 6.
You can build as much as “features” as you want but this should never hit the
performance of the product.
Just my two cents.
On 31/08/2018, 06:41, "use-livecode on behalf of Brian
Isn’t this somewhat possible in LCB now? I know there isn’t really any
documentation on how to write the syntax, but there are the examples of the
built in libraries. But, the added syntax would only work in LCB code.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 30, 2018, 11:31 PM -0500, Geoff Canyon via use-livecode
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 2:42 PM Martin Koob via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> I wonder if Open Language will get some attention..
>
Open Language was always my favorite feature. I'd still like to be able to
grow/morph the syntax.
__
I finally installed Android Studio. I have API 28, 26, and 15 installed.
Everything else was pretty much the defaults. (Hint: you don't need to
move the sdk directory out of your Library, just create an alias and put it
on your desktop. When you select the alias, LC will resolve it and store
the
Mike asked...
> James,
> Talk about why dash.
I mainly use my iPad to read my email. When reading LC stuff there have been
times when I wanted to check the dictionary. Unfortunately for quite some time
(almost as far back as the Kickstarter) to online API has not been friendly to
a touch interf
Jim:
> This just doesn’t work in all cases
That's the key though, don't repeat when it's not necessary! A day with
no repeats is an efficient day. ;)
Best wishes,
Curry Kenworthy
Custom Software Development
LiveCode Training and Consulting
http://livecodeconsulting.com/
_
try using javascript by doing "do in widget"
https://www.ajaymatharu.com/how-to-prevent-image-from-caching-in-javascript/
i bet that javascript may be your best chance at controlling the browser
widget in any kind of detail. good luck let us know if you got it.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 5:51 PM R
> I wrote:
>
> Then there is also this repeat-less approach using arrays and filter:
> function findWordOffsets pText, pSearchTerm
> put replaceText(pText,"\W+"," ") into pText
> split pText by space
> combine pText with cr and tab
> filter pText with "*" & tab & pSearchTe
> On 30/08/2018 10:24, Keith Clarke via use-livecode wrote:
>> Folks,
>> Is there a single-pass mechanism or more efficient way of returning the
>> wordOffset of each instance of ?the? in ?the quick brown fox jumped over the
>> lazy dog? than to use two passes through the text?
Then there is als
Hi there,
I know this has come up before but
looking through the old archives didn’t
seem to turn up a working answer.
Is there a good way to prevent a web-browser
from re-displaying an image in it’s cache?
I tried using a random number after the .lc URL
such as:
http://www.mysite.com/destinati
I wonder if Open Language will get some attention..
It was on the Road Map in 2014.
https://livecode.com/the-present-and-future-livecode/
>Open Language: With the core refactoring almost complete (LiveCode 7.0)
we’ve started to turn our attention
>to the final aspect of this project which is to o
Bug report https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=21544
Bob S
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/l
Tom Glod wrote:
> We have to remember the engine and the IDE are two distinct
> projects.
> The problems are mostly in the IDE. I;m finding the engine to be
> very solid.
The one thing every LiveCode scripter has in common is that they can use
LiveCode Script.
The more IDE scripting fixe
Mark tends to complain about the engine, but they also inherited the engine
when they bought it from MetaCard. He has said that it is difficult to
work on.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 2:57 PM Tom Glod via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Kevin seemed pretty pumped about it.
>
>
Kevin seemed pretty pumped about it.
We have to remember the engine and the IDE are two distinct projects.
The problems are mostly in the IDE. I;m finding the engine to be very solid.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 2:29 AM Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> J
> Le 30 août 2018 à 17:14, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode
> a écrit :
>
> Ludovic
>
> Can you copy that whole handler to the list?
>
> round((item 4 of the screenrect*the systemscale)/2)-theight // +theight
>
> only seems partial?
Hello,
You can download my test stack here :
In the above code, I don't see a "local sRect" declaration which would need
to be outside the handlers to work as intended.
What about just hard coding the rect as a test? If you can set the stack
rect to what you know the screen to be that way, then we can proceed to
figure out why that value is
There is already a PR merged into 9.1 that will auto select the text of any
field in the PI when you enter it via tab. This also selects the key field
in the Custom Properties inspector when the highlight changes. If you tab
into the value, then the value is selected.
Changing the logic to selec
I will ina bit. I'm on conference calls until lunch.
Bob S
> On Aug 29, 2018, at 16:35 , Monte Goulding via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
>> On 30 Aug 2018, at 1:15 am, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
>> wrote:
>>
>> Just a heads up for anyone using Trevor's excellent XML library, the
>> ConvertX
Hi Brian.
Actually for my purposes I need the last key of the array node. For example, if
I have an array:
myArray [level1] [level2] [level3]
and the value is "Test1"
then I need to return an array:
aArrayNode [level3]
I worked it out using my method so I'm not asking for a modification to
I don't use a sub-stack to move from the splash to the main GUI stack. My
stub-stack (after using my hack to display the splash card correctly) does
1: load all library stacks, sets all behaviors/back scripts,... 2: a send in
10 ticks to a handler that opens the GUI stack. After that there is no
is
I tried it.
Sure, I get the screenrect in advance; I put an answer sRect in a one stack
opencard script...
I get an answer...
but this does not work on the stack the has browser...
so I now suspect to browser widget is blocking "registration" the screen rect.
Now only that it may be block
Ludovic
Can you copy that whole handler to the list?
round((item 4 of the screenrect*the systemscale)/2)-theight // +theight
only seems partial?
On 8/19/18 6:11 PM, Ludovic THEBAULT via use-livecode wrote:
> But i found i can get the « real » top and bottom with : round((item 4 of the
> scree
Oh there you go! That works.
Bob S
> On Aug 29, 2018, at 13:58 , Brian Milby via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Here is another way to do it:
>
> function getHilightedValue pTreeWidgetReference
> local tElement, tArray
> put the arrayData of pTreeWidgetReference into tArray
> put the hilite
Ha! One has to thank our community for "never giving up!" That spirit alone is
worth it weight in gold -- the Indy License!
@ Brain "Gee, why didn't I think of that!"
Not calling as substack; I use this as navigation between mainstack (the splash
screen and that has the stack files is always
hh:
> Sadly LC 9 is at about 10 times slower
> than LC 6 with such fast scripts.
Yes, I've been doing some benchmarks and LC 9 usually takes anywhere
from 2x to 8x as long to perform a job. With or without text being
involved. It is a serious problem that should not be neglected across
mult
James,
Talk about why dash.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> Alex T. wrote:
>
> put 0 into tOffset
> repeat for each trueWord W in tSource
>add 1 to tOffset
>if W = myWord then
> put tOffset & comma after tOffsetList
>end if
> end repeat
This is (whether trueWord or word chunks used) probably the fastest
method for an offset counting of
For a more general context see
http://www.runrev.com/pipermail/use-livecode//2004-February/032280.html
Sadly LC 9 is at about 10 times slower than LC 6 with such fast scripts.
For example LC 6.7.11 needs at about 500 ms to evaluate a 1 MByte string,
LC 9.0.0 needs at about 5 seconds.
___
OK, this time I'm just typing into email - havent tested these
suggestions :-)
On 30/08/2018 10:24, Keith Clarke via use-livecode wrote:
Folks,
Is there a single-pass mechanism or more efficient way of returning the
wordOffset of each instance of ‘the’ in ‘the quick brown fox jumped over the
Folks,
Is there a single-pass mechanism or more efficient way of returning the
wordOffset of each instance of ‘the’ in ‘the quick brown fox jumped over the
lazy dog’ than to use two passes through the text?
Pass-1. Count the instances of ‘the’ into an array and then
Pass-2. Repeat for the count o
32 matches
Mail list logo
