Hello all,
I usually follow these steps, and I almost never have problems with the
simulator:
(Note: these instructions are for Xcode11.1, but are applicable to any
Xcode version)
0. Make sure the command line tools that will be used by LiveCode are the
ones of the correct Xcode:
(Launch Xcode
I found that launching the simulator and getting a device running BEFORE
testing from LC often helped. As an aside, since setting up LC 9.6.0(dp1) and
xCode 11.1 Ive been unable to get the simulator to load my app. I’m still
fiddling to see what how to attack it differently :- )
(If I go back
Wow, this is fun. Well thanks to Curry I got a version of Xcode that works
(10.1) with LC 9.5 and Mojave. I make a simple app with one button and try to
launch in the Simulator and I get an error "The simulator seems to be taking a
long time to launch..." Sometimes get another error "Unable to
LC and Xcode are a wee bit particular which version. Bookmark this page:
https://livecode.com/docs/9-5-0/faq/faq/
Best wishes,
Curry Kenworthy
Custom Software Development
"Better Methods, Better Results"
LiveCode Training and Consulting
http://livecodeconsulting.com/
I’m trying to get set up to build for iOS. I got an iOS development certificate
and a provisioning profile. In my standalone setting under iOS I have selected
that profile. But when I try to set up Preferences for mobile support, I locate
Xcode app bundle per the instructions (version 11.2.1)
Nice work, Bob - thanks! And thanks for the MIT License.
And super-thanks for including this link in your Read Me - very helpful
for understanding the goals and design of CUIDs:
http://usecuid.org/
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Bob Hall wrote:
> I created a new library stack
I created a new library stack to create cuid compliant unique ids in Livecode.
What the heck is a cuid you ask? Well, in a nutshell, a cuid is a "portable and
sequentially-ordered unique identifier designed for horizontal scalability and
speed". You can use a cuid just like you would a UUID.
On 12/3/19 3:40 PM, Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode wrote:
My comment was meant as a joke by the way not to promote the product!The
brochure was funny to me because of the used graphics.
Yes, I got the part about it being a joke. And that pdf is unbearably
hard to read. Nonetheless, there
Rick:
> Try writing a serious arcade game with LiveCode.
> Sorry but it just isn’t up to the task as it isn’t
> fast enough.
That contains both true and false elements.
True: LC is FAR too slow, and despite some progress lately in partially
getting back to where it was, still needs a serious
My comment was meant as a joke by the way not to promote the product!The
brochure was funny to me because of the used graphics.
Best,Erik
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 9:26 PM +0100, "Mark Wieder via use-livecode"
wrote:
On 12/3/19 6:32 AM, Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode wrote:
> If you
Their website is terrible to see what the product actually is and does.
But ok after looking for a while i thought wow, if can do all that. And
you only need to pay once as far as i can see, although it might be a
lot more.
It offers Java, iOs, Android, Windows, Mac, PHP, Linux, Win ce,
On 12/3/19 6:32 AM, Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode wrote:
If you want to have a really sexy development with fancy animation stuff, take
a look at the brochure of WinDev.
It's a French based company so I don't have to add any comment ;-)
On 12/3/19 1:24 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
But consider other common UI conventions, like a swipe transition.
This is one of my top wish-list items for mobile. Visual effects aren't
the same, the swipe needs to follow the user's finger.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay |
I used Compile-it forever. It was faster than the compiled v.2x HC by orders of
magnitude.
But, and this is hardly a fair test, I get over 8 million passes per second
through a repeat loop in LC if I do not tax it overmuch, say, adding 1 to a
variable on each pass.
The point is, how much more
Rick Harrison wrote:
> Try writing a serious arcade game with LiveCode.
> Sorry but it just isn’t up to the task as it isn’t fast
> enough.
Agreed, but I don't know what the solution is. Maybe Mark Waddingham
can chime in here with guidance.
> Remember Compile-It for Hypercard? Perhaps
>
Paul Dupuis wrote:
> I see "apps" that have fancy animated effects and spin pretty GIFs
> while doing some task to let me know that the task is being done
>
> ... and all I can think is: If they dropped ALL the cute animation
> crap and spent the CPU cycles on doing the task I wanted done,
Try writing a serious arcade game with LiveCode.
Sorry but it just isn’t up to the task as it isn’t fast
enough.
Remember Compile-It for Hypercard? Perhaps
we need something similar for LiveCode that
would run at standalone creation time, or
whenever we request it for that extra-speed.
I know
If you want to have a really sexy development with fancy animation stuff, take
a look at the brochure of WinDev.
It's a French based company so I don't have to add any comment ;-)
https://www.pcsoft-windev-webdev.com/WX24-Features.pdf?201906121510
On 03/12/2019, 14:50, "use-livecode on
OK, OK . . .
So, if I have a series of images being flipped-through inside a graphic
'frame' and DON'T
have any *wait* statements the thing happens so quickly I cannot see the
animation at all: so, to get
60 frames a second, presumably, one has to have a *wait 1 tick*
statement between each
For Mickey Mouse, he would have been updated 12 times per second, and almost
all cartoons you’ve ever watched were animated at 12 frames per second. The
film was projected at 24 frames per second, and all normal movies you’ve seen
in a cinema were also at 24 frame per second. PAL TV is 25
I really am too old-fashion.
I see "apps" that have fancy animated effects and spin pretty GIFs while
doing some task to let me know that the task is being done
... and all I can think is: If they dropped ALL the cute animation crap
and spent the CPU cycles on doing the task I wanted
Tiemo,
i have no experiences with AWS. But what i can say is, that when changing an
SSL certificate on a server there should no changes be required in the
frontend application created with LC. At least here i did not encounter any
problems when i switched from unsecure to secure connections
Hello,
this is a little bit off topic, but I hope I find here some experts and
hints to this issue.
I have some LC programs which communicate via https to PHP programs on a
webserver. Those PHP programs communicate with a RDS database on a aws
server.
Now I got a mail from aws, that they are
23 matches
Mail list logo
