Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

Actually their link is not correct - press on the extras icon - Monkeybread does some awesome addons and keeps them upto date. Some are included put some go way past both the builtin XOJO and LC "widgets" Another company's software I used for visual Foxpro and Delphi over the years was

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

Actually I wasn't particularly addressing you. For one thing, I'll wager you've got hundreds of posts on the Forum. On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 7:09 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > My biggest "whine" is not the ending of the open source initiative - it's >

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

Folks: I’ve been following this thread and have a few thoughts I decided to share. Interestingly, I don’t see Android support for XOJO. Hmm…. In my case (I have a Commercial license), I am really happy that version 10 of LC will be improving the web software. I’ve been thinking about diving

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

On 06/09/2021 19:07, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode wrote: The biggest error livecode has made all these years is not creating a "working" storefront that doesn't look like it has been totally given up on. Not sure that's the "biggest" - but yes, I agree it looks unloved. Look at the addons

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

Hi Bernard, I could be called one of the whiners but I have paid my indy licence since the kickstarter and the business Upgrade (until a year ago - Incase I needed it - I didnt). My biggest "whine" is not the ending of the open source initiative - it's the fact that OUR biggest competitors (XOJO

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 3:08 PM Kevin Miller via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > We have dabbled with a number of low cost /entry level offerings in the > past. There used to be a starter kit that allowed only a certain number of > lines of code per object. We had

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

> On Sep 6, 2021, at 12:22 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode > wrote: > > I’m happy paying for my license because I can see the value LC provides me, > and how my money directly affects their ability to output quality stuff. I > love FOSS, but I’d rather have a healthy LC Ltd around with the

Re: Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

Upgrading this could be a very useful project. There is a lot of content in there but it has the issues you list. Kind regards, Kevin Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/ LiveCode: Develop Yourself On 06/09/2021, 14:11, "use-livecode on behalf of Alex Tweedly via

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

The direction is broadly the one we are following, however we are always open to tweaking things. With regard to the conversation on free starter kit/ non-standalone building etc, I'll copy what I said on the forums: We have dabbled with a number of low cost /entry level offerings in the past.

Building stuff

It’s a good question - what to build with regard to the sort of tools and components a vibrant developer community expects. I only know about examples of open source communities, and though I’d be interested in exploring how such a coding community might work with alternative closed licensing

Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

In the main thread, I mentioned that I found revOnline (aka "Sample Stacks"), but didn't say how or why. Here the answer to that ... It has: - no differentiation between 'libraries' and 'examples' - it has no support for script-only stacks, which is surely the way most libraries will be done

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

+1    Yes, speculation is fun, but probably not very useful :-) On 06/09/2021 12:20, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote: Let’s take a step back for a second and realise as a community we lack many things that other programming language communities have. We do have a very healthy mailing

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

+1 > Am 06.09.2021 um 13:20 schrieb Andre Garzia via use-livecode > : > > Don’t know how many people here remember that they tried that approach with > Dreamcard. I really like it, but in the end it didn’t work for the company. I > see many members here in the list saying “what should be

Re: 9.6.4-gm-1 what?

The "old" download was build 15551 and had a problem with building HTML5 standalones. The new one is build 15552 which has that bug fixed. See https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23317 Regards, Matthias > Am 06.09.2021 um

9.6.4-gm-1 what?

So, I launched 9.6.4 today and got a notification to download 9.6.4-gm-1, this is not a version scheme that LC has been using before. I remember them being DP for developer previews, then becoming RC for release candidates, and then stable. I don’t remember Gold Masters in their versions, which

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

Don’t know how many people here remember that they tried that approach with Dreamcard. I really like it, but in the end it didn’t work for the company. I see many members here in the list saying “what should be done”, “what would have worked”, and I wanted to remember every one that while