Re: Bard AI

2023-03-24 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
That's wonderful, and much better! I'll be first to admit that GPT is superior, and several reviewers also agree. Google reminds the testers that Bard is in its early stages, frequently wrong, and we should double check its answers. They put a Google It button right below the response. --

Re: Bard AI

2023-03-24 Thread Peter Bogdanoff via use-livecode
+11 > On Mar 24, 2023, at 7:25 PM, Alan Stenhouse via use-livecode > wrote: > > Nice one. Great to see Bard in action. > > Taking this as inspiration (and hoping this doesn't start Bard v chatGPT v ? > wars), I asked chatGPT to "write me a sonnet about LiveCode". > > > Upon the canvas

Re: Bard AI

2023-03-24 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
It was in the agreement I had to acknowledge before I could get in, and then plastered all over the place elsewhere. I think it's open to the public now, I saw a link somewhere that let you get on the waiting list. You could search for that if you want to try Bard. Google One subscribers like

Re: Bard AI

2023-03-24 Thread Alan Stenhouse via use-livecode
Nice one. Great to see Bard in action. Taking this as inspiration (and hoping this doesn't start Bard v chatGPT v ? wars), I asked chatGPT to "write me a sonnet about LiveCode". Upon the canvas of the digital sphere, LiveCode emerges, a beacon of grace, Translating thoughts to scripts that

Re: Bard AI

2023-03-24 Thread Craig Newman via use-livecode
Jacque. They say that? Whether human or machine, where else would any of “us” glean information??? Craig > On Mar 24, 2023, at 3:34 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode > wrote: > > So much for Google's claim it doesn't directly pull from existing text. > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay |

Re: Bard AI

2023-03-24 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
So much for Google's claim it doesn't directly pull from existing text. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On March 24, 2023 7:55:58 AM Craig Newman via use-livecode wrote: We are ether doomed or blessed. We shall see...

Re: running platform-native by default

2023-03-24 Thread Phil Davis via use-livecode
Thanks Mark. Last night I discovered I could do that, but it revealed a well-hidden bug in one app when launched on either platform, so for now I may just deliver 2 versions of the app. Thank you! Phil On 3/24/23 1:10 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: On 2023-03-22 19:45, Phil

Re: Bard AI

2023-03-24 Thread Sean Cole via use-livecode
Wow! Sean ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Re: Bard AI

2023-03-24 Thread Craig Newman via use-livecode
We are ether doomed or blessed. We shall see... One small snippet from Jacques “new response” query: "and are typed at compile time based purely on context.” was a line I wrote in Wikipedia many years ago. It just made me realize how such engines comb the entire universe for pertinent content,

Re: running platform-native by default

2023-03-24 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
On 2023-03-22 19:45, Phil Davis via use-livecode wrote: I'm using LC 9.6.8 to build some macOS Intel/Silicon ("dual-native") apps. Upon first launch of these apps on my Silicon test machine, I always get the OS dialog that says "To open '', you need to install Rosetta. Do you want to install