, and lots of specialized handlers to accomodate similar
functionality on non-Mac machines. I was probably a little presumptuous,
forgetting that some folks develop only for their own use.
Not presumptuous.
From your previous message I got the impression that the number of
home-brewers on the list
that the number of
home-brewers on the list is relatively small.
I'm wondering: home-brewers / professional developers on the list 1? 0.1?
By home-brewers I mean amateurs developing for their own use.
Home-brewers don't normally work cross-platform. Professional developers
usually do
the impression that the number of
home-brewers on the list is relatively small.
I'm wondering: home-brewers / professional developers on the list 1? 0.1?
By home-brewers I mean amateurs developing for their own use.
Home-brewers don't normally work cross-platform. Professional developers
of specialized handlers to accomodate similar functionality on non-Mac
machines. I was probably a little presumptuous, forgetting that some folks
develop only for their own use.
Not presumptuous.
From your previous message I got the impression that the number of
home-brewers on the list is relatively
that the number of
home-brewers on the list is relatively small.
I'm wondering: home-brewers / professional developers on the list 1? 0.1?
By home-brewers I mean amateurs developing for their own use.
1. I develop in-house software for my language school; all programs
running on either Linux
Reminds me of Madagascar 2. All hail the New York Giants!
On Oct 3, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Tim-
Wednesday, October 3, 2012, 9:20:58 AM, you wrote:
Is LC the preferred tool for non-pros developing for their own use? If not
then what is?
Asking that on the LC list is like
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:
Does that make me a home-brewer?
Bah.
Soak some malted barley in hot water, rinse with hotter water, boil
the rinse with female hop flowers, cool down,and add yeast.
*Then* you will be a home brewer . . .
:)
--
