Hi Pierre,
Pierre Sahores-2 wrote
;D
in response to J. Landman Gay who wrote:
Of course. That goes without saying. But given
how long it took the guys who wrote it to reverse
their own files, I trust it.
That is an interesting cliffhanger ending
for this thread!
But, What is your
As safe as the encryption employed. We have several choices in Livecode.
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Alejandro Tejada capellan2...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Pierre,
Pierre Sahores-2 wrote
;D
in response to J. Landman Gay who wrote:
Of course. That goes without saying. But given
how
On 11/4/12 4:03 PM, Alejandro Tejada wrote:
But, What is your personal conclusion
about the methods proposed to protect
stacks?
Safe or Not?
I think it depends on how paranoid you need to be. If we disregard
determined hackers who have infinite amounts of time, then I think it is
possible
Hi from Beautiful Brittany,
Mark wrote :
and even if it is part of a standalone it isn't too difficult
to detach the stack and save it as a stackfile again.
Mark, That intrigued me ! Could you clarify that statement
a little, or point me to a link which will explain how to
do this.
Best
2012/11/3 Francis Nugent Dixon effe...@wanadoo.fr:
Hi from Beautiful Brittany,
Mark wrote :
and even if it is part of a standalone it isn't too difficult
to detach the stack and save it as a stackfile again.
Mark, That intrigued me ! Could you clarify that statement
a little, or point me
Hi Francis,
If you have a need for this, perhaps it is better that you contact me
off-list.
--
Economy-x-Talk
Consultancy and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
Download Color Converter at http://www.color-converter.com
Op 3-nov-2012, om 12:48 heeft Francis Nugent Dixon het
On 11/3/12 6:48 AM, Francis Nugent Dixon wrote:
Hi from Beautiful Brittany,
Mark wrote :
and even if it is part of a standalone it isn't too difficult
to detach the stack and save it as a stackfile again.
Mark, That intrigued me ! Could you clarify that statement
a little, or point me to a
On 11/2/12 9:44 PM, stephen barncard wrote:
actually I think the dynamic thing was my suggestion
Oops, sorry. Credit where credit is due.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
Jacque,
I think that no longer possible is just a little too strong.
Hackers will always find a way, if they really want to. (No, I don't
consider myself a hacker).
--
Economy-x-Talk
Consultancy and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
Download Color Converter at
On 11/3/12 4:10 PM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
Jacque,
I think that no longer possible is just a little too strong. Hackers
will always find a way, if they really want to. (No, I don't consider
myself a hacker).
Of course. That goes without saying. But given how long it took the guys
who wrote
;D
Le 3 nov. 2012 à 23:20, J. Landman Gay a écrit :
On 11/3/12 4:10 PM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
Jacque,
I think that no longer possible is just a little too strong. Hackers
will always find a way, if they really want to. (No, I don't consider
myself a hacker).
Of course. That goes
Hi all,
I'm needing to protect both the scripts and the text in fields for a project
that is essentially a book--many pages with text. The author of the book is,
well very concerned about piracy.
I see that in the Standalone Application Settings I can protect scripts of
stack files in the
LiveCode
Subject: Protecting stacks
Hi all,
I'm needing to protect both the scripts and the text in fields for a project
that is essentially a book--many pages with text. The author of the book is,
well very concerned about piracy.
I see that in the Standalone Application Settings I
you could encrypt the text, store in custom properties, convert to an
array, and decrypt and display into a locked field on card open.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Peter Bogdanoff bogdan...@me.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm needing to protect both the scripts and the text in fields for a
Thanks Stephan and Ralph!
On Nov 02, 2012, at 04:55 PM, stephen barncard
stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com wrote:
you could encrypt the text, store in custom properties, convert to an
array, and decrypt and display into a locked field on card open.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Peter
Hi Peter,
You can protect stacks with a password, as Ralph suggested.
Basically you can't prevent anyone from opening your stack in the IDE and
copying all the text, if your stack isn't part of a standalone, and even if it
is part of a standalone it isn't too difficult to detach the stack and
Thanks Mark. I will mull over this...
On Nov 02, 2012, at 05:19 PM, Mark Schonewille
m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
You can protect stacks with a password, as Ralph suggested.
Basically you can't prevent anyone from opening your stack in the IDE and copying all the text,
On 11/2/12 7:19 PM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
Hi Peter,
You can protect stacks with a password, as Ralph suggested.
Basically you can't prevent anyone from opening your stack in the IDE
and copying all the text, if your stack isn't part of a standalone,
and even if it is part of a standalone it
On 11/2/12 6:49 PM, Peter Bogdanoff wrote:
I see that in the Standalone Application Settings I can protect scripts
of stack files in the application. However, I have stack files that are
NOT in the application--the app just serves to launch files. How do I
protect the scripts in those files?
actually I think the dynamic thing was my suggestion, I think but no
matter. Based on conversations on this list, the biggest reason for that
choice was to not have the hassle to deal with passwords during
development and the possibility of losing everything.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 7:00 PM, J.
20 matches
Mail list logo
